Detailed Comparison 2025
Nextbase vs NextJet
Compare Nextbase and NextJet side-by-side. We've analyzed features, pricing, and capabilities to help you choose the best boilerplate for your SaaS project.
Quick Overview
Nextbase
NextBase is a Next.js + Supabase full‑stack SaaS starter kit. It combines authentication (with multiple social login providers), team/organization support, subscription payments (Stripe or LemonSqueezy), a prebuilt admin panel and user‑management UI, database & backend setup, and a frontend built with React, Typescript, and Tailwind CSS. On top of that, NextBase includes extras like a MDX‑based blog/docs/landing‑page system, feedback & roadmap/changelog tools, in‑app notifications, and integrations for analytics & error tracking. The architecture is type-safe, modern (React + Next.js app‑router, Supabase backend, TS + Zod validation), and built to support both MVPs and production-ready SaaS products.
Key Features
NextJet
NextJet is a full‑stack SaaS boilerplate built with Next.js, TypeScript and modern web‑app tooling, made to give developers a solid, production‑ready foundation when building subscription‑based or SaaS‑style applications. Out of the box it handles core infrastructure: user authentication + authorization (including OAuth and magic‑link support), payment/subscription logic via Stripe or Lemon Squeezy, and pre‑built user dashboards + admin panel. It also includes content‑management and marketing‑side features: a blog and documentation system using MDX, a customizable landing/marketing site, email templates, and onboarding flows. The project follows a modular, maintainable architecture (monorepo via Turborepo, clean folder structure, typesafety via TypeScript), which helps keep code organized, useful if you plan to grow or scale the app over time. Because much of the “plumbing” is already configured, you can skip repetitive setup and get to building your product‑specific logic faster. At the same time, using NextJet means trusting its built‑in architecture, tech stack and conventions. If your project needs a very different stack, unusual backend/data requirements or a minimal footprint, you might need to refactor or drop parts of what comes with the boilerplate.
Key Features
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | Nextbase$99 | NextJet$69 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $99 | $69 |
| Developer | Bhargav Ponnapalli | Renas Hassan |
| Authentication | ||
| Stripe Integration | ||
| Paddle Integration | ||
| Lemon Squeezy | ||
| Dodo Payments | ||
| Polar | ||
| Creem | ||
| Admin Panel | ||
| User Dashboard | ||
| Subscriptions | ||
| Blog | ||
| SEO Optimized | ||
| Documentation | ||
| Support | ||
| Tailwind CSS | ||
| API | ||
| Two-Factor Auth | ||
| Multi-Tenancy | ||
| Teams | ||
| Shadcn UI | ||
| View Details | View Page | View Page |
Nextbase vs NextJet: Detailed Analysis
When choosing between Nextbase and NextJet, it's essential to understand the key differences that make each boilerplate unique. Both are excellent choices for building SaaS applications, but they cater to different needs and development approaches.
What is Nextbase?
NextBase is a Next.js + Supabase full‑stack SaaS starter kit. It combines authentication (with multiple social login providers), team/organization support, subscription payments (Stripe or LemonSqueezy), a prebuilt admin panel and user‑management UI, database & backend setup, and a frontend built with React, Typescript, and Tailwind CSS. On top of that, NextBase includes extras like a MDX‑based blog/docs/landing‑page system, feedback & roadmap/changelog tools, in‑app notifications, and integrations for analytics & error tracking. The architecture is type-safe, modern (React + Next.js app‑router, Supabase backend, TS + Zod validation), and built to support both MVPs and production-ready SaaS products.
Developed by Bhargav Ponnapalli, Nextbase has become a popular choice among developers looking for a reliable starting point for their SaaS projects.
What is NextJet?
NextJet is a full‑stack SaaS boilerplate built with Next.js, TypeScript and modern web‑app tooling, made to give developers a solid, production‑ready foundation when building subscription‑based or SaaS‑style applications. Out of the box it handles core infrastructure: user authentication + authorization (including OAuth and magic‑link support), payment/subscription logic via Stripe or Lemon Squeezy, and pre‑built user dashboards + admin panel. It also includes content‑management and marketing‑side features: a blog and documentation system using MDX, a customizable landing/marketing site, email templates, and onboarding flows. The project follows a modular, maintainable architecture (monorepo via Turborepo, clean folder structure, typesafety via TypeScript), which helps keep code organized, useful if you plan to grow or scale the app over time. Because much of the “plumbing” is already configured, you can skip repetitive setup and get to building your product‑specific logic faster. At the same time, using NextJet means trusting its built‑in architecture, tech stack and conventions. If your project needs a very different stack, unusual backend/data requirements or a minimal footprint, you might need to refactor or drop parts of what comes with the boilerplate.
Created by Renas Hassan, NextJet offers a robust foundation for building scalable SaaS applications.
Need to Promote Your Startup or Boilerplate?
Check out LaunchDirectories.com to get your startup or boilerplate listed in 100+ product launch directories and gain valuable backlinks from high-authority platforms. This is especially effective for new products looking to quickly build domain authority and gain backlinks.
Payment Integration: Nextbase vs NextJet
Key Differences Between Nextbase and NextJet
💰 Pricing
Nextbase is priced at $99, while NextJet costs $69. NextJet offers better value at a lower price point, saving you 30 dollars.
⚡ Features & Capabilities
Both boilerplates include authentication systems, making it easy to implement user login and registration.
Payment processing is available in both options. Nextbase supports Stripe, while NextJet integrates with Stripe.
Both include admin panels for managing your application.
🎯 Best Use Cases
Nextbase
- • SaaS startups looking for quick deployment
- • Projects requiring authentication
- • Teams with limited budgets
NextJet
- • SaaS applications needing rapid development
- • Projects requiring authentication
- • Teams with limited budgets
When to Choose Nextbase vs NextJet
Choose Nextbase if:
- You want to start with Nextbase's specific tech stack and approach
- Your project aligns with Nextbase's feature set
Choose NextJet if:
- You're looking for the most cost-effective solution
- You prefer NextJet's specific approach and features
- Your requirements match NextJet's capabilities
Final Verdict: Nextbase vs NextJet
Both Nextbase and NextJet are excellent choices for building SaaS applications. Your decision should be based on your specific requirements, budget, and technical preferences.
Nextbase is ideal if you're looking for a feature-rich solution with built-in authentication.
NextJet stands out for its competitive pricing and is perfect for developers who need authentication.
Ultimately, both boilerplates will help you launch your SaaS product faster and more efficiently. Review the detailed comparison above, consider your project requirements, and choose the one that aligns best with your goals.
Frequently Asked Questions: Nextbase vs NextJet
Which is better: Nextbase or NextJet?
The "better" choice depends on your specific needs. Nextbase excels in comprehensive features, while NextJetstands out for value pricing. Consider your budget, required features, and development timeline when making your decision.
What's the price difference between Nextbase and NextJet?
Nextbase costs $99 while NextJet is priced at $69. That's a difference of $30. Both are one-time payments with no recurring fees, making them cost-effective long-term investments for your SaaS project.
Can I switch from Nextbase to NextJet later?
While technically possible, switching boilerplates mid-project is challenging and time-consuming. Each boilerplate has its own architecture, dependencies, and patterns. It's best to carefully evaluate both options now and choose the one that best fits your long-term needs to avoid costly migrations later.
Do Nextbase and NextJet offer similar features?
Both boilerplates offer core SaaS features, but with different implementations and additional capabilities. Check the detailed feature comparison table above to see exactly which features each boilerplate includes. Key differences include payment integrations, authentication systems, and admin panel availability.
Which boilerplate is better for beginners?
For beginners, consider factors like documentation quality, community support, and code complexity. Both Nextbase and NextJet are designed to be developer-friendly, but your choice should depend on your familiarity with their respective tech stacks and the learning resources available.
Are there any hidden costs with Nextbase or NextJet?
Both boilerplates are one-time purchases with no recurring licensing fees. However, you may incur costs for third-party services they integrate with (like payment processors, email services, or hosting platforms). These operational costs are separate from the boilerplate purchase and apply to any SaaS application.
How long does it take to launch with Nextbase vs NextJet?
Both boilerplates significantly reduce development time compared to building from scratch. Depending on your customization needs, you could launch a basic SaaS product in days or weeks rather than months. The exact timeline depends on your specific requirements, team size, and development experience.
Explore More Comparisons
Browse all boilerplates and find the perfect starter kit for your SaaS project.