Ship SaaS vs ShipFlutter

When choosing between Ship SaaS and ShipFlutter, it's essential to understand the key differences that make each boilerplate unique. Both are excellent choices for building SaaS applications, but they cater to different needs and development approaches.

What is Ship SaaS?

Ship SaaS is a full‑stack boilerplate built with Next.js, Supabase (backend/auth/database), and Tailwind CSS, designed to give developers a ready-made foundation for SaaS or subscription‑driven web applications. With Ship SaaS you obtain working user authentication (registration / login / password reset flows via Supabase), database setup, integrated billing/subscription support via Stripe, and a serverless-ready stack that can be hosted on scalable platforms. It also includes public‑facing page templates, a Striped‑connected backend and basic UI/layout scaffolding. Ship SaaS is best when you’re building a SaaS or subscription‑based web app, you value rapid launch, and you’re comfortable with its tech stack and abstractions. It’s ideal for a solo developer, indie founder or small team wanting to get up and running quickly without reinventing the “plumbing.” It may be less suitable if your project needs a highly customized backend, non‑standard architecture, or minimal dependency footprint - in those cases a lighter template or custom build might serve better.

Developed by Nico Botha, Ship SaaS has become a popular choice among developers looking for a reliable starting point for their SaaS projects.

What is ShipFlutter?

ShipFlutter is a cross‑platform starter kit built on Flutter (with Dart), intended to help developers ship Android, iOS and web apps from a single codebase without starting from scratch. It combines frontend UI, backend setup, and common infrastructure so you can launch mobile + web apps faster. ShipFlutter delivers a fully customizable app scaffold including: authentication (email/password, social login, anonymous auth), responsive cross‑platform UI with theming and localization, navigation via GoRouter, state management via Signals, and Material styling. On the backend it offers integration with Firebase (Firestore, Functions, hosting, realtime updates) and optional AI/ML capabilities via Vertex AI useful if you plan AI‑powered features. For monetization or SaaS‑style apps, it supports payments: mobile IAP/subscriptions via RevenueCat and web payments via Lemon Squeezy. It also includes support for notifications, analytics/monitoring, feedback, offline‑ready data handling, and optional templates (for example UI templates, landing‑page/marketing‑page templates, even Tinder‑style or chatbot‑style UIs) enabling you to ship full‑featured apps quickly.

Created by Marcel, ShipFlutter offers a robust foundation for building scalable SaaS applications.

When building a SaaS application, choosing the right payment integration is crucial for monetization success. Let's compare the payment options available in Ship SaaS and ShipFlutter.

Both Ship SaaS and ShipFlutter are excellent choices for building SaaS applications. Your decision should be based on your specific requirements, budget, and technical preferences.

Ship SaaS is ideal if you're looking for a feature-rich solution with built-in authentication.

ShipFlutter stands out for its competitive pricing and is perfect for developers who need specific features.

Ultimately, both boilerplates will help you launch your SaaS product faster and more efficiently. Review the detailed comparison above, consider your project requirements, and choose the one that aligns best with your goals.