Detailed Comparison 2025
Serverless vs Uni-Stack
Compare Serverless and Uni-Stack side-by-side. We've analyzed features, pricing, and capabilities to help you choose the best boilerplate for your SaaS project.
Quick Overview
Serverless
Serverless.page is a full‑stack boilerplate / starter‑kit built on Next.js + React + Firebase + Stripe that aims to accelerate the process of launching a SaaS application. The kit provides essentials such as user authentication, subscription-based payment flows via Stripe, and a content structure including a landing page, blog, and built‑in CMS. It also includes support for team or workspace management (user accounts + team invites), transactional email integrations, and an admin dashboard - everything that typically takes time to wire up is pre‑configured. Because the project uses a serverless infrastructure (Firebase + Next.js), it promises scalability and cost-effectiveness, so there is no need to manage dedicated servers, and billing scale is based on actual usage. Adopting Serverless.page means committing to its stack: Next.js + React + Firebase + Stripe + the provided codebase structure. That gives speed to launch and many built‑in SaaS features, but reduces flexibility if you need a very custom backend, different database, or special integrations. Since it's “full‑featured,” it might feel heavyweight for smaller projects or very basic prototypes. You may end up with more dependencies and configuration than strictly needed if your use case is simple.
Key Features
Uni-Stack
Uni‑Stack is a free, open‑source, production‑ready full‑stack framework for building universal React Native + web apps with a single codebase. It uses modern, type-safe technologies — including Expo (with universal support for iOS, Android and web), Prisma for database management, tRPC for end-to-end type‑safe APIs, and TypeScript for strong typing throughout. With Uni‑Stack you get an integrated stack where routing, UI, database logic, API calls, queries and mutations are all type-safe and unified. It supports multiple UI system options (e.g. Nativewind, Tamagui, gluestack‑ui), giving flexibility in theming and design while keeping a consistent architecture.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | Serverless$399 | Uni-StackFree |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $399 | Free |
| Developer | Garrett Pierson | ROFI |
| Authentication | ||
| Stripe Integration | ||
| Paddle Integration | ||
| Lemon Squeezy | ||
| Dodo Payments | ||
| Polar | ||
| Creem | ||
| Admin Panel | ||
| User Dashboard | ||
| Subscriptions | ||
| Blog | ||
| SEO Optimized | ||
| Documentation | ||
| Support | ||
| Tailwind CSS | ||
| API | ||
| Two-Factor Auth | ||
| Multi-Tenancy | ||
| Teams | ||
| Shadcn UI | ||
| View Details | View Page | View Page |
Serverless vs Uni-Stack: Detailed Analysis
When choosing between Serverless and Uni-Stack, it's essential to understand the key differences that make each boilerplate unique. Both are excellent choices for building SaaS applications, but they cater to different needs and development approaches.
What is Serverless?
Serverless.page is a full‑stack boilerplate / starter‑kit built on Next.js + React + Firebase + Stripe that aims to accelerate the process of launching a SaaS application. The kit provides essentials such as user authentication, subscription-based payment flows via Stripe, and a content structure including a landing page, blog, and built‑in CMS. It also includes support for team or workspace management (user accounts + team invites), transactional email integrations, and an admin dashboard - everything that typically takes time to wire up is pre‑configured. Because the project uses a serverless infrastructure (Firebase + Next.js), it promises scalability and cost-effectiveness, so there is no need to manage dedicated servers, and billing scale is based on actual usage. Adopting Serverless.page means committing to its stack: Next.js + React + Firebase + Stripe + the provided codebase structure. That gives speed to launch and many built‑in SaaS features, but reduces flexibility if you need a very custom backend, different database, or special integrations. Since it's “full‑featured,” it might feel heavyweight for smaller projects or very basic prototypes. You may end up with more dependencies and configuration than strictly needed if your use case is simple.
Developed by Garrett Pierson, Serverless has become a popular choice among developers looking for a reliable starting point for their SaaS projects.
What is Uni-Stack?
Uni‑Stack is a free, open‑source, production‑ready full‑stack framework for building universal React Native + web apps with a single codebase. It uses modern, type-safe technologies — including Expo (with universal support for iOS, Android and web), Prisma for database management, tRPC for end-to-end type‑safe APIs, and TypeScript for strong typing throughout. With Uni‑Stack you get an integrated stack where routing, UI, database logic, API calls, queries and mutations are all type-safe and unified. It supports multiple UI system options (e.g. Nativewind, Tamagui, gluestack‑ui), giving flexibility in theming and design while keeping a consistent architecture.
Created by ROFI, Uni-Stack offers a robust foundation for building scalable SaaS applications.
Need to Promote Your Startup or Boilerplate?
Check out LaunchDirectories.com to get your startup or boilerplate listed in 100+ product launch directories and gain valuable backlinks from high-authority platforms. This is especially effective for new products looking to quickly build domain authority and gain backlinks.
Payment Integration: Serverless vs Uni-Stack
When building a SaaS application, choosing the right payment integration is crucial for monetization success. Let's compare the payment options available in Serverless and Uni-Stack.
Serverless Payment Options
Serverless supports Stripe.
Key Differences Between Serverless and Uni-Stack
💰 Pricing
Serverless is priced at $399, while Uni-Stack costs Free. This makes Serverless the more budget-friendly option, potentially saving you 999600 dollars.
⚡ Features & Capabilities
Serverless includes authentication, while Uni-Stack does not, which could be a deciding factor for user-focused applications.
Serverless includes an admin panel, giving you more control out of the box.
🎯 Best Use Cases
Serverless
- • SaaS startups looking for quick deployment
- • Projects requiring authentication
- • Teams with flexible budgets
Uni-Stack
- • SaaS applications needing rapid development
- • Projects requiring custom features
- • Teams with flexible budgets
When to Choose Serverless vs Uni-Stack
Choose Serverless if:
- You're looking for the most cost-effective solution
- You need built-in authentication out of the box
- You require an admin panel for managing your application
- You want to start with Serverless's specific tech stack and approach
- Your project aligns with Serverless's feature set
Choose Uni-Stack if:
- You prefer Uni-Stack's specific approach and features
- Your requirements match Uni-Stack's capabilities
Final Verdict: Serverless vs Uni-Stack
Both Serverless and Uni-Stack are excellent choices for building SaaS applications. Your decision should be based on your specific requirements, budget, and technical preferences.
Serverless is ideal if you're looking for a more affordable option with built-in authentication.
Uni-Stack stands out for its comprehensive feature set and is perfect for developers who need specific features.
Ultimately, both boilerplates will help you launch your SaaS product faster and more efficiently. Review the detailed comparison above, consider your project requirements, and choose the one that aligns best with your goals.
Frequently Asked Questions: Serverless vs Uni-Stack
Which is better: Serverless or Uni-Stack?
The "better" choice depends on your specific needs. Serverless excels in affordability, while Uni-Stackstands out for its feature set. Consider your budget, required features, and development timeline when making your decision.
What's the price difference between Serverless and Uni-Stack?
Serverless costs $399 while Uni-Stack is priced at Free. That's a difference of $999600. Both are one-time payments with no recurring fees, making them cost-effective long-term investments for your SaaS project.
Can I switch from Serverless to Uni-Stack later?
While technically possible, switching boilerplates mid-project is challenging and time-consuming. Each boilerplate has its own architecture, dependencies, and patterns. It's best to carefully evaluate both options now and choose the one that best fits your long-term needs to avoid costly migrations later.
Do Serverless and Uni-Stack offer similar features?
Both boilerplates offer core SaaS features, but with different implementations and additional capabilities. Check the detailed feature comparison table above to see exactly which features each boilerplate includes. Key differences include payment integrations, authentication systems, and admin panel availability.
Which boilerplate is better for beginners?
For beginners, consider factors like documentation quality, community support, and code complexity. Both Serverless and Uni-Stack are designed to be developer-friendly, but your choice should depend on your familiarity with their respective tech stacks and the learning resources available.
Are there any hidden costs with Serverless or Uni-Stack?
Both boilerplates are one-time purchases with no recurring licensing fees. However, you may incur costs for third-party services they integrate with (like payment processors, email services, or hosting platforms). These operational costs are separate from the boilerplate purchase and apply to any SaaS application.
How long does it take to launch with Serverless vs Uni-Stack?
Both boilerplates significantly reduce development time compared to building from scratch. Depending on your customization needs, you could launch a basic SaaS product in days or weeks rather than months. The exact timeline depends on your specific requirements, team size, and development experience.
Explore More Comparisons
Browse all boilerplates and find the perfect starter kit for your SaaS project.