Rocket Launch vs Serverless

When choosing between Rocket Launch and Serverless, it's essential to understand the key differences that make each boilerplate unique. Both are excellent choices for building SaaS applications, but they cater to different needs and development approaches.

What is Rocket Launch?

Rocketlaunch is a paid SaaS boilerplate built on Next.js + TypeScript + modern web tools. It aims to help developers launch a full SaaS‑style application quickly by providing a pre‑wired foundation covering many of the repetitive parts most apps share. With Rocketlaunch you receive user authentication (via Clerk including email/password, social login, magic‑link, and full user management), subscription and payment support (via Stripe both one‑time and recurring), a backend + database setup (with Prisma + Supabase), and a ready‑to‑use frontend & UI system built with Tailwind CSS and modern UI components. You also get a landing‑page template (for marketing or public presence), account management pages, protected API routes, and a structure that handles many typical SaaS flows authentication, paid subscriptions, user data, and database interactions. The license allows using the boilerplate code for unlimited projects once purchased. Choosing Rocketlaunch means working within its tech stack and architectural decisions: Next.js, Clerk for auth, Supabase/Prisma for database, Stripe for billing, and the provided UI/layout/components system. That makes initial setup faster and removes repetitive boilerplate but also ties you to those tools and decisions, which may limit flexibility if you later want to swap major components. The codebase is more opinionated and potentially heavier than a minimal starter template great for full‑featured SaaS apps, but possibly overkill for simpler projects, prototypes or highly customized apps.

Developed by Samuel Benhamou, Rocket Launch has become a popular choice among developers looking for a reliable starting point for their SaaS projects.

What is Serverless?

Serverless.page is a full‑stack boilerplate / starter‑kit built on Next.js + React + Firebase + Stripe that aims to accelerate the process of launching a SaaS application. The kit provides essentials such as user authentication, subscription-based payment flows via Stripe, and a content structure including a landing page, blog, and built‑in CMS. It also includes support for team or workspace management (user accounts + team invites), transactional email integrations, and an admin dashboard - everything that typically takes time to wire up is pre‑configured. Because the project uses a serverless infrastructure (Firebase + Next.js), it promises scalability and cost-effectiveness, so there is no need to manage dedicated servers, and billing scale is based on actual usage. Adopting Serverless.page means committing to its stack: Next.js + React + Firebase + Stripe + the provided codebase structure. That gives speed to launch and many built‑in SaaS features, but reduces flexibility if you need a very custom backend, different database, or special integrations. Since it's “full‑featured,” it might feel heavyweight for smaller projects or very basic prototypes. You may end up with more dependencies and configuration than strictly needed if your use case is simple.

Created by Garrett Pierson, Serverless offers a robust foundation for building scalable SaaS applications.

When building a SaaS application, choosing the right payment integration is crucial for monetization success. Let's compare the payment options available in Rocket Launch and Serverless.

Both Rocket Launch and Serverless are excellent choices for building SaaS applications. Your decision should be based on your specific requirements, budget, and technical preferences.

Rocket Launch is ideal if you're looking for a more affordable option with built-in authentication.

Serverless stands out for its comprehensive feature set and is perfect for developers who need authentication.

Ultimately, both boilerplates will help you launch your SaaS product faster and more efficiently. Review the detailed comparison above, consider your project requirements, and choose the one that aligns best with your goals.