Detailed Comparison 2025
ProtonStack vs Zexa Next
Compare ProtonStack and Zexa Next side-by-side. We've analyzed features, pricing, and capabilities to help you choose the best boilerplate for your SaaS project.
Quick Overview
ProtonStack
ProtonStack is a full‑stack boilerplate built with Next.js + React + TypeScript + Tailwind CSS, designed to give developers a ready‑made foundation for SaaS and web applications. Out of the box, ProtonStack includes a production‑ready authentication and user‑management system via Clerk.dev, database integration through Prisma (with support for various databases, including Postgres, MySQL, or scalable services like PlanetScale or Supabase), subscription and payment workflows via Stripe, multitenancy (organizations/teams support), plus a UI kit built with component libraries like Shadcn UI / Radix UI. ProtonStack also provides strong developer tooling: linting/formatting (ESLint, Prettier), commit‑hooks (with Husky), schema validation (via Zod), unit and end‑to‑end testing setup (with Jest, React Testing Library, and Cypress), plus built-in support for a blog or documentation using MDX useful for marketing or public‑facing content.
Key Features
Zexa Next
ZexaNext is a full‑featured Next.js boilerplate built for SaaS developers and startups who want to launch modern web apps quickly and reliably. It combines robust authentication (email/password, social login, password recovery), PostgreSQL database with Prisma ORM, payment and subscription handling via Stripe, email integration via Resend, and support for responsive landing pages styled with Tailwind CSS. ZexaNext also delivers built‑in features such as dark mode, a markdown‑based blog and documentation system, SEO‑optimized pages, and animated UI components using shadcn/ui and Framer Motion. Its default configuration is optimized for performance and SEO thanks to Next.js server‑side rendering and integrated analytics support. With ZexaNext you skip repetitive boilerplate code and get a scalable, production‑ready foundation from day one — allowing you to focus on building unique product logic and bringing your SaaS idea to market fast.
Key Features
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | ProtonStack$99 | Zexa Next$49 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $99 | $49 |
| Developer | Ozan Yildirim | ZexaNext |
| Authentication | ||
| Stripe Integration | ||
| Paddle Integration | ||
| Lemon Squeezy | ||
| Dodo Payments | ||
| Polar | ||
| Creem | ||
| Admin Panel | ||
| User Dashboard | ||
| Subscriptions | ||
| Blog | ||
| SEO Optimized | ||
| Documentation | ||
| Support | ||
| Tailwind CSS | ||
| API | ||
| Two-Factor Auth | ||
| Multi-Tenancy | ||
| Teams | ||
| Shadcn UI | ||
| View Details | View Page | View Page |
ProtonStack vs Zexa Next: Detailed Analysis
When choosing between ProtonStack and Zexa Next, it's essential to understand the key differences that make each boilerplate unique. Both are excellent choices for building SaaS applications, but they cater to different needs and development approaches.
What is ProtonStack?
ProtonStack is a full‑stack boilerplate built with Next.js + React + TypeScript + Tailwind CSS, designed to give developers a ready‑made foundation for SaaS and web applications. Out of the box, ProtonStack includes a production‑ready authentication and user‑management system via Clerk.dev, database integration through Prisma (with support for various databases, including Postgres, MySQL, or scalable services like PlanetScale or Supabase), subscription and payment workflows via Stripe, multitenancy (organizations/teams support), plus a UI kit built with component libraries like Shadcn UI / Radix UI. ProtonStack also provides strong developer tooling: linting/formatting (ESLint, Prettier), commit‑hooks (with Husky), schema validation (via Zod), unit and end‑to‑end testing setup (with Jest, React Testing Library, and Cypress), plus built-in support for a blog or documentation using MDX useful for marketing or public‑facing content.
Developed by Ozan Yildirim, ProtonStack has become a popular choice among developers looking for a reliable starting point for their SaaS projects.
What is Zexa Next?
ZexaNext is a full‑featured Next.js boilerplate built for SaaS developers and startups who want to launch modern web apps quickly and reliably. It combines robust authentication (email/password, social login, password recovery), PostgreSQL database with Prisma ORM, payment and subscription handling via Stripe, email integration via Resend, and support for responsive landing pages styled with Tailwind CSS. ZexaNext also delivers built‑in features such as dark mode, a markdown‑based blog and documentation system, SEO‑optimized pages, and animated UI components using shadcn/ui and Framer Motion. Its default configuration is optimized for performance and SEO thanks to Next.js server‑side rendering and integrated analytics support. With ZexaNext you skip repetitive boilerplate code and get a scalable, production‑ready foundation from day one — allowing you to focus on building unique product logic and bringing your SaaS idea to market fast.
Created by ZexaNext, Zexa Next offers a robust foundation for building scalable SaaS applications.
Need to Promote Your Startup or Boilerplate?
Check out LaunchDirectories.com to get your startup or boilerplate listed in 100+ product launch directories and gain valuable backlinks from high-authority platforms. This is especially effective for new products looking to quickly build domain authority and gain backlinks.
Payment Integration: ProtonStack vs Zexa Next
Key Differences Between ProtonStack and Zexa Next
💰 Pricing
ProtonStack is priced at $99, while Zexa Next costs $49. Zexa Next offers better value at a lower price point, saving you 50 dollars.
⚡ Features & Capabilities
Both boilerplates include authentication systems, making it easy to implement user login and registration.
Payment processing is available in both options. ProtonStack supports Stripe, while Zexa Next integrates with Stripe.
Both include admin panels for managing your application.
🎯 Best Use Cases
ProtonStack
- • SaaS startups looking for quick deployment
- • Projects requiring authentication
- • Teams with limited budgets
- • Multi-tenant applications
Zexa Next
- • SaaS applications needing rapid development
- • Projects requiring authentication
- • Teams with limited budgets
When to Choose ProtonStack vs Zexa Next
Choose ProtonStack if:
- You're building a multi-tenant SaaS application
- You want to start with ProtonStack's specific tech stack and approach
- Your project aligns with ProtonStack's feature set
Choose Zexa Next if:
- You're looking for the most cost-effective solution
- You prefer Zexa Next's specific approach and features
- Your requirements match Zexa Next's capabilities
Final Verdict: ProtonStack vs Zexa Next
Both ProtonStack and Zexa Next are excellent choices for building SaaS applications. Your decision should be based on your specific requirements, budget, and technical preferences.
ProtonStack is ideal if you're looking for a feature-rich solution with built-in authentication.
Zexa Next stands out for its competitive pricing and is perfect for developers who need authentication.
Ultimately, both boilerplates will help you launch your SaaS product faster and more efficiently. Review the detailed comparison above, consider your project requirements, and choose the one that aligns best with your goals.
Frequently Asked Questions: ProtonStack vs Zexa Next
Which is better: ProtonStack or Zexa Next?
The "better" choice depends on your specific needs. ProtonStack excels in comprehensive features, while Zexa Nextstands out for value pricing. Consider your budget, required features, and development timeline when making your decision.
What's the price difference between ProtonStack and Zexa Next?
ProtonStack costs $99 while Zexa Next is priced at $49. That's a difference of $50. Both are one-time payments with no recurring fees, making them cost-effective long-term investments for your SaaS project.
Can I switch from ProtonStack to Zexa Next later?
While technically possible, switching boilerplates mid-project is challenging and time-consuming. Each boilerplate has its own architecture, dependencies, and patterns. It's best to carefully evaluate both options now and choose the one that best fits your long-term needs to avoid costly migrations later.
Do ProtonStack and Zexa Next offer similar features?
Both boilerplates offer core SaaS features, but with different implementations and additional capabilities. Check the detailed feature comparison table above to see exactly which features each boilerplate includes. Key differences include payment integrations, authentication systems, and admin panel availability.
Which boilerplate is better for beginners?
For beginners, consider factors like documentation quality, community support, and code complexity. Both ProtonStack and Zexa Next are designed to be developer-friendly, but your choice should depend on your familiarity with their respective tech stacks and the learning resources available.
Are there any hidden costs with ProtonStack or Zexa Next?
Both boilerplates are one-time purchases with no recurring licensing fees. However, you may incur costs for third-party services they integrate with (like payment processors, email services, or hosting platforms). These operational costs are separate from the boilerplate purchase and apply to any SaaS application.
How long does it take to launch with ProtonStack vs Zexa Next?
Both boilerplates significantly reduce development time compared to building from scratch. Depending on your customization needs, you could launch a basic SaaS product in days or weeks rather than months. The exact timeline depends on your specific requirements, team size, and development experience.
Explore More Comparisons
Browse all boilerplates and find the perfect starter kit for your SaaS project.