Detailed Comparison 2025
ProtonStack vs Supanuxt
Compare ProtonStack and Supanuxt side-by-side. We've analyzed features, pricing, and capabilities to help you choose the best boilerplate for your SaaS project.
Quick Overview
ProtonStack
ProtonStack is a full‑stack boilerplate built with Next.js + React + TypeScript + Tailwind CSS, designed to give developers a ready‑made foundation for SaaS and web applications. Out of the box, ProtonStack includes a production‑ready authentication and user‑management system via Clerk.dev, database integration through Prisma (with support for various databases, including Postgres, MySQL, or scalable services like PlanetScale or Supabase), subscription and payment workflows via Stripe, multitenancy (organizations/teams support), plus a UI kit built with component libraries like Shadcn UI / Radix UI. ProtonStack also provides strong developer tooling: linting/formatting (ESLint, Prettier), commit‑hooks (with Husky), schema validation (via Zod), unit and end‑to‑end testing setup (with Jest, React Testing Library, and Cypress), plus built-in support for a blog or documentation using MDX useful for marketing or public‑facing content.
Key Features
Supanuxt
This SAAS boilerplate is designed to streamline development using modern technologies like Nuxt3, Supabase, and Prisma. It emphasizes separation of concerns and avoiding vendor lock-in, opting for Prisma over Supabase API for database management, and TRPC over REST for efficient client-server communication. The template integrates Stripe for payment processing and supports OAuth via Supabase for authentication. Tailored for flexibility, it uses the Composition API across components and stores, ensuring a consistent approach. Deployment is simplified through Netlify, with detailed guidance on environment setup. This boilerplate serves as a robust starting point for building scalable SAAS applications.
Key Features
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | ProtonStack$99 | SupanuxtFree |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $99 | Free |
| Developer | Ozan Yildirim | Michael Dausmann |
| Authentication | ||
| Stripe Integration | ||
| Paddle Integration | ||
| Lemon Squeezy | ||
| Dodo Payments | ||
| Polar | ||
| Creem | ||
| Admin Panel | ||
| User Dashboard | ||
| Subscriptions | ||
| Blog | ||
| SEO Optimized | ||
| Documentation | ||
| Support | ||
| Tailwind CSS | ||
| API | ||
| Two-Factor Auth | ||
| Multi-Tenancy | ||
| Teams | ||
| Shadcn UI | ||
| View Details | View Page | View Page |
ProtonStack vs Supanuxt: Detailed Analysis
When choosing between ProtonStack and Supanuxt, it's essential to understand the key differences that make each boilerplate unique. Both are excellent choices for building SaaS applications, but they cater to different needs and development approaches.
What is ProtonStack?
ProtonStack is a full‑stack boilerplate built with Next.js + React + TypeScript + Tailwind CSS, designed to give developers a ready‑made foundation for SaaS and web applications. Out of the box, ProtonStack includes a production‑ready authentication and user‑management system via Clerk.dev, database integration through Prisma (with support for various databases, including Postgres, MySQL, or scalable services like PlanetScale or Supabase), subscription and payment workflows via Stripe, multitenancy (organizations/teams support), plus a UI kit built with component libraries like Shadcn UI / Radix UI. ProtonStack also provides strong developer tooling: linting/formatting (ESLint, Prettier), commit‑hooks (with Husky), schema validation (via Zod), unit and end‑to‑end testing setup (with Jest, React Testing Library, and Cypress), plus built-in support for a blog or documentation using MDX useful for marketing or public‑facing content.
Developed by Ozan Yildirim, ProtonStack has become a popular choice among developers looking for a reliable starting point for their SaaS projects.
What is Supanuxt?
This SAAS boilerplate is designed to streamline development using modern technologies like Nuxt3, Supabase, and Prisma. It emphasizes separation of concerns and avoiding vendor lock-in, opting for Prisma over Supabase API for database management, and TRPC over REST for efficient client-server communication. The template integrates Stripe for payment processing and supports OAuth via Supabase for authentication. Tailored for flexibility, it uses the Composition API across components and stores, ensuring a consistent approach. Deployment is simplified through Netlify, with detailed guidance on environment setup. This boilerplate serves as a robust starting point for building scalable SAAS applications.
Created by Michael Dausmann, Supanuxt offers a robust foundation for building scalable SaaS applications.
Need to Promote Your Startup or Boilerplate?
Check out LaunchDirectories.com to get your startup or boilerplate listed in 100+ product launch directories and gain valuable backlinks from high-authority platforms. This is especially effective for new products looking to quickly build domain authority and gain backlinks.
Payment Integration: ProtonStack vs Supanuxt
Key Differences Between ProtonStack and Supanuxt
💰 Pricing
ProtonStack is priced at $99, while Supanuxt costs Free. This makes ProtonStack the more budget-friendly option, potentially saving you 999900 dollars.
⚡ Features & Capabilities
Both boilerplates include authentication systems, making it easy to implement user login and registration.
Payment processing is available in both options. ProtonStack supports Stripe, while Supanuxt integrates with Stripe.
ProtonStack includes an admin panel, giving you more control out of the box.
🎯 Best Use Cases
ProtonStack
- • SaaS startups looking for quick deployment
- • Projects requiring authentication
- • Teams with limited budgets
- • Multi-tenant applications
Supanuxt
- • SaaS applications needing rapid development
- • Projects requiring authentication
- • Teams with flexible budgets
When to Choose ProtonStack vs Supanuxt
Choose ProtonStack if:
- You're looking for the most cost-effective solution
- You require an admin panel for managing your application
- You're building a multi-tenant SaaS application
- You want to start with ProtonStack's specific tech stack and approach
- Your project aligns with ProtonStack's feature set
Choose Supanuxt if:
- You prefer Supanuxt's specific approach and features
- Your requirements match Supanuxt's capabilities
Final Verdict: ProtonStack vs Supanuxt
Both ProtonStack and Supanuxt are excellent choices for building SaaS applications. Your decision should be based on your specific requirements, budget, and technical preferences.
ProtonStack is ideal if you're looking for a more affordable option with built-in authentication.
Supanuxt stands out for its comprehensive feature set and is perfect for developers who need authentication.
Ultimately, both boilerplates will help you launch your SaaS product faster and more efficiently. Review the detailed comparison above, consider your project requirements, and choose the one that aligns best with your goals.
Frequently Asked Questions: ProtonStack vs Supanuxt
Which is better: ProtonStack or Supanuxt?
The "better" choice depends on your specific needs. ProtonStack excels in affordability, while Supanuxtstands out for its feature set. Consider your budget, required features, and development timeline when making your decision.
What's the price difference between ProtonStack and Supanuxt?
ProtonStack costs $99 while Supanuxt is priced at Free. That's a difference of $999900. Both are one-time payments with no recurring fees, making them cost-effective long-term investments for your SaaS project.
Can I switch from ProtonStack to Supanuxt later?
While technically possible, switching boilerplates mid-project is challenging and time-consuming. Each boilerplate has its own architecture, dependencies, and patterns. It's best to carefully evaluate both options now and choose the one that best fits your long-term needs to avoid costly migrations later.
Do ProtonStack and Supanuxt offer similar features?
Both boilerplates offer core SaaS features, but with different implementations and additional capabilities. Check the detailed feature comparison table above to see exactly which features each boilerplate includes. Key differences include payment integrations, authentication systems, and admin panel availability.
Which boilerplate is better for beginners?
For beginners, consider factors like documentation quality, community support, and code complexity. Both ProtonStack and Supanuxt are designed to be developer-friendly, but your choice should depend on your familiarity with their respective tech stacks and the learning resources available.
Are there any hidden costs with ProtonStack or Supanuxt?
Both boilerplates are one-time purchases with no recurring licensing fees. However, you may incur costs for third-party services they integrate with (like payment processors, email services, or hosting platforms). These operational costs are separate from the boilerplate purchase and apply to any SaaS application.
How long does it take to launch with ProtonStack vs Supanuxt?
Both boilerplates significantly reduce development time compared to building from scratch. Depending on your customization needs, you could launch a basic SaaS product in days or weeks rather than months. The exact timeline depends on your specific requirements, team size, and development experience.
Explore More Comparisons
Browse all boilerplates and find the perfect starter kit for your SaaS project.