ProtonStack vs Supaboost

When choosing between ProtonStack and Supaboost, it's essential to understand the key differences that make each boilerplate unique. Both are excellent choices for building SaaS applications, but they cater to different needs and development approaches.

What is ProtonStack?

ProtonStack is a full‑stack boilerplate built with Next.js + React + TypeScript + Tailwind CSS, designed to give developers a ready‑made foundation for SaaS and web applications. Out of the box, ProtonStack includes a production‑ready authentication and user‑management system via Clerk.dev, database integration through Prisma (with support for various databases, including Postgres, MySQL, or scalable services like PlanetScale or Supabase), subscription and payment workflows via Stripe, multitenancy (organizations/teams support), plus a UI kit built with component libraries like Shadcn UI / Radix UI. ProtonStack also provides strong developer tooling: linting/formatting (ESLint, Prettier), commit‑hooks (with Husky), schema validation (via Zod), unit and end‑to‑end testing setup (with Jest, React Testing Library, and Cypress), plus built-in support for a blog or documentation using MDX useful for marketing or public‑facing content.

Developed by Ozan Yildirim, ProtonStack has become a popular choice among developers looking for a reliable starting point for their SaaS projects.

What is Supaboost?

Supaboost is a full‑stack SaaS starter kit built on Next.js (version 14) and Supabase designed to accelerate building web apps, marketplaces or SaaS products by providing a ready‑to‑use foundation. Out of the box, Supaboost includes: secure user authentication and role‑based user/organization management, a working PostgreSQL‑based database schema (with row‑level security), subscription and payment integration via LemonSqueezy for subscriptions and transactions, and a clean, maintainable codebase using TypeScript + modern UI built with Shadcn UI. On top of backend & auth/payment plumbing it provides basic UI scaffolding, data‑visualization tools (using e.g. Recharts), form management support (via TanStack Forms) and integrations helpful for building SaaS‑style features quickly. On the trade‑off side: adopting Supaboost means committing to its stac: Next.js + Supabase + LemonSqueezy + the provided UI/layout + conventions. If your project requires a radically different backend, non‑SQL database, or custom payment flow, you may need to rework significant parts. Also, while it offers many integrations, relying heavily on the boilerplate may mean inheriting its assumptions (schema, auth structure, payment model), which might not fit all projects. Finally like any “all-in-one” starter, the feature richness may be overkill for very simple apps or prototypes.

Created by Lee, Supaboost offers a robust foundation for building scalable SaaS applications.

When building a SaaS application, choosing the right payment integration is crucial for monetization success. Let's compare the payment options available in ProtonStack and Supaboost.

Both ProtonStack and Supaboost are excellent choices for building SaaS applications. Your decision should be based on your specific requirements, budget, and technical preferences.

ProtonStack is ideal if you're looking for a more affordable option with built-in authentication.

Supaboost stands out for its comprehensive feature set and is perfect for developers who need authentication.

Ultimately, both boilerplates will help you launch your SaaS product faster and more efficiently. Review the detailed comparison above, consider your project requirements, and choose the one that aligns best with your goals.