Detailed Comparison 2025
NextJet vs SwiftShip
Compare NextJet and SwiftShip side-by-side. We've analyzed features, pricing, and capabilities to help you choose the best boilerplate for your SaaS project.
Quick Overview

NextJet
NextJet is a full‑stack SaaS boilerplate built with Next.js, TypeScript and modern web‑app tooling, made to give developers a solid, production‑ready foundation when building subscription‑based or SaaS‑style applications. Out of the box it handles core infrastructure: user authentication + authorization (including OAuth and magic‑link support), payment/subscription logic via Stripe or Lemon Squeezy, and pre‑built user dashboards + admin panel. It also includes content‑management and marketing‑side features: a blog and documentation system using MDX, a customizable landing/marketing site, email templates, and onboarding flows. The project follows a modular, maintainable architecture (monorepo via Turborepo, clean folder structure, typesafety via TypeScript), which helps keep code organized, useful if you plan to grow or scale the app over time. Because much of the “plumbing” is already configured, you can skip repetitive setup and get to building your product‑specific logic faster. At the same time, using NextJet means trusting its built‑in architecture, tech stack and conventions. If your project needs a very different stack, unusual backend/data requirements or a minimal footprint, you might need to refactor or drop parts of what comes with the boilerplate.
Key Features

SwiftShip
SwiftShip is a premium SwiftUI boilerplate for iOS developers aiming to build and ship native mobile apps in days rather than weeks. It delivers a ready‑to‑use project foundation with pre-built essential mobile app features: user onboarding (splash screen, single- or multi‑step onboarding), authentication (email/password, magic‑link login, Supabase integration), in‑app monetization (in‑app purchases and subscription paywalls via RevenueCat), analytics (with integrations like Mixpanel or TelemetryDeck), push notifications (via OneSignal), dark‑mode UI, iPad compatibility, Lottie animations, settings screens, secure config management and a suite of utility components. Built with production‑ready standards in SwiftUI, SwiftShip offers modularity and full customizability — you can easily adapt and extend the code base to match your project’s unique requirements. The boilerplate is actively maintained and regularly updated by its author, so you benefit from ongoing improvements and compatibility with the latest iOS/Xcode versions.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | NextJet$69 | SwiftShip$129 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $69 | $129 |
| Developer | Renas Hassan | Moustaid Ayoub |
| Authentication | ||
| Stripe Integration | ||
| Paddle Integration | ||
| Lemon Squeezy | ||
| Dodo Payments | ||
| Polar | ||
| Creem | ||
| Admin Panel | ||
| User Dashboard | ||
| Subscriptions | ||
| Blog | ||
| SEO Optimized | ||
| Documentation | ||
| Support | ||
| Tailwind CSS | ||
| API | ||
| Two-Factor Auth | ||
| Multi-Tenancy | ||
| Teams | ||
| Shadcn UI | ||
| View Details | View Page | View Page |
NextJet vs SwiftShip: Detailed Analysis
When choosing between NextJet and SwiftShip, it's essential to understand the key differences that make each boilerplate unique. Both are excellent choices for building SaaS applications, but they cater to different needs and development approaches.
What is NextJet?
NextJet is a full‑stack SaaS boilerplate built with Next.js, TypeScript and modern web‑app tooling, made to give developers a solid, production‑ready foundation when building subscription‑based or SaaS‑style applications. Out of the box it handles core infrastructure: user authentication + authorization (including OAuth and magic‑link support), payment/subscription logic via Stripe or Lemon Squeezy, and pre‑built user dashboards + admin panel. It also includes content‑management and marketing‑side features: a blog and documentation system using MDX, a customizable landing/marketing site, email templates, and onboarding flows. The project follows a modular, maintainable architecture (monorepo via Turborepo, clean folder structure, typesafety via TypeScript), which helps keep code organized, useful if you plan to grow or scale the app over time. Because much of the “plumbing” is already configured, you can skip repetitive setup and get to building your product‑specific logic faster. At the same time, using NextJet means trusting its built‑in architecture, tech stack and conventions. If your project needs a very different stack, unusual backend/data requirements or a minimal footprint, you might need to refactor or drop parts of what comes with the boilerplate.
Developed by Renas Hassan, NextJet has become a popular choice among developers looking for a reliable starting point for their SaaS projects.
What is SwiftShip?
SwiftShip is a premium SwiftUI boilerplate for iOS developers aiming to build and ship native mobile apps in days rather than weeks. It delivers a ready‑to‑use project foundation with pre-built essential mobile app features: user onboarding (splash screen, single- or multi‑step onboarding), authentication (email/password, magic‑link login, Supabase integration), in‑app monetization (in‑app purchases and subscription paywalls via RevenueCat), analytics (with integrations like Mixpanel or TelemetryDeck), push notifications (via OneSignal), dark‑mode UI, iPad compatibility, Lottie animations, settings screens, secure config management and a suite of utility components. Built with production‑ready standards in SwiftUI, SwiftShip offers modularity and full customizability — you can easily adapt and extend the code base to match your project’s unique requirements. The boilerplate is actively maintained and regularly updated by its author, so you benefit from ongoing improvements and compatibility with the latest iOS/Xcode versions.
Created by Moustaid Ayoub, SwiftShip offers a robust foundation for building scalable SaaS applications.
Need to Promote Your Startup or Boilerplate?

Check out LaunchDirectories.com to get your startup or boilerplate listed in 100+ product launch directories and gain valuable backlinks from high-authority platforms. This is especially effective for new products looking to quickly build domain authority and gain backlinks.
Payment Integration: NextJet vs SwiftShip
When building a SaaS application, choosing the right payment integration is crucial for monetization success. Let's compare the payment options available in NextJet and SwiftShip.
NextJet Payment Options
NextJet supports Stripe.
Key Differences Between NextJet and SwiftShip
💰 Pricing
NextJet is priced at $69, while SwiftShip costs $129. This makes NextJet the more budget-friendly option, potentially saving you 60 dollars.
⚡ Features & Capabilities
NextJet includes authentication, while SwiftShip does not, which could be a deciding factor for user-focused applications.
NextJet includes an admin panel, giving you more control out of the box.
🎯 Best Use Cases
NextJet
- • SaaS startups looking for quick deployment
- • Projects requiring authentication
- • Teams with limited budgets
SwiftShip
- • SaaS applications needing rapid development
- • Projects requiring custom features
- • Teams with limited budgets
When to Choose NextJet vs SwiftShip
Choose NextJet if:
- You're looking for the most cost-effective solution
- You need built-in authentication out of the box
- You require an admin panel for managing your application
- You want to start with NextJet's specific tech stack and approach
- Your project aligns with NextJet's feature set
Choose SwiftShip if:
- You prefer SwiftShip's specific approach and features
- Your requirements match SwiftShip's capabilities
Final Verdict: NextJet vs SwiftShip
Both NextJet and SwiftShip are excellent choices for building SaaS applications. Your decision should be based on your specific requirements, budget, and technical preferences.
NextJet is ideal if you're looking for a more affordable option with built-in authentication.
SwiftShip stands out for its comprehensive feature set and is perfect for developers who need specific features.
Ultimately, both boilerplates will help you launch your SaaS product faster and more efficiently. Review the detailed comparison above, consider your project requirements, and choose the one that aligns best with your goals.
Frequently Asked Questions: NextJet vs SwiftShip
Which is better: NextJet or SwiftShip?
The "better" choice depends on your specific needs. NextJet excels in affordability, while SwiftShipstands out for its feature set. Consider your budget, required features, and development timeline when making your decision.
What's the price difference between NextJet and SwiftShip?
NextJet costs $69 while SwiftShip is priced at $129. That's a difference of $60. Both are one-time payments with no recurring fees, making them cost-effective long-term investments for your SaaS project.
Can I switch from NextJet to SwiftShip later?
While technically possible, switching boilerplates mid-project is challenging and time-consuming. Each boilerplate has its own architecture, dependencies, and patterns. It's best to carefully evaluate both options now and choose the one that best fits your long-term needs to avoid costly migrations later.
Do NextJet and SwiftShip offer similar features?
Both boilerplates offer core SaaS features, but with different implementations and additional capabilities. Check the detailed feature comparison table above to see exactly which features each boilerplate includes. Key differences include payment integrations, authentication systems, and admin panel availability.
Which boilerplate is better for beginners?
For beginners, consider factors like documentation quality, community support, and code complexity. Both NextJet and SwiftShip are designed to be developer-friendly, but your choice should depend on your familiarity with their respective tech stacks and the learning resources available.
Are there any hidden costs with NextJet or SwiftShip?
Both boilerplates are one-time purchases with no recurring licensing fees. However, you may incur costs for third-party services they integrate with (like payment processors, email services, or hosting platforms). These operational costs are separate from the boilerplate purchase and apply to any SaaS application.
How long does it take to launch with NextJet vs SwiftShip?
Both boilerplates significantly reduce development time compared to building from scratch. Depending on your customization needs, you could launch a basic SaaS product in days or weeks rather than months. The exact timeline depends on your specific requirements, team size, and development experience.
Explore More Comparisons
Browse all boilerplates and find the perfect starter kit for your SaaS project.