Detailed Comparison 2025

NextJet vs Serverless

Compare NextJet and Serverless side-by-side. We've analyzed features, pricing, and capabilities to help you choose the best boilerplate for your SaaS project.

Quick Overview

Best Value
NextJet screenshot

NextJet

NextJet is a full‑stack SaaS boilerplate built with Next.js, TypeScript and modern web‑app tooling, made to give developers a solid, production‑ready foundation when building subscription‑based or SaaS‑style applications. Out of the box it handles core infrastructure: user authentication + authorization (including OAuth and magic‑link support), payment/subscription logic via Stripe or Lemon Squeezy, and pre‑built user dashboards + admin panel. It also includes content‑management and marketing‑side features: a blog and documentation system using MDX, a customizable landing/marketing site, email templates, and onboarding flows. The project follows a modular, maintainable architecture (monorepo via Turborepo, clean folder structure, typesafety via TypeScript), which helps keep code organized, useful if you plan to grow or scale the app over time. Because much of the “plumbing” is already configured, you can skip repetitive setup and get to building your product‑specific logic faster. At the same time, using NextJet means trusting its built‑in architecture, tech stack and conventions. If your project needs a very different stack, unusual backend/data requirements or a minimal footprint, you might need to refactor or drop parts of what comes with the boilerplate.

$69
by Renas Hassan
Visit Website

Key Features

AuthenticationStripeAdmin PanelDashboardSubscriptionsBlog

Serverless

Serverless.page is a full‑stack boilerplate / starter‑kit built on Next.js + React + Firebase + Stripe that aims to accelerate the process of launching a SaaS application. The kit provides essentials such as user authentication, subscription-based payment flows via Stripe, and a content structure including a landing page, blog, and built‑in CMS. It also includes support for team or workspace management (user accounts + team invites), transactional email integrations, and an admin dashboard - everything that typically takes time to wire up is pre‑configured. Because the project uses a serverless infrastructure (Firebase + Next.js), it promises scalability and cost-effectiveness, so there is no need to manage dedicated servers, and billing scale is based on actual usage. Adopting Serverless.page means committing to its stack: Next.js + React + Firebase + Stripe + the provided codebase structure. That gives speed to launch and many built‑in SaaS features, but reduces flexibility if you need a very custom backend, different database, or special integrations. Since it's “full‑featured,” it might feel heavyweight for smaller projects or very basic prototypes. You may end up with more dependencies and configuration than strictly needed if your use case is simple.

$399
by Garrett Pierson
Visit Website

Key Features

AuthenticationStripeAdmin PanelDashboardSubscriptionsBlog

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Feature
NextJet$69
Serverless$399
Price$69$399
DeveloperRenas HassanGarrett Pierson
Authentication
Stripe Integration
Paddle Integration
Lemon Squeezy
Dodo Payments
Polar
Creem
Admin Panel
User Dashboard
Subscriptions
Blog
SEO Optimized
Documentation
Support
Tailwind CSS
API
Two-Factor Auth
Multi-Tenancy
Teams
Shadcn UI
View DetailsView PageView Page

NextJet vs Serverless: Detailed Analysis

When choosing between NextJet and Serverless, it's essential to understand the key differences that make each boilerplate unique. Both are excellent choices for building SaaS applications, but they cater to different needs and development approaches.

What is NextJet?

NextJet is a full‑stack SaaS boilerplate built with Next.js, TypeScript and modern web‑app tooling, made to give developers a solid, production‑ready foundation when building subscription‑based or SaaS‑style applications. Out of the box it handles core infrastructure: user authentication + authorization (including OAuth and magic‑link support), payment/subscription logic via Stripe or Lemon Squeezy, and pre‑built user dashboards + admin panel. It also includes content‑management and marketing‑side features: a blog and documentation system using MDX, a customizable landing/marketing site, email templates, and onboarding flows. The project follows a modular, maintainable architecture (monorepo via Turborepo, clean folder structure, typesafety via TypeScript), which helps keep code organized, useful if you plan to grow or scale the app over time. Because much of the “plumbing” is already configured, you can skip repetitive setup and get to building your product‑specific logic faster. At the same time, using NextJet means trusting its built‑in architecture, tech stack and conventions. If your project needs a very different stack, unusual backend/data requirements or a minimal footprint, you might need to refactor or drop parts of what comes with the boilerplate.

Developed by Renas Hassan, NextJet has become a popular choice among developers looking for a reliable starting point for their SaaS projects.

What is Serverless?

Serverless.page is a full‑stack boilerplate / starter‑kit built on Next.js + React + Firebase + Stripe that aims to accelerate the process of launching a SaaS application. The kit provides essentials such as user authentication, subscription-based payment flows via Stripe, and a content structure including a landing page, blog, and built‑in CMS. It also includes support for team or workspace management (user accounts + team invites), transactional email integrations, and an admin dashboard - everything that typically takes time to wire up is pre‑configured. Because the project uses a serverless infrastructure (Firebase + Next.js), it promises scalability and cost-effectiveness, so there is no need to manage dedicated servers, and billing scale is based on actual usage. Adopting Serverless.page means committing to its stack: Next.js + React + Firebase + Stripe + the provided codebase structure. That gives speed to launch and many built‑in SaaS features, but reduces flexibility if you need a very custom backend, different database, or special integrations. Since it's “full‑featured,” it might feel heavyweight for smaller projects or very basic prototypes. You may end up with more dependencies and configuration than strictly needed if your use case is simple.

Created by Garrett Pierson, Serverless offers a robust foundation for building scalable SaaS applications.

Need to Promote Your Startup or Boilerplate?

Rainbow celebration

Check out LaunchDirectories.com to get your startup or boilerplate listed in 100+ product launch directories and gain valuable backlinks from high-authority platforms. This is especially effective for new products looking to quickly build domain authority and gain backlinks.

Payment Integration: NextJet vs Serverless

When building a SaaS application, choosing the right payment integration is crucial for monetization success. Let's compare the payment options available in NextJet and Serverless.

NextJet Payment Options

NextJet supports Stripe.

Serverless Payment Options

Serverless integrates with Stripe.

Key Differences Between NextJet and Serverless

💰 Pricing

NextJet is priced at $69, while Serverless costs $399. This makes NextJet the more budget-friendly option, potentially saving you 330 dollars.

⚡ Features & Capabilities

Both boilerplates include authentication systems, making it easy to implement user login and registration.

Payment processing is available in both options. NextJet supports Stripe, while Serverless integrates with Stripe.

Both include admin panels for managing your application.

🎯 Best Use Cases

NextJet

  • • SaaS startups looking for quick deployment
  • • Projects requiring authentication
  • • Teams with limited budgets

Serverless

  • • SaaS applications needing rapid development
  • • Projects requiring authentication
  • • Teams with flexible budgets

When to Choose NextJet vs Serverless

Choose NextJet if:

  • You're looking for the most cost-effective solution
  • You want to start with NextJet's specific tech stack and approach
  • Your project aligns with NextJet's feature set

Choose Serverless if:

  • You prefer Serverless's specific approach and features
  • Your requirements match Serverless's capabilities

Final Verdict: NextJet vs Serverless

Both NextJet and Serverless are excellent choices for building SaaS applications. Your decision should be based on your specific requirements, budget, and technical preferences.

NextJet is ideal if you're looking for a more affordable option with built-in authentication.

Serverless stands out for its comprehensive feature set and is perfect for developers who need authentication.

Ultimately, both boilerplates will help you launch your SaaS product faster and more efficiently. Review the detailed comparison above, consider your project requirements, and choose the one that aligns best with your goals.

Frequently Asked Questions: NextJet vs Serverless

Which is better: NextJet or Serverless?

The "better" choice depends on your specific needs. NextJet excels in affordability, while Serverlessstands out for its feature set. Consider your budget, required features, and development timeline when making your decision.

What's the price difference between NextJet and Serverless?

NextJet costs $69 while Serverless is priced at $399. That's a difference of $330. Both are one-time payments with no recurring fees, making them cost-effective long-term investments for your SaaS project.

Can I switch from NextJet to Serverless later?

While technically possible, switching boilerplates mid-project is challenging and time-consuming. Each boilerplate has its own architecture, dependencies, and patterns. It's best to carefully evaluate both options now and choose the one that best fits your long-term needs to avoid costly migrations later.

Do NextJet and Serverless offer similar features?

Both boilerplates offer core SaaS features, but with different implementations and additional capabilities. Check the detailed feature comparison table above to see exactly which features each boilerplate includes. Key differences include payment integrations, authentication systems, and admin panel availability.

Which boilerplate is better for beginners?

For beginners, consider factors like documentation quality, community support, and code complexity. Both NextJet and Serverless are designed to be developer-friendly, but your choice should depend on your familiarity with their respective tech stacks and the learning resources available.

Are there any hidden costs with NextJet or Serverless?

Both boilerplates are one-time purchases with no recurring licensing fees. However, you may incur costs for third-party services they integrate with (like payment processors, email services, or hosting platforms). These operational costs are separate from the boilerplate purchase and apply to any SaaS application.

How long does it take to launch with NextJet vs Serverless?

Both boilerplates significantly reduce development time compared to building from scratch. Depending on your customization needs, you could launch a basic SaaS product in days or weeks rather than months. The exact timeline depends on your specific requirements, team size, and development experience.

Explore More Comparisons

Browse all boilerplates and find the perfect starter kit for your SaaS project.