NextJet vs ReactApp

When choosing between NextJet and ReactApp, it's essential to understand the key differences that make each boilerplate unique. Both are excellent choices for building SaaS applications, but they cater to different needs and development approaches.

What is NextJet?

NextJet is a full‑stack SaaS boilerplate built with Next.js, TypeScript and modern web‑app tooling, made to give developers a solid, production‑ready foundation when building subscription‑based or SaaS‑style applications. Out of the box it handles core infrastructure: user authentication + authorization (including OAuth and magic‑link support), payment/subscription logic via Stripe or Lemon Squeezy, and pre‑built user dashboards + admin panel. It also includes content‑management and marketing‑side features: a blog and documentation system using MDX, a customizable landing/marketing site, email templates, and onboarding flows. The project follows a modular, maintainable architecture (monorepo via Turborepo, clean folder structure, typesafety via TypeScript), which helps keep code organized, useful if you plan to grow or scale the app over time. Because much of the “plumbing” is already configured, you can skip repetitive setup and get to building your product‑specific logic faster. At the same time, using NextJet means trusting its built‑in architecture, tech stack and conventions. If your project needs a very different stack, unusual backend/data requirements or a minimal footprint, you might need to refactor or drop parts of what comes with the boilerplate.

Developed by Renas Hassan, NextJet has become a popular choice among developers looking for a reliable starting point for their SaaS projects.

What is ReactApp?

ReactApp is a full‑stack SaaS starter built with React + Next.js + Firebase that aims to help developers launch web applications quickly without wiring everything manually. Its stack combines frontend (React & Next.js), UI styling (Tailwind CSS), backend and hosting (Firebase: authentication, Firestore database, serverless functions, hosting), plus built‑in infrastructure for payments (Stripe), transactional emails (Postmark), and optional utilities like a cookie banner, analytics support, and a chat widget for user interaction. With ReactApp you get a project structure where authentication flows (sign‑up/login/reset), user sessions, secure database, payment/subscription handling, and UI/layout scaffolding are already configured. This lets you skip much of the usual boilerplate: routing, backend setup, admin/user flows and go straight to building custom features.

Created by Niels Grafen, ReactApp offers a robust foundation for building scalable SaaS applications.

When building a SaaS application, choosing the right payment integration is crucial for monetization success. Let's compare the payment options available in NextJet and ReactApp.

Both NextJet and ReactApp are excellent choices for building SaaS applications. Your decision should be based on your specific requirements, budget, and technical preferences.

NextJet is ideal if you're looking for a feature-rich solution with built-in authentication.

ReactApp stands out for its competitive pricing and is perfect for developers who need authentication.

Ultimately, both boilerplates will help you launch your SaaS product faster and more efficiently. Review the detailed comparison above, consider your project requirements, and choose the one that aligns best with your goals.