NextFire vs Supaboost

When choosing between NextFire and Supaboost, it's essential to understand the key differences that make each boilerplate unique. Both are excellent choices for building SaaS applications, but they cater to different needs and development approaches.

What is NextFire?

NextFire is a boilerplate built with Next.js and Firebase designed to give developers a ready‑to‑go foundation for web apps or SaaS‑type projects. It bundles typical infrastructure: authentication, real‑time database (Firestore), storage, serverless functions, payments via Stripe, email support (via Mailgun + Firebase functions), UI components styled (e.g. with Tailwind CSS), analytics and a basic UI scaffold shortcuts to common pain points in app setup. NextFire positions itself as a way to save significant time on boilerplate: instead of wiring auth flows, database, payment logic, email, storage, and basic UI from scratch, you start with working core infrastructure so you can move straight to building your features. Using NextFire means committing to its stack (Next.js + Firebase + Stripe + the provided integrations/structure). If your project needs a custom backend, different database, or unusual architecture, you may need to refactor or replace parts. Also while it's suitable for many standard web apps and SaaS prototypes, if your needs are minimal or highly specialized, a lighter template or bespoke setup might make more sense.

Developed by Lucas Moreira, NextFire has become a popular choice among developers looking for a reliable starting point for their SaaS projects.

What is Supaboost?

Supaboost is a full‑stack SaaS starter kit built on Next.js (version 14) and Supabase designed to accelerate building web apps, marketplaces or SaaS products by providing a ready‑to‑use foundation. Out of the box, Supaboost includes: secure user authentication and role‑based user/organization management, a working PostgreSQL‑based database schema (with row‑level security), subscription and payment integration via LemonSqueezy for subscriptions and transactions, and a clean, maintainable codebase using TypeScript + modern UI built with Shadcn UI. On top of backend & auth/payment plumbing it provides basic UI scaffolding, data‑visualization tools (using e.g. Recharts), form management support (via TanStack Forms) and integrations helpful for building SaaS‑style features quickly. On the trade‑off side: adopting Supaboost means committing to its stac: Next.js + Supabase + LemonSqueezy + the provided UI/layout + conventions. If your project requires a radically different backend, non‑SQL database, or custom payment flow, you may need to rework significant parts. Also, while it offers many integrations, relying heavily on the boilerplate may mean inheriting its assumptions (schema, auth structure, payment model), which might not fit all projects. Finally like any “all-in-one” starter, the feature richness may be overkill for very simple apps or prototypes.

Created by Lee, Supaboost offers a robust foundation for building scalable SaaS applications.

When building a SaaS application, choosing the right payment integration is crucial for monetization success. Let's compare the payment options available in NextFire and Supaboost.

Both NextFire and Supaboost are excellent choices for building SaaS applications. Your decision should be based on your specific requirements, budget, and technical preferences.

NextFire is ideal if you're looking for a feature-rich solution with built-in authentication.

Supaboost stands out for its competitive pricing and is perfect for developers who need authentication.

Ultimately, both boilerplates will help you launch your SaaS product faster and more efficiently. Review the detailed comparison above, consider your project requirements, and choose the one that aligns best with your goals.