Detailed Comparison 2025
NativeFast vs ShipThatApp
Compare NativeFast and ShipThatApp side-by-side. We've analyzed features, pricing, and capabilities to help you choose the best boilerplate for your SaaS project.
Quick Overview

NativeFast
NativeFast is a Next.js boilerplate that bundles backend and frontend essentials into one codebase, offering a clean project structure, ready‑to‑use authentication, database configuration, and payment/integration support so you skip the repetitive setup when building web apps. With NativeFast you get a standard folder layout (/app, /api, /components, /models etc.), environment‑config file templates, and integration points for authentication (e.g. OAuth/social login), data storage, and payment providers (Stripe or similar), which lets you launch a scalable full‑stack application with minimal initial wiring. The structure and configuration make it convenient for developers who value speed, maintainability, and convention. Keeping frontend UI, backend API, data models and environment settings in one coherent setup. By relying on this boilerplate, you save time on boilerplate tasks and can focus on product‑specific features instead of reinventing core infrastructure.

ShipThatApp
ShipThatApp is a boilerplate / starter template built with SwiftUI for iOS (and optionally cross‑platform Swift‑based apps), designed to give a ready‑made foundation so developers don’t have to start from zero. Its aim is to accelerate the app‑building process by bundling common features and infrastructure out of the box. From the start, ShipThatApp supplies a structured SwiftUI project with onboarded flows: onboarding screens, authentication (sign‑up, login, magic‑link or email/password), payment and in‑app purchase integration for subscriptions or purchases, and built‑in monetization logic. It also includes telemetry/analytics support (user behavior tracking, performance metrics), and UI scaffolding including animations and optional AI‑integration support. That enables quicker setup for both UI and backend logic, leaving you to focus on your app’s unique features and content rather than rewriting boilerplate every time.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | NativeFast$99 | ShipThatApp$197 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $99 | $197 |
| Developer | Alessio Gherasim | Mateusz Siatrak |
| Authentication | ||
| Stripe Integration | ||
| Paddle Integration | ||
| Lemon Squeezy | ||
| Dodo Payments | ||
| Polar | ||
| Creem | ||
| Admin Panel | ||
| User Dashboard | ||
| Subscriptions | ||
| Blog | ||
| SEO Optimized | ||
| Documentation | ||
| Support | ||
| Tailwind CSS | ||
| API | ||
| Two-Factor Auth | ||
| Multi-Tenancy | ||
| Teams | ||
| Shadcn UI | ||
| View Details | View Page | View Page |
NativeFast vs ShipThatApp: Detailed Analysis
When choosing between NativeFast and ShipThatApp, it's essential to understand the key differences that make each boilerplate unique. Both are excellent choices for building SaaS applications, but they cater to different needs and development approaches.
What is NativeFast?
NativeFast is a Next.js boilerplate that bundles backend and frontend essentials into one codebase, offering a clean project structure, ready‑to‑use authentication, database configuration, and payment/integration support so you skip the repetitive setup when building web apps. With NativeFast you get a standard folder layout (/app, /api, /components, /models etc.), environment‑config file templates, and integration points for authentication (e.g. OAuth/social login), data storage, and payment providers (Stripe or similar), which lets you launch a scalable full‑stack application with minimal initial wiring. The structure and configuration make it convenient for developers who value speed, maintainability, and convention. Keeping frontend UI, backend API, data models and environment settings in one coherent setup. By relying on this boilerplate, you save time on boilerplate tasks and can focus on product‑specific features instead of reinventing core infrastructure.
Developed by Alessio Gherasim, NativeFast has become a popular choice among developers looking for a reliable starting point for their SaaS projects.
What is ShipThatApp?
ShipThatApp is a boilerplate / starter template built with SwiftUI for iOS (and optionally cross‑platform Swift‑based apps), designed to give a ready‑made foundation so developers don’t have to start from zero. Its aim is to accelerate the app‑building process by bundling common features and infrastructure out of the box. From the start, ShipThatApp supplies a structured SwiftUI project with onboarded flows: onboarding screens, authentication (sign‑up, login, magic‑link or email/password), payment and in‑app purchase integration for subscriptions or purchases, and built‑in monetization logic. It also includes telemetry/analytics support (user behavior tracking, performance metrics), and UI scaffolding including animations and optional AI‑integration support. That enables quicker setup for both UI and backend logic, leaving you to focus on your app’s unique features and content rather than rewriting boilerplate every time.
Created by Mateusz Siatrak, ShipThatApp offers a robust foundation for building scalable SaaS applications.
Need to Promote Your Startup or Boilerplate?

Check out LaunchDirectories.com to get your startup or boilerplate listed in 100+ product launch directories and gain valuable backlinks from high-authority platforms. This is especially effective for new products looking to quickly build domain authority and gain backlinks.
Payment Integration: NativeFast vs ShipThatApp
When building a SaaS application, choosing the right payment integration is crucial for monetization success. Let's compare the payment options available in NativeFast and ShipThatApp.
Neither boilerplate includes pre-built payment integrations. You'll need to implement your preferred payment solution manually. Consider using Stripe, Lemon Squeezy, or Paddle for your SaaS monetization.
Key Differences Between NativeFast and ShipThatApp
💰 Pricing
NativeFast is priced at $99, while ShipThatApp costs $197. This makes NativeFast the more budget-friendly option, potentially saving you 98 dollars.
⚡ Features & Capabilities
🎯 Best Use Cases
NativeFast
- • SaaS startups looking for quick deployment
- • Projects requiring custom features
- • Teams with limited budgets
ShipThatApp
- • SaaS applications needing rapid development
- • Projects requiring custom features
- • Teams with limited budgets
When to Choose NativeFast vs ShipThatApp
Choose NativeFast if:
- You're looking for the most cost-effective solution
- You want to start with NativeFast's specific tech stack and approach
- Your project aligns with NativeFast's feature set
Choose ShipThatApp if:
- You prefer ShipThatApp's specific approach and features
- Your requirements match ShipThatApp's capabilities
Final Verdict: NativeFast vs ShipThatApp
Both NativeFast and ShipThatApp are excellent choices for building SaaS applications. Your decision should be based on your specific requirements, budget, and technical preferences.
NativeFast is ideal if you're looking for a more affordable option with specific capabilities.
ShipThatApp stands out for its comprehensive feature set and is perfect for developers who need specific features.
Ultimately, both boilerplates will help you launch your SaaS product faster and more efficiently. Review the detailed comparison above, consider your project requirements, and choose the one that aligns best with your goals.
Frequently Asked Questions: NativeFast vs ShipThatApp
Which is better: NativeFast or ShipThatApp?
The "better" choice depends on your specific needs. NativeFast excels in affordability, while ShipThatAppstands out for its feature set. Consider your budget, required features, and development timeline when making your decision.
What's the price difference between NativeFast and ShipThatApp?
NativeFast costs $99 while ShipThatApp is priced at $197. That's a difference of $98. Both are one-time payments with no recurring fees, making them cost-effective long-term investments for your SaaS project.
Can I switch from NativeFast to ShipThatApp later?
While technically possible, switching boilerplates mid-project is challenging and time-consuming. Each boilerplate has its own architecture, dependencies, and patterns. It's best to carefully evaluate both options now and choose the one that best fits your long-term needs to avoid costly migrations later.
Do NativeFast and ShipThatApp offer similar features?
Both boilerplates offer core SaaS features, but with different implementations and additional capabilities. Check the detailed feature comparison table above to see exactly which features each boilerplate includes. Key differences include payment integrations, authentication systems, and admin panel availability.
Which boilerplate is better for beginners?
For beginners, consider factors like documentation quality, community support, and code complexity. Both NativeFast and ShipThatApp are designed to be developer-friendly, but your choice should depend on your familiarity with their respective tech stacks and the learning resources available.
Are there any hidden costs with NativeFast or ShipThatApp?
Both boilerplates are one-time purchases with no recurring licensing fees. However, you may incur costs for third-party services they integrate with (like payment processors, email services, or hosting platforms). These operational costs are separate from the boilerplate purchase and apply to any SaaS application.
How long does it take to launch with NativeFast vs ShipThatApp?
Both boilerplates significantly reduce development time compared to building from scratch. Depending on your customization needs, you could launch a basic SaaS product in days or weeks rather than months. The exact timeline depends on your specific requirements, team size, and development experience.
Explore More Comparisons
Browse all boilerplates and find the perfect starter kit for your SaaS project.