NativeFast vs Rocket Launch

When choosing between NativeFast and Rocket Launch, it's essential to understand the key differences that make each boilerplate unique. Both are excellent choices for building SaaS applications, but they cater to different needs and development approaches.

What is NativeFast?

NativeFast is a Next.js boilerplate that bundles backend and frontend essentials into one codebase, offering a clean project structure, ready‑to‑use authentication, database configuration, and payment/integration support so you skip the repetitive setup when building web apps. With NativeFast you get a standard folder layout (/app, /api, /components, /models etc.), environment‑config file templates, and integration points for authentication (e.g. OAuth/social login), data storage, and payment providers (Stripe or similar), which lets you launch a scalable full‑stack application with minimal initial wiring. The structure and configuration make it convenient for developers who value speed, maintainability, and convention. Keeping frontend UI, backend API, data models and environment settings in one coherent setup. By relying on this boilerplate, you save time on boilerplate tasks and can focus on product‑specific features instead of reinventing core infrastructure.

Developed by Alessio Gherasim, NativeFast has become a popular choice among developers looking for a reliable starting point for their SaaS projects.

What is Rocket Launch?

Rocketlaunch is a paid SaaS boilerplate built on Next.js + TypeScript + modern web tools. It aims to help developers launch a full SaaS‑style application quickly by providing a pre‑wired foundation covering many of the repetitive parts most apps share. With Rocketlaunch you receive user authentication (via Clerk including email/password, social login, magic‑link, and full user management), subscription and payment support (via Stripe both one‑time and recurring), a backend + database setup (with Prisma + Supabase), and a ready‑to‑use frontend & UI system built with Tailwind CSS and modern UI components. You also get a landing‑page template (for marketing or public presence), account management pages, protected API routes, and a structure that handles many typical SaaS flows authentication, paid subscriptions, user data, and database interactions. The license allows using the boilerplate code for unlimited projects once purchased. Choosing Rocketlaunch means working within its tech stack and architectural decisions: Next.js, Clerk for auth, Supabase/Prisma for database, Stripe for billing, and the provided UI/layout/components system. That makes initial setup faster and removes repetitive boilerplate but also ties you to those tools and decisions, which may limit flexibility if you later want to swap major components. The codebase is more opinionated and potentially heavier than a minimal starter template great for full‑featured SaaS apps, but possibly overkill for simpler projects, prototypes or highly customized apps.

Created by Samuel Benhamou, Rocket Launch offers a robust foundation for building scalable SaaS applications.

When building a SaaS application, choosing the right payment integration is crucial for monetization success. Let's compare the payment options available in NativeFast and Rocket Launch.

Both NativeFast and Rocket Launch are excellent choices for building SaaS applications. Your decision should be based on your specific requirements, budget, and technical preferences.

NativeFast is ideal if you're looking for a feature-rich solution with specific capabilities.

Rocket Launch stands out for its competitive pricing and is perfect for developers who need authentication.

Ultimately, both boilerplates will help you launch your SaaS product faster and more efficiently. Review the detailed comparison above, consider your project requirements, and choose the one that aligns best with your goals.