Detailed Comparison 2025
Makerkit vs Supanuxt
Compare Makerkit and Supanuxt side-by-side. We've analyzed features, pricing, and capabilities to help you choose the best boilerplate for your SaaS project.
Quick Overview
Makerkit
MakerKit is a SaaS‑starter boilerplate built for modern React/Next.js (also supporting Remix/Supabase or Firebase variants) that tries to give you a production‑ready foundation, rather than a barebones template. At its core MakerKit bundles authentication (email, social login, magic‑link, optional MFA), user and team/organization management (multi‑tenancy, roles, invitations), and subscription/billing support via payment providers (Stripe or Lemon Squeezy). The boilerplate comes styled by default using a modern UI stack with Tailwind CSS (and Shadcn/Radix‑based UI components), with light/dark mode and includes UI scaffolding for dashboards, admin panels, marketing pages, blog/documentation pages, and a customizable layout structure. MakerKit aims to reduce the time and effort needed to ship a SaaS: instead of wiring up auth, payments, data layer, UI and common SaaS flows from scratch, you get a working skeleton that you can extend, customize, and build on. This includes also support for serverless or traditional hosting setups, built‑in support for sending stylized transactional emails, and optional plugins/features (like documentation/blog generation, admin dashboards, analytics hooks, and more) to help bootstrap both the product and its public-facing/marketing side.
Key Features
Supanuxt
This SAAS boilerplate is designed to streamline development using modern technologies like Nuxt3, Supabase, and Prisma. It emphasizes separation of concerns and avoiding vendor lock-in, opting for Prisma over Supabase API for database management, and TRPC over REST for efficient client-server communication. The template integrates Stripe for payment processing and supports OAuth via Supabase for authentication. Tailored for flexibility, it uses the Composition API across components and stores, ensuring a consistent approach. Deployment is simplified through Netlify, with detailed guidance on environment setup. This boilerplate serves as a robust starting point for building scalable SAAS applications.
Key Features
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | Makerkit$349 | SupanuxtFree |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $349 | Free |
| Developer | Giancarlo Buomprisco | Michael Dausmann |
| Authentication | ||
| Stripe Integration | ||
| Paddle Integration | ||
| Lemon Squeezy | ||
| Dodo Payments | ||
| Polar | ||
| Creem | ||
| Admin Panel | ||
| User Dashboard | ||
| Subscriptions | ||
| Blog | ||
| SEO Optimized | ||
| Documentation | ||
| Support | ||
| Tailwind CSS | ||
| API | ||
| Two-Factor Auth | ||
| Multi-Tenancy | ||
| Teams | ||
| Shadcn UI | ||
| View Details | View Page | View Page |
Makerkit vs Supanuxt: Detailed Analysis
When choosing between Makerkit and Supanuxt, it's essential to understand the key differences that make each boilerplate unique. Both are excellent choices for building SaaS applications, but they cater to different needs and development approaches.
What is Makerkit?
MakerKit is a SaaS‑starter boilerplate built for modern React/Next.js (also supporting Remix/Supabase or Firebase variants) that tries to give you a production‑ready foundation, rather than a barebones template. At its core MakerKit bundles authentication (email, social login, magic‑link, optional MFA), user and team/organization management (multi‑tenancy, roles, invitations), and subscription/billing support via payment providers (Stripe or Lemon Squeezy). The boilerplate comes styled by default using a modern UI stack with Tailwind CSS (and Shadcn/Radix‑based UI components), with light/dark mode and includes UI scaffolding for dashboards, admin panels, marketing pages, blog/documentation pages, and a customizable layout structure. MakerKit aims to reduce the time and effort needed to ship a SaaS: instead of wiring up auth, payments, data layer, UI and common SaaS flows from scratch, you get a working skeleton that you can extend, customize, and build on. This includes also support for serverless or traditional hosting setups, built‑in support for sending stylized transactional emails, and optional plugins/features (like documentation/blog generation, admin dashboards, analytics hooks, and more) to help bootstrap both the product and its public-facing/marketing side.
Developed by Giancarlo Buomprisco, Makerkit has become a popular choice among developers looking for a reliable starting point for their SaaS projects.
What is Supanuxt?
This SAAS boilerplate is designed to streamline development using modern technologies like Nuxt3, Supabase, and Prisma. It emphasizes separation of concerns and avoiding vendor lock-in, opting for Prisma over Supabase API for database management, and TRPC over REST for efficient client-server communication. The template integrates Stripe for payment processing and supports OAuth via Supabase for authentication. Tailored for flexibility, it uses the Composition API across components and stores, ensuring a consistent approach. Deployment is simplified through Netlify, with detailed guidance on environment setup. This boilerplate serves as a robust starting point for building scalable SAAS applications.
Created by Michael Dausmann, Supanuxt offers a robust foundation for building scalable SaaS applications.
Need to Promote Your Startup or Boilerplate?
Check out LaunchDirectories.com to get your startup or boilerplate listed in 100+ product launch directories and gain valuable backlinks from high-authority platforms. This is especially effective for new products looking to quickly build domain authority and gain backlinks.
Payment Integration: Makerkit vs Supanuxt
Key Differences Between Makerkit and Supanuxt
💰 Pricing
Makerkit is priced at $349, while Supanuxt costs Free. This makes Makerkit the more budget-friendly option, potentially saving you 999650 dollars.
⚡ Features & Capabilities
Both boilerplates include authentication systems, making it easy to implement user login and registration.
Payment processing is available in both options. Makerkit supports Stripe, while Supanuxt integrates with Stripe.
Makerkit includes an admin panel, giving you more control out of the box.
🎯 Best Use Cases
Makerkit
- • SaaS startups looking for quick deployment
- • Projects requiring authentication
- • Teams with flexible budgets
- • Multi-tenant applications
Supanuxt
- • SaaS applications needing rapid development
- • Projects requiring authentication
- • Teams with flexible budgets
When to Choose Makerkit vs Supanuxt
Choose Makerkit if:
- You're looking for the most cost-effective solution
- You require an admin panel for managing your application
- You're building a multi-tenant SaaS application
- You want to start with Makerkit's specific tech stack and approach
- Your project aligns with Makerkit's feature set
Choose Supanuxt if:
- You prefer Supanuxt's specific approach and features
- Your requirements match Supanuxt's capabilities
Final Verdict: Makerkit vs Supanuxt
Both Makerkit and Supanuxt are excellent choices for building SaaS applications. Your decision should be based on your specific requirements, budget, and technical preferences.
Makerkit is ideal if you're looking for a more affordable option with built-in authentication.
Supanuxt stands out for its comprehensive feature set and is perfect for developers who need authentication.
Ultimately, both boilerplates will help you launch your SaaS product faster and more efficiently. Review the detailed comparison above, consider your project requirements, and choose the one that aligns best with your goals.
Frequently Asked Questions: Makerkit vs Supanuxt
Which is better: Makerkit or Supanuxt?
The "better" choice depends on your specific needs. Makerkit excels in affordability, while Supanuxtstands out for its feature set. Consider your budget, required features, and development timeline when making your decision.
What's the price difference between Makerkit and Supanuxt?
Makerkit costs $349 while Supanuxt is priced at Free. That's a difference of $999650. Both are one-time payments with no recurring fees, making them cost-effective long-term investments for your SaaS project.
Can I switch from Makerkit to Supanuxt later?
While technically possible, switching boilerplates mid-project is challenging and time-consuming. Each boilerplate has its own architecture, dependencies, and patterns. It's best to carefully evaluate both options now and choose the one that best fits your long-term needs to avoid costly migrations later.
Do Makerkit and Supanuxt offer similar features?
Both boilerplates offer core SaaS features, but with different implementations and additional capabilities. Check the detailed feature comparison table above to see exactly which features each boilerplate includes. Key differences include payment integrations, authentication systems, and admin panel availability.
Which boilerplate is better for beginners?
For beginners, consider factors like documentation quality, community support, and code complexity. Both Makerkit and Supanuxt are designed to be developer-friendly, but your choice should depend on your familiarity with their respective tech stacks and the learning resources available.
Are there any hidden costs with Makerkit or Supanuxt?
Both boilerplates are one-time purchases with no recurring licensing fees. However, you may incur costs for third-party services they integrate with (like payment processors, email services, or hosting platforms). These operational costs are separate from the boilerplate purchase and apply to any SaaS application.
How long does it take to launch with Makerkit vs Supanuxt?
Both boilerplates significantly reduce development time compared to building from scratch. Depending on your customization needs, you could launch a basic SaaS product in days or weeks rather than months. The exact timeline depends on your specific requirements, team size, and development experience.
Explore More Comparisons
Browse all boilerplates and find the perfect starter kit for your SaaS project.