Detailed Comparison 2025
Makerkit vs Rocket Launch
Compare Makerkit and Rocket Launch side-by-side. We've analyzed features, pricing, and capabilities to help you choose the best boilerplate for your SaaS project.
Quick Overview
Makerkit
MakerKit is a SaaS‑starter boilerplate built for modern React/Next.js (also supporting Remix/Supabase or Firebase variants) that tries to give you a production‑ready foundation, rather than a barebones template. At its core MakerKit bundles authentication (email, social login, magic‑link, optional MFA), user and team/organization management (multi‑tenancy, roles, invitations), and subscription/billing support via payment providers (Stripe or Lemon Squeezy). The boilerplate comes styled by default using a modern UI stack with Tailwind CSS (and Shadcn/Radix‑based UI components), with light/dark mode and includes UI scaffolding for dashboards, admin panels, marketing pages, blog/documentation pages, and a customizable layout structure. MakerKit aims to reduce the time and effort needed to ship a SaaS: instead of wiring up auth, payments, data layer, UI and common SaaS flows from scratch, you get a working skeleton that you can extend, customize, and build on. This includes also support for serverless or traditional hosting setups, built‑in support for sending stylized transactional emails, and optional plugins/features (like documentation/blog generation, admin dashboards, analytics hooks, and more) to help bootstrap both the product and its public-facing/marketing side.
Key Features
Rocket Launch
Rocketlaunch is a paid SaaS boilerplate built on Next.js + TypeScript + modern web tools. It aims to help developers launch a full SaaS‑style application quickly by providing a pre‑wired foundation covering many of the repetitive parts most apps share. With Rocketlaunch you receive user authentication (via Clerk including email/password, social login, magic‑link, and full user management), subscription and payment support (via Stripe both one‑time and recurring), a backend + database setup (with Prisma + Supabase), and a ready‑to‑use frontend & UI system built with Tailwind CSS and modern UI components. You also get a landing‑page template (for marketing or public presence), account management pages, protected API routes, and a structure that handles many typical SaaS flows authentication, paid subscriptions, user data, and database interactions. The license allows using the boilerplate code for unlimited projects once purchased. Choosing Rocketlaunch means working within its tech stack and architectural decisions: Next.js, Clerk for auth, Supabase/Prisma for database, Stripe for billing, and the provided UI/layout/components system. That makes initial setup faster and removes repetitive boilerplate but also ties you to those tools and decisions, which may limit flexibility if you later want to swap major components. The codebase is more opinionated and potentially heavier than a minimal starter template great for full‑featured SaaS apps, but possibly overkill for simpler projects, prototypes or highly customized apps.
Key Features
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | Makerkit$349 | Rocket Launch$49 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $349 | $49 |
| Developer | Giancarlo Buomprisco | Samuel Benhamou |
| Authentication | ||
| Stripe Integration | ||
| Paddle Integration | ||
| Lemon Squeezy | ||
| Dodo Payments | ||
| Polar | ||
| Creem | ||
| Admin Panel | ||
| User Dashboard | ||
| Subscriptions | ||
| Blog | ||
| SEO Optimized | ||
| Documentation | ||
| Support | ||
| Tailwind CSS | ||
| API | ||
| Two-Factor Auth | ||
| Multi-Tenancy | ||
| Teams | ||
| Shadcn UI | ||
| View Details | View Page | View Page |
Makerkit vs Rocket Launch: Detailed Analysis
When choosing between Makerkit and Rocket Launch, it's essential to understand the key differences that make each boilerplate unique. Both are excellent choices for building SaaS applications, but they cater to different needs and development approaches.
What is Makerkit?
MakerKit is a SaaS‑starter boilerplate built for modern React/Next.js (also supporting Remix/Supabase or Firebase variants) that tries to give you a production‑ready foundation, rather than a barebones template. At its core MakerKit bundles authentication (email, social login, magic‑link, optional MFA), user and team/organization management (multi‑tenancy, roles, invitations), and subscription/billing support via payment providers (Stripe or Lemon Squeezy). The boilerplate comes styled by default using a modern UI stack with Tailwind CSS (and Shadcn/Radix‑based UI components), with light/dark mode and includes UI scaffolding for dashboards, admin panels, marketing pages, blog/documentation pages, and a customizable layout structure. MakerKit aims to reduce the time and effort needed to ship a SaaS: instead of wiring up auth, payments, data layer, UI and common SaaS flows from scratch, you get a working skeleton that you can extend, customize, and build on. This includes also support for serverless or traditional hosting setups, built‑in support for sending stylized transactional emails, and optional plugins/features (like documentation/blog generation, admin dashboards, analytics hooks, and more) to help bootstrap both the product and its public-facing/marketing side.
Developed by Giancarlo Buomprisco, Makerkit has become a popular choice among developers looking for a reliable starting point for their SaaS projects.
What is Rocket Launch?
Rocketlaunch is a paid SaaS boilerplate built on Next.js + TypeScript + modern web tools. It aims to help developers launch a full SaaS‑style application quickly by providing a pre‑wired foundation covering many of the repetitive parts most apps share. With Rocketlaunch you receive user authentication (via Clerk including email/password, social login, magic‑link, and full user management), subscription and payment support (via Stripe both one‑time and recurring), a backend + database setup (with Prisma + Supabase), and a ready‑to‑use frontend & UI system built with Tailwind CSS and modern UI components. You also get a landing‑page template (for marketing or public presence), account management pages, protected API routes, and a structure that handles many typical SaaS flows authentication, paid subscriptions, user data, and database interactions. The license allows using the boilerplate code for unlimited projects once purchased. Choosing Rocketlaunch means working within its tech stack and architectural decisions: Next.js, Clerk for auth, Supabase/Prisma for database, Stripe for billing, and the provided UI/layout/components system. That makes initial setup faster and removes repetitive boilerplate but also ties you to those tools and decisions, which may limit flexibility if you later want to swap major components. The codebase is more opinionated and potentially heavier than a minimal starter template great for full‑featured SaaS apps, but possibly overkill for simpler projects, prototypes or highly customized apps.
Created by Samuel Benhamou, Rocket Launch offers a robust foundation for building scalable SaaS applications.
Need to Promote Your Startup or Boilerplate?
Check out LaunchDirectories.com to get your startup or boilerplate listed in 100+ product launch directories and gain valuable backlinks from high-authority platforms. This is especially effective for new products looking to quickly build domain authority and gain backlinks.
Payment Integration: Makerkit vs Rocket Launch
Key Differences Between Makerkit and Rocket Launch
💰 Pricing
Makerkit is priced at $349, while Rocket Launch costs $49. Rocket Launch offers better value at a lower price point, saving you 300 dollars.
⚡ Features & Capabilities
Both boilerplates include authentication systems, making it easy to implement user login and registration.
Payment processing is available in both options. Makerkit supports Stripe, while Rocket Launch integrates with Stripe.
Both include admin panels for managing your application.
🎯 Best Use Cases
Makerkit
- • SaaS startups looking for quick deployment
- • Projects requiring authentication
- • Teams with flexible budgets
- • Multi-tenant applications
Rocket Launch
- • SaaS applications needing rapid development
- • Projects requiring authentication
- • Teams with limited budgets
When to Choose Makerkit vs Rocket Launch
Choose Makerkit if:
- You're building a multi-tenant SaaS application
- You want to start with Makerkit's specific tech stack and approach
- Your project aligns with Makerkit's feature set
Choose Rocket Launch if:
- You're looking for the most cost-effective solution
- You prefer Rocket Launch's specific approach and features
- Your requirements match Rocket Launch's capabilities
Final Verdict: Makerkit vs Rocket Launch
Both Makerkit and Rocket Launch are excellent choices for building SaaS applications. Your decision should be based on your specific requirements, budget, and technical preferences.
Makerkit is ideal if you're looking for a feature-rich solution with built-in authentication.
Rocket Launch stands out for its competitive pricing and is perfect for developers who need authentication.
Ultimately, both boilerplates will help you launch your SaaS product faster and more efficiently. Review the detailed comparison above, consider your project requirements, and choose the one that aligns best with your goals.
Frequently Asked Questions: Makerkit vs Rocket Launch
Which is better: Makerkit or Rocket Launch?
The "better" choice depends on your specific needs. Makerkit excels in comprehensive features, while Rocket Launchstands out for value pricing. Consider your budget, required features, and development timeline when making your decision.
What's the price difference between Makerkit and Rocket Launch?
Makerkit costs $349 while Rocket Launch is priced at $49. That's a difference of $300. Both are one-time payments with no recurring fees, making them cost-effective long-term investments for your SaaS project.
Can I switch from Makerkit to Rocket Launch later?
While technically possible, switching boilerplates mid-project is challenging and time-consuming. Each boilerplate has its own architecture, dependencies, and patterns. It's best to carefully evaluate both options now and choose the one that best fits your long-term needs to avoid costly migrations later.
Do Makerkit and Rocket Launch offer similar features?
Both boilerplates offer core SaaS features, but with different implementations and additional capabilities. Check the detailed feature comparison table above to see exactly which features each boilerplate includes. Key differences include payment integrations, authentication systems, and admin panel availability.
Which boilerplate is better for beginners?
For beginners, consider factors like documentation quality, community support, and code complexity. Both Makerkit and Rocket Launch are designed to be developer-friendly, but your choice should depend on your familiarity with their respective tech stacks and the learning resources available.
Are there any hidden costs with Makerkit or Rocket Launch?
Both boilerplates are one-time purchases with no recurring licensing fees. However, you may incur costs for third-party services they integrate with (like payment processors, email services, or hosting platforms). These operational costs are separate from the boilerplate purchase and apply to any SaaS application.
How long does it take to launch with Makerkit vs Rocket Launch?
Both boilerplates significantly reduce development time compared to building from scratch. Depending on your customization needs, you could launch a basic SaaS product in days or weeks rather than months. The exact timeline depends on your specific requirements, team size, and development experience.
Explore More Comparisons
Browse all boilerplates and find the perfect starter kit for your SaaS project.