Makerkit vs NextJet

When choosing between Makerkit and NextJet, it's essential to understand the key differences that make each boilerplate unique. Both are excellent choices for building SaaS applications, but they cater to different needs and development approaches.

What is Makerkit?

MakerKit is a SaaS‑starter boilerplate built for modern React/Next.js (also supporting Remix/Supabase or Firebase variants) that tries to give you a production‑ready foundation, rather than a barebones template. At its core MakerKit bundles authentication (email, social login, magic‑link, optional MFA), user and team/organization management (multi‑tenancy, roles, invitations), and subscription/billing support via payment providers (Stripe or Lemon Squeezy). The boilerplate comes styled by default using a modern UI stack with Tailwind CSS (and Shadcn/Radix‑based UI components), with light/dark mode and includes UI scaffolding for dashboards, admin panels, marketing pages, blog/documentation pages, and a customizable layout structure. MakerKit aims to reduce the time and effort needed to ship a SaaS: instead of wiring up auth, payments, data layer, UI and common SaaS flows from scratch, you get a working skeleton that you can extend, customize, and build on. This includes also support for serverless or traditional hosting setups, built‑in support for sending stylized transactional emails, and optional plugins/features (like documentation/blog generation, admin dashboards, analytics hooks, and more) to help bootstrap both the product and its public-facing/marketing side.

Developed by Giancarlo Buomprisco, Makerkit has become a popular choice among developers looking for a reliable starting point for their SaaS projects.

What is NextJet?

NextJet is a full‑stack SaaS boilerplate built with Next.js, TypeScript and modern web‑app tooling, made to give developers a solid, production‑ready foundation when building subscription‑based or SaaS‑style applications. Out of the box it handles core infrastructure: user authentication + authorization (including OAuth and magic‑link support), payment/subscription logic via Stripe or Lemon Squeezy, and pre‑built user dashboards + admin panel. It also includes content‑management and marketing‑side features: a blog and documentation system using MDX, a customizable landing/marketing site, email templates, and onboarding flows. The project follows a modular, maintainable architecture (monorepo via Turborepo, clean folder structure, typesafety via TypeScript), which helps keep code organized, useful if you plan to grow or scale the app over time. Because much of the “plumbing” is already configured, you can skip repetitive setup and get to building your product‑specific logic faster. At the same time, using NextJet means trusting its built‑in architecture, tech stack and conventions. If your project needs a very different stack, unusual backend/data requirements or a minimal footprint, you might need to refactor or drop parts of what comes with the boilerplate.

Created by Renas Hassan, NextJet offers a robust foundation for building scalable SaaS applications.

When building a SaaS application, choosing the right payment integration is crucial for monetization success. Let's compare the payment options available in Makerkit and NextJet.

Both Makerkit and NextJet are excellent choices for building SaaS applications. Your decision should be based on your specific requirements, budget, and technical preferences.

Makerkit is ideal if you're looking for a feature-rich solution with built-in authentication.

NextJet stands out for its competitive pricing and is perfect for developers who need authentication.

Ultimately, both boilerplates will help you launch your SaaS product faster and more efficiently. Review the detailed comparison above, consider your project requirements, and choose the one that aligns best with your goals.