LaunchFast vs NextJet

When choosing between LaunchFast and NextJet, it's essential to understand the key differences that make each boilerplate unique. Both are excellent choices for building SaaS applications, but they cater to different needs and development approaches.

What is LaunchFast?

LaunchFast is a boilerplate designed to give developers a solid starting point for building modern web applications. It comes with pre-configured templates for frameworks like Next.js, Astro, and SvelteKit, providing authentication, database connections, payment integration, email support, analytics, and content management all set up and ready to go. The goal is to remove repetitive setup work so developers can focus on building the unique parts of their app. LaunchFast also includes SEO-friendly routing, page templates, and a basic UI scaffold, making it easier to launch functional web apps or SaaS projects quickly. While it speeds up initial development, adopting LaunchFast means following its chosen stack and architecture, so projects that require a highly customized setup may need adjustments or modifications to the default structure.

Developed by Rishi Raj Jain, LaunchFast has become a popular choice among developers looking for a reliable starting point for their SaaS projects.

What is NextJet?

NextJet is a full‑stack SaaS boilerplate built with Next.js, TypeScript and modern web‑app tooling, made to give developers a solid, production‑ready foundation when building subscription‑based or SaaS‑style applications. Out of the box it handles core infrastructure: user authentication + authorization (including OAuth and magic‑link support), payment/subscription logic via Stripe or Lemon Squeezy, and pre‑built user dashboards + admin panel. It also includes content‑management and marketing‑side features: a blog and documentation system using MDX, a customizable landing/marketing site, email templates, and onboarding flows. The project follows a modular, maintainable architecture (monorepo via Turborepo, clean folder structure, typesafety via TypeScript), which helps keep code organized, useful if you plan to grow or scale the app over time. Because much of the “plumbing” is already configured, you can skip repetitive setup and get to building your product‑specific logic faster. At the same time, using NextJet means trusting its built‑in architecture, tech stack and conventions. If your project needs a very different stack, unusual backend/data requirements or a minimal footprint, you might need to refactor or drop parts of what comes with the boilerplate.

Created by Renas Hassan, NextJet offers a robust foundation for building scalable SaaS applications.

When building a SaaS application, choosing the right payment integration is crucial for monetization success. Let's compare the payment options available in LaunchFast and NextJet.

Both LaunchFast and NextJet are excellent choices for building SaaS applications. Your decision should be based on your specific requirements, budget, and technical preferences.

LaunchFast is ideal if you're looking for a feature-rich solution with built-in authentication.

NextJet stands out for its competitive pricing and is perfect for developers who need authentication.

Ultimately, both boilerplates will help you launch your SaaS product faster and more efficiently. Review the detailed comparison above, consider your project requirements, and choose the one that aligns best with your goals.