Horizon Boilerplate vs Makerkit

When choosing between Horizon Boilerplate and Makerkit, it's essential to understand the key differences that make each boilerplate unique. Both are excellent choices for building SaaS applications, but they cater to different needs and development approaches.

What is Horizon Boilerplate?

Horizon UI Boilerplate is a full‑stack / UI‑kit + boilerplate template for web applications built on modern front‑end and backend technologies. It is designed to help developers jump‑start a project (dashboard, SaaS app, admin panel, landing pages, etc.) without building all the plumbing and UI from scratch. Under the hood, it uses Next.js (recent version), along with React, and it supports styling with Tailwind CSS. It also integrates with Supabase for database/auth (or backend services) and Stripe for payment/billing handling providing a foundation for SaaS‑style apps with user authentication, subscriptions, payments, and user sessions. It supplies a large library of ready-made frontend building blocks: dashboards, admin layouts, landing pages, authentication screens, UI components (buttons, cards, navbars, form elements, etc.), and example page templates. This offers a starting point with both structural and visual parts already assembled. The boilerplate is offered in multiple variants: including a version built with Chakra UI or integration with shadcn/ui / Shadcn‑styled components or Tailwind, depending on your preference.

Developed by Vlad Mihalache, Horizon Boilerplate has become a popular choice among developers looking for a reliable starting point for their SaaS projects.

What is Makerkit?

MakerKit is a SaaS‑starter boilerplate built for modern React/Next.js (also supporting Remix/Supabase or Firebase variants) that tries to give you a production‑ready foundation, rather than a barebones template. At its core MakerKit bundles authentication (email, social login, magic‑link, optional MFA), user and team/organization management (multi‑tenancy, roles, invitations), and subscription/billing support via payment providers (Stripe or Lemon Squeezy). The boilerplate comes styled by default using a modern UI stack with Tailwind CSS (and Shadcn/Radix‑based UI components), with light/dark mode and includes UI scaffolding for dashboards, admin panels, marketing pages, blog/documentation pages, and a customizable layout structure. MakerKit aims to reduce the time and effort needed to ship a SaaS: instead of wiring up auth, payments, data layer, UI and common SaaS flows from scratch, you get a working skeleton that you can extend, customize, and build on. This includes also support for serverless or traditional hosting setups, built‑in support for sending stylized transactional emails, and optional plugins/features (like documentation/blog generation, admin dashboards, analytics hooks, and more) to help bootstrap both the product and its public-facing/marketing side.

Created by Giancarlo Buomprisco, Makerkit offers a robust foundation for building scalable SaaS applications.

When building a SaaS application, choosing the right payment integration is crucial for monetization success. Let's compare the payment options available in Horizon Boilerplate and Makerkit.

Both Horizon Boilerplate and Makerkit are excellent choices for building SaaS applications. Your decision should be based on your specific requirements, budget, and technical preferences.

Horizon Boilerplate is ideal if you're looking for a more affordable option with built-in authentication.

Makerkit stands out for its comprehensive feature set and is perfect for developers who need authentication.

Ultimately, both boilerplates will help you launch your SaaS product faster and more efficiently. Review the detailed comparison above, consider your project requirements, and choose the one that aligns best with your goals.