Detailed Comparison 2025
Gravity vs Supaboost
Compare Gravity and Supaboost side-by-side. We've analyzed features, pricing, and capabilities to help you choose the best boilerplate for your SaaS project.
Quick Overview
Gravity
Gravity is a full‑stack boilerplate for JavaScript/TypeScript projects combining a Node.js backend with a React (or React Native) frontend designed to give developers a head‑start when building SaaS applications. It aims to deliver a working foundation so that you don’t need to assemble all the plumbing (auth, billing, database, UI, API) from scratch. The boilerplate includes support for multiple databases (like Postgres, MySQL, MongoDB, MariaDB and possibly others) which gives flexibility depending on your data/storage preferences. There is also a full “stack” support: server (Node.js + Express/API backend), web client (React + Tailwind or similar), and optionally native mobile clients (via React Native), which helps if you want a unified codebase for web + mobile. Beyond the core stack, Gravity claims to bundle SaaS‑ready features: authentication (email/password, magic links, social logins, 2FA, account security), subscription & billing support (with free plans, trials, seat‑based or usage billing), and a library of UI components & views (dashboard, admin tools, layout components, responsive UI, dark mode, etc.). Gravity also offers a “website/landing page template” (built with a static‑site generator + modern site tooling) useful for marketing, landing pages, pricing pages, etc. — thereby giving you both the “app core” and “public‑facing site” foundation.
Key Features
Supaboost
Supaboost is a full‑stack SaaS starter kit built on Next.js (version 14) and Supabase designed to accelerate building web apps, marketplaces or SaaS products by providing a ready‑to‑use foundation. Out of the box, Supaboost includes: secure user authentication and role‑based user/organization management, a working PostgreSQL‑based database schema (with row‑level security), subscription and payment integration via LemonSqueezy for subscriptions and transactions, and a clean, maintainable codebase using TypeScript + modern UI built with Shadcn UI. On top of backend & auth/payment plumbing it provides basic UI scaffolding, data‑visualization tools (using e.g. Recharts), form management support (via TanStack Forms) and integrations helpful for building SaaS‑style features quickly. On the trade‑off side: adopting Supaboost means committing to its stac: Next.js + Supabase + LemonSqueezy + the provided UI/layout + conventions. If your project requires a radically different backend, non‑SQL database, or custom payment flow, you may need to rework significant parts. Also, while it offers many integrations, relying heavily on the boilerplate may mean inheriting its assumptions (schema, auth structure, payment model), which might not fit all projects. Finally like any “all-in-one” starter, the feature richness may be overkill for very simple apps or prototypes.
Key Features
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | Gravity$696 | Supaboost$150 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $696 | $150 |
| Developer | Kyle Gawley | Lee |
| Authentication | ||
| Stripe Integration | ||
| Paddle Integration | ||
| Lemon Squeezy | ||
| Dodo Payments | ||
| Polar | ||
| Creem | ||
| Admin Panel | ||
| User Dashboard | ||
| Subscriptions | ||
| Blog | ||
| SEO Optimized | ||
| Documentation | ||
| Support | ||
| Tailwind CSS | ||
| API | ||
| Two-Factor Auth | ||
| Multi-Tenancy | ||
| Teams | ||
| Shadcn UI | ||
| View Details | View Page | View Page |
Gravity vs Supaboost: Detailed Analysis
When choosing between Gravity and Supaboost, it's essential to understand the key differences that make each boilerplate unique. Both are excellent choices for building SaaS applications, but they cater to different needs and development approaches.
What is Gravity?
Gravity is a full‑stack boilerplate for JavaScript/TypeScript projects combining a Node.js backend with a React (or React Native) frontend designed to give developers a head‑start when building SaaS applications. It aims to deliver a working foundation so that you don’t need to assemble all the plumbing (auth, billing, database, UI, API) from scratch. The boilerplate includes support for multiple databases (like Postgres, MySQL, MongoDB, MariaDB and possibly others) which gives flexibility depending on your data/storage preferences. There is also a full “stack” support: server (Node.js + Express/API backend), web client (React + Tailwind or similar), and optionally native mobile clients (via React Native), which helps if you want a unified codebase for web + mobile. Beyond the core stack, Gravity claims to bundle SaaS‑ready features: authentication (email/password, magic links, social logins, 2FA, account security), subscription & billing support (with free plans, trials, seat‑based or usage billing), and a library of UI components & views (dashboard, admin tools, layout components, responsive UI, dark mode, etc.). Gravity also offers a “website/landing page template” (built with a static‑site generator + modern site tooling) useful for marketing, landing pages, pricing pages, etc. — thereby giving you both the “app core” and “public‑facing site” foundation.
Developed by Kyle Gawley, Gravity has become a popular choice among developers looking for a reliable starting point for their SaaS projects.
What is Supaboost?
Supaboost is a full‑stack SaaS starter kit built on Next.js (version 14) and Supabase designed to accelerate building web apps, marketplaces or SaaS products by providing a ready‑to‑use foundation. Out of the box, Supaboost includes: secure user authentication and role‑based user/organization management, a working PostgreSQL‑based database schema (with row‑level security), subscription and payment integration via LemonSqueezy for subscriptions and transactions, and a clean, maintainable codebase using TypeScript + modern UI built with Shadcn UI. On top of backend & auth/payment plumbing it provides basic UI scaffolding, data‑visualization tools (using e.g. Recharts), form management support (via TanStack Forms) and integrations helpful for building SaaS‑style features quickly. On the trade‑off side: adopting Supaboost means committing to its stac: Next.js + Supabase + LemonSqueezy + the provided UI/layout + conventions. If your project requires a radically different backend, non‑SQL database, or custom payment flow, you may need to rework significant parts. Also, while it offers many integrations, relying heavily on the boilerplate may mean inheriting its assumptions (schema, auth structure, payment model), which might not fit all projects. Finally like any “all-in-one” starter, the feature richness may be overkill for very simple apps or prototypes.
Created by Lee, Supaboost offers a robust foundation for building scalable SaaS applications.
Need to Promote Your Startup or Boilerplate?
Check out LaunchDirectories.com to get your startup or boilerplate listed in 100+ product launch directories and gain valuable backlinks from high-authority platforms. This is especially effective for new products looking to quickly build domain authority and gain backlinks.
Payment Integration: Gravity vs Supaboost
When building a SaaS application, choosing the right payment integration is crucial for monetization success. Let's compare the payment options available in Gravity and Supaboost.
Gravity Payment Options
Gravity supports Stripe.
Supaboost Payment Options
Supaboost integrates with Stripe and Lemon Squeezy. With Merchant of Record support, you can focus on building your product while the payment provider handles tax compliance, invoicing, and regulatory requirements across different countries.
Key Differences Between Gravity and Supaboost
💰 Pricing
Gravity is priced at $696, while Supaboost costs $150. Supaboost offers better value at a lower price point, saving you 546 dollars.
⚡ Features & Capabilities
Both boilerplates include authentication systems, making it easy to implement user login and registration.
Payment processing is available in both options. Gravity supports Stripe, while Supaboost integrates with Stripe, Lemon Squeezy.
Gravity includes an admin panel, giving you more control out of the box.
🎯 Best Use Cases
Gravity
- • SaaS startups looking for quick deployment
- • Projects requiring authentication
- • Teams with flexible budgets
- • Multi-tenant applications
Supaboost
- • SaaS applications needing rapid development
- • Projects requiring authentication
- • Teams with limited budgets
When to Choose Gravity vs Supaboost
Choose Gravity if:
- You require an admin panel for managing your application
- You're building a multi-tenant SaaS application
- You want to start with Gravity's specific tech stack and approach
- Your project aligns with Gravity's feature set
Choose Supaboost if:
- You're looking for the most cost-effective solution
- You prefer Supaboost's specific approach and features
- Your requirements match Supaboost's capabilities
Final Verdict: Gravity vs Supaboost
Both Gravity and Supaboost are excellent choices for building SaaS applications. Your decision should be based on your specific requirements, budget, and technical preferences.
Gravity is ideal if you're looking for a feature-rich solution with built-in authentication.
Supaboost stands out for its competitive pricing and is perfect for developers who need authentication.
Ultimately, both boilerplates will help you launch your SaaS product faster and more efficiently. Review the detailed comparison above, consider your project requirements, and choose the one that aligns best with your goals.
Frequently Asked Questions: Gravity vs Supaboost
Which is better: Gravity or Supaboost?
The "better" choice depends on your specific needs. Gravity excels in comprehensive features, while Supabooststands out for value pricing. Consider your budget, required features, and development timeline when making your decision.
What's the price difference between Gravity and Supaboost?
Gravity costs $696 while Supaboost is priced at $150. That's a difference of $546. Both are one-time payments with no recurring fees, making them cost-effective long-term investments for your SaaS project.
Can I switch from Gravity to Supaboost later?
While technically possible, switching boilerplates mid-project is challenging and time-consuming. Each boilerplate has its own architecture, dependencies, and patterns. It's best to carefully evaluate both options now and choose the one that best fits your long-term needs to avoid costly migrations later.
Do Gravity and Supaboost offer similar features?
Both boilerplates offer core SaaS features, but with different implementations and additional capabilities. Check the detailed feature comparison table above to see exactly which features each boilerplate includes. Key differences include payment integrations, authentication systems, and admin panel availability.
Which boilerplate is better for beginners?
For beginners, consider factors like documentation quality, community support, and code complexity. Both Gravity and Supaboost are designed to be developer-friendly, but your choice should depend on your familiarity with their respective tech stacks and the learning resources available.
Are there any hidden costs with Gravity or Supaboost?
Both boilerplates are one-time purchases with no recurring licensing fees. However, you may incur costs for third-party services they integrate with (like payment processors, email services, or hosting platforms). These operational costs are separate from the boilerplate purchase and apply to any SaaS application.
How long does it take to launch with Gravity vs Supaboost?
Both boilerplates significantly reduce development time compared to building from scratch. Depending on your customization needs, you could launch a basic SaaS product in days or weeks rather than months. The exact timeline depends on your specific requirements, team size, and development experience.
Explore More Comparisons
Browse all boilerplates and find the perfect starter kit for your SaaS project.