Gravity vs SaaSBold

When choosing between Gravity and SaaSBold, it's essential to understand the key differences that make each boilerplate unique. Both are excellent choices for building SaaS applications, but they cater to different needs and development approaches.

What is Gravity?

Gravity is a full‑stack boilerplate for JavaScript/TypeScript projects combining a Node.js backend with a React (or React Native) frontend designed to give developers a head‑start when building SaaS applications. It aims to deliver a working foundation so that you don’t need to assemble all the plumbing (auth, billing, database, UI, API) from scratch. The boilerplate includes support for multiple databases (like Postgres, MySQL, MongoDB, MariaDB and possibly others) which gives flexibility depending on your data/storage preferences. There is also a full “stack” support: server (Node.js + Express/API backend), web client (React + Tailwind or similar), and optionally native mobile clients (via React Native), which helps if you want a unified codebase for web + mobile. Beyond the core stack, Gravity claims to bundle SaaS‑ready features: authentication (email/password, magic links, social logins, 2FA, account security), subscription & billing support (with free plans, trials, seat‑based or usage billing), and a library of UI components & views (dashboard, admin tools, layout components, responsive UI, dark mode, etc.). Gravity also offers a “website/landing page template” (built with a static‑site generator + modern site tooling) useful for marketing, landing pages, pricing pages, etc. — thereby giving you both the “app core” and “public‑facing site” foundation.

Developed by Kyle Gawley, Gravity has become a popular choice among developers looking for a reliable starting point for their SaaS projects.

What is SaaSBold?

SaaSBold is a full‑stack SaaS boilerplate and starter‑kit built with Next.js + TypeScript + Prisma/PostgreSQL (or compatible database), offering both frontend and backend scaffolding to help launch a SaaS or web application rapidly. It aims to provide an end‑to‑end glue: authentication (with social logins, magic links, email/password), payment/subscription and billing logic (via Stripe, with additional billing‑gateway support possible), user & admin dashboards, marketing/landing‑page + blog/ content pages, email/newsletter and transactional‑mail setup, internationalization (i18n), and a UI component/design system built with Tailwind CSS so you don’t need to wire all that from scratch. There are built‑in features for both end‑users and admins: user‑login/registration flows, account/dashboards, subscription management; also admin-side tools to manage users, operations, maybe analytics or CRM‑like features depending on version. SaaSBold advertises one-click deployment (e.g. to Vercel), a Figma source file + style‑guide (helpful for designers or brand consistency), email support & documentation, and lifetime updates when you license it which lowers friction for startups or solo developers who want to get a production‑ready SaaS quickly.

Created by Musharof Chowdhury, SaaSBold offers a robust foundation for building scalable SaaS applications.

When building a SaaS application, choosing the right payment integration is crucial for monetization success. Let's compare the payment options available in Gravity and SaaSBold.

Both Gravity and SaaSBold are excellent choices for building SaaS applications. Your decision should be based on your specific requirements, budget, and technical preferences.

Gravity is ideal if you're looking for a feature-rich solution with built-in authentication.

SaaSBold stands out for its competitive pricing and is perfect for developers who need authentication.

Ultimately, both boilerplates will help you launch your SaaS product faster and more efficiently. Review the detailed comparison above, consider your project requirements, and choose the one that aligns best with your goals.