Gravity vs NextReady

When choosing between Gravity and NextReady, it's essential to understand the key differences that make each boilerplate unique. Both are excellent choices for building SaaS applications, but they cater to different needs and development approaches.

What is Gravity?

Gravity is a full‑stack boilerplate for JavaScript/TypeScript projects combining a Node.js backend with a React (or React Native) frontend designed to give developers a head‑start when building SaaS applications. It aims to deliver a working foundation so that you don’t need to assemble all the plumbing (auth, billing, database, UI, API) from scratch. The boilerplate includes support for multiple databases (like Postgres, MySQL, MongoDB, MariaDB and possibly others) which gives flexibility depending on your data/storage preferences. There is also a full “stack” support: server (Node.js + Express/API backend), web client (React + Tailwind or similar), and optionally native mobile clients (via React Native), which helps if you want a unified codebase for web + mobile. Beyond the core stack, Gravity claims to bundle SaaS‑ready features: authentication (email/password, magic links, social logins, 2FA, account security), subscription & billing support (with free plans, trials, seat‑based or usage billing), and a library of UI components & views (dashboard, admin tools, layout components, responsive UI, dark mode, etc.). Gravity also offers a “website/landing page template” (built with a static‑site generator + modern site tooling) useful for marketing, landing pages, pricing pages, etc. — thereby giving you both the “app core” and “public‑facing site” foundation.

Developed by Kyle Gawley, Gravity has become a popular choice among developers looking for a reliable starting point for their SaaS projects.

What is NextReady?

NextReady is a full‑stack boilerplate built on Next.js + Prisma + shadcn/ui (with TypeScript) a ready‑made starting point for web applications including SaaS, dashboards, or subscription‑based products. It aims to let developers skip routine setup work (authentication, payments, user & role management, payment/invoice flows, content/markdown support, and basic UI scaffolding) and jump straight into building the core features of their app. NextReady comes pre‑wired with magic‑link authentication, role‑based authorization, a built‑in admin panel, user and invoice management, payment integration (using payment providers like Lemon Squeezy or similar), email support, database setup with Prisma models, and basic layouts/components for landing pages, blogs or content pages with SEO‑ready structure. It also supports additional features that many modern apps benefit from markdown‑based content, waiting‑list or onboarding flows, and optional integrations (e.g. AI SDKs, payment gateways beyond simple plans) depending on your needs. Because it bundles many features: auth, payments, admin, content, UI scaffolding the boilerplate is fairly opinionated. That gives convenience and speed for typical SaaS/web apps, but can feel heavyweight or inflexible for small‑scale tools, prototypes, or very custom architectures.

Created by M Gilang Januar, NextReady offers a robust foundation for building scalable SaaS applications.

When building a SaaS application, choosing the right payment integration is crucial for monetization success. Let's compare the payment options available in Gravity and NextReady.

Both Gravity and NextReady are excellent choices for building SaaS applications. Your decision should be based on your specific requirements, budget, and technical preferences.

Gravity is ideal if you're looking for a more affordable option with built-in authentication.

NextReady stands out for its comprehensive feature set and is perfect for developers who need authentication.

Ultimately, both boilerplates will help you launch your SaaS product faster and more efficiently. Review the detailed comparison above, consider your project requirements, and choose the one that aligns best with your goals.