Gravity vs NativeFast

When choosing between Gravity and NativeFast, it's essential to understand the key differences that make each boilerplate unique. Both are excellent choices for building SaaS applications, but they cater to different needs and development approaches.

What is Gravity?

Gravity is a full‑stack boilerplate for JavaScript/TypeScript projects combining a Node.js backend with a React (or React Native) frontend designed to give developers a head‑start when building SaaS applications. It aims to deliver a working foundation so that you don’t need to assemble all the plumbing (auth, billing, database, UI, API) from scratch. The boilerplate includes support for multiple databases (like Postgres, MySQL, MongoDB, MariaDB and possibly others) which gives flexibility depending on your data/storage preferences. There is also a full “stack” support: server (Node.js + Express/API backend), web client (React + Tailwind or similar), and optionally native mobile clients (via React Native), which helps if you want a unified codebase for web + mobile. Beyond the core stack, Gravity claims to bundle SaaS‑ready features: authentication (email/password, magic links, social logins, 2FA, account security), subscription & billing support (with free plans, trials, seat‑based or usage billing), and a library of UI components & views (dashboard, admin tools, layout components, responsive UI, dark mode, etc.). Gravity also offers a “website/landing page template” (built with a static‑site generator + modern site tooling) useful for marketing, landing pages, pricing pages, etc. — thereby giving you both the “app core” and “public‑facing site” foundation.

Developed by Kyle Gawley, Gravity has become a popular choice among developers looking for a reliable starting point for their SaaS projects.

What is NativeFast?

NativeFast is a Next.js boilerplate that bundles backend and frontend essentials into one codebase, offering a clean project structure, ready‑to‑use authentication, database configuration, and payment/integration support so you skip the repetitive setup when building web apps. With NativeFast you get a standard folder layout (/app, /api, /components, /models etc.), environment‑config file templates, and integration points for authentication (e.g. OAuth/social login), data storage, and payment providers (Stripe or similar), which lets you launch a scalable full‑stack application with minimal initial wiring. The structure and configuration make it convenient for developers who value speed, maintainability, and convention. Keeping frontend UI, backend API, data models and environment settings in one coherent setup. By relying on this boilerplate, you save time on boilerplate tasks and can focus on product‑specific features instead of reinventing core infrastructure.

Created by Alessio Gherasim, NativeFast offers a robust foundation for building scalable SaaS applications.

When building a SaaS application, choosing the right payment integration is crucial for monetization success. Let's compare the payment options available in Gravity and NativeFast.

Both Gravity and NativeFast are excellent choices for building SaaS applications. Your decision should be based on your specific requirements, budget, and technical preferences.

Gravity is ideal if you're looking for a feature-rich solution with built-in authentication.

NativeFast stands out for its competitive pricing and is perfect for developers who need specific features.

Ultimately, both boilerplates will help you launch your SaaS product faster and more efficiently. Review the detailed comparison above, consider your project requirements, and choose the one that aligns best with your goals.