Detailed Comparison 2025
FastPocket vs Makerkit
Compare FastPocket and Makerkit side-by-side. We've analyzed features, pricing, and capabilities to help you choose the best boilerplate for your SaaS project.
Quick Overview

FastPocket
FastPocket is a boilerplate / starter‑kit for building web apps using PocketBase (as backend/database) paired with a modern frontend (Astro + React + TailwindCSS + daisyUI). It aims to give you a working foundation including authentication, payment integration, UI components, and deployment templates so you can move fast from idea to working app. FastPocket bundles support for payment processing via Stripe (one‑time and recurring payments) and ensures that your Stripe products synchronize with PocketBase which helps if you’re building a monetized web service. It also comes with a component library + theming (TailwindCSS + daisyUI) and pre-built UI components / layout structures (buttons, modals, cards, etc.), enabling rapid UI setup without designing everything from scratch. In addition, FastPocket provides documentation and deployment templates (for hosting backend and frontend), which lowers friction when going live. FastPocket fits developers or small teams who want to: start a web‑app or SaaS quickly, avoid spending time wiring auth, payments, backend, frontend, and instead focus on building the “real” product logic or features. Because it uses PocketBase, it can be a lightweight yet functional backend for small to medium‑sized apps. It also works well if you appreciate having an integrated stack (backend + payments + frontend + UI) that plays nicely together ideal for prototypes, MVPs, or first versions of a product.
Key Features

Makerkit
MakerKit is a SaaS‑starter boilerplate built for modern React/Next.js (also supporting Remix/Supabase or Firebase variants) that tries to give you a production‑ready foundation, rather than a barebones template. At its core MakerKit bundles authentication (email, social login, magic‑link, optional MFA), user and team/organization management (multi‑tenancy, roles, invitations), and subscription/billing support via payment providers (Stripe or Lemon Squeezy). The boilerplate comes styled by default using a modern UI stack with Tailwind CSS (and Shadcn/Radix‑based UI components), with light/dark mode and includes UI scaffolding for dashboards, admin panels, marketing pages, blog/documentation pages, and a customizable layout structure. MakerKit aims to reduce the time and effort needed to ship a SaaS: instead of wiring up auth, payments, data layer, UI and common SaaS flows from scratch, you get a working skeleton that you can extend, customize, and build on. This includes also support for serverless or traditional hosting setups, built‑in support for sending stylized transactional emails, and optional plugins/features (like documentation/blog generation, admin dashboards, analytics hooks, and more) to help bootstrap both the product and its public-facing/marketing side.
Key Features
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | FastPocket$75 | Makerkit$349 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $75 | $349 |
| Developer | Samuel Wyndham | Giancarlo Buomprisco |
| Authentication | ||
| Stripe Integration | ||
| Paddle Integration | ||
| Lemon Squeezy | ||
| Dodo Payments | ||
| Polar | ||
| Creem | ||
| Admin Panel | ||
| User Dashboard | ||
| Subscriptions | ||
| Blog | ||
| SEO Optimized | ||
| Documentation | ||
| Support | ||
| Tailwind CSS | ||
| API | ||
| Two-Factor Auth | ||
| Multi-Tenancy | ||
| Teams | ||
| Shadcn UI | ||
| View Details | View Page | View Page |
FastPocket vs Makerkit: Detailed Analysis
When choosing between FastPocket and Makerkit, it's essential to understand the key differences that make each boilerplate unique. Both are excellent choices for building SaaS applications, but they cater to different needs and development approaches.
What is FastPocket?
FastPocket is a boilerplate / starter‑kit for building web apps using PocketBase (as backend/database) paired with a modern frontend (Astro + React + TailwindCSS + daisyUI). It aims to give you a working foundation including authentication, payment integration, UI components, and deployment templates so you can move fast from idea to working app. FastPocket bundles support for payment processing via Stripe (one‑time and recurring payments) and ensures that your Stripe products synchronize with PocketBase which helps if you’re building a monetized web service. It also comes with a component library + theming (TailwindCSS + daisyUI) and pre-built UI components / layout structures (buttons, modals, cards, etc.), enabling rapid UI setup without designing everything from scratch. In addition, FastPocket provides documentation and deployment templates (for hosting backend and frontend), which lowers friction when going live. FastPocket fits developers or small teams who want to: start a web‑app or SaaS quickly, avoid spending time wiring auth, payments, backend, frontend, and instead focus on building the “real” product logic or features. Because it uses PocketBase, it can be a lightweight yet functional backend for small to medium‑sized apps. It also works well if you appreciate having an integrated stack (backend + payments + frontend + UI) that plays nicely together ideal for prototypes, MVPs, or first versions of a product.
Developed by Samuel Wyndham, FastPocket has become a popular choice among developers looking for a reliable starting point for their SaaS projects.
What is Makerkit?
MakerKit is a SaaS‑starter boilerplate built for modern React/Next.js (also supporting Remix/Supabase or Firebase variants) that tries to give you a production‑ready foundation, rather than a barebones template. At its core MakerKit bundles authentication (email, social login, magic‑link, optional MFA), user and team/organization management (multi‑tenancy, roles, invitations), and subscription/billing support via payment providers (Stripe or Lemon Squeezy). The boilerplate comes styled by default using a modern UI stack with Tailwind CSS (and Shadcn/Radix‑based UI components), with light/dark mode and includes UI scaffolding for dashboards, admin panels, marketing pages, blog/documentation pages, and a customizable layout structure. MakerKit aims to reduce the time and effort needed to ship a SaaS: instead of wiring up auth, payments, data layer, UI and common SaaS flows from scratch, you get a working skeleton that you can extend, customize, and build on. This includes also support for serverless or traditional hosting setups, built‑in support for sending stylized transactional emails, and optional plugins/features (like documentation/blog generation, admin dashboards, analytics hooks, and more) to help bootstrap both the product and its public-facing/marketing side.
Created by Giancarlo Buomprisco, Makerkit offers a robust foundation for building scalable SaaS applications.
Need to Promote Your Startup or Boilerplate?

Check out LaunchDirectories.com to get your startup or boilerplate listed in 100+ product launch directories and gain valuable backlinks from high-authority platforms. This is especially effective for new products looking to quickly build domain authority and gain backlinks.
Payment Integration: FastPocket vs Makerkit
Key Differences Between FastPocket and Makerkit
💰 Pricing
FastPocket is priced at $75, while Makerkit costs $349. This makes FastPocket the more budget-friendly option, potentially saving you 274 dollars.
⚡ Features & Capabilities
Both boilerplates include authentication systems, making it easy to implement user login and registration.
Payment processing is available in both options. FastPocket supports Stripe, while Makerkit integrates with Stripe.
Makerkit includes an admin panel for easier application management.
🎯 Best Use Cases
FastPocket
- • SaaS startups looking for quick deployment
- • Projects requiring authentication
- • Teams with limited budgets
Makerkit
- • SaaS applications needing rapid development
- • Projects requiring authentication
- • Teams with flexible budgets
- • Multi-tenant applications
When to Choose FastPocket vs Makerkit
Choose FastPocket if:
- You're looking for the most cost-effective solution
- You want to start with FastPocket's specific tech stack and approach
- Your project aligns with FastPocket's feature set
Choose Makerkit if:
- You require an admin panel for managing your application
- You're building a multi-tenant SaaS application
- You prefer Makerkit's specific approach and features
- Your requirements match Makerkit's capabilities
Final Verdict: FastPocket vs Makerkit
Both FastPocket and Makerkit are excellent choices for building SaaS applications. Your decision should be based on your specific requirements, budget, and technical preferences.
FastPocket is ideal if you're looking for a more affordable option with built-in authentication.
Makerkit stands out for its comprehensive feature set and is perfect for developers who need authentication.
Ultimately, both boilerplates will help you launch your SaaS product faster and more efficiently. Review the detailed comparison above, consider your project requirements, and choose the one that aligns best with your goals.
Frequently Asked Questions: FastPocket vs Makerkit
Which is better: FastPocket or Makerkit?
The "better" choice depends on your specific needs. FastPocket excels in affordability, while Makerkitstands out for its feature set. Consider your budget, required features, and development timeline when making your decision.
What's the price difference between FastPocket and Makerkit?
FastPocket costs $75 while Makerkit is priced at $349. That's a difference of $274. Both are one-time payments with no recurring fees, making them cost-effective long-term investments for your SaaS project.
Can I switch from FastPocket to Makerkit later?
While technically possible, switching boilerplates mid-project is challenging and time-consuming. Each boilerplate has its own architecture, dependencies, and patterns. It's best to carefully evaluate both options now and choose the one that best fits your long-term needs to avoid costly migrations later.
Do FastPocket and Makerkit offer similar features?
Both boilerplates offer core SaaS features, but with different implementations and additional capabilities. Check the detailed feature comparison table above to see exactly which features each boilerplate includes. Key differences include payment integrations, authentication systems, and admin panel availability.
Which boilerplate is better for beginners?
For beginners, consider factors like documentation quality, community support, and code complexity. Both FastPocket and Makerkit are designed to be developer-friendly, but your choice should depend on your familiarity with their respective tech stacks and the learning resources available.
Are there any hidden costs with FastPocket or Makerkit?
Both boilerplates are one-time purchases with no recurring licensing fees. However, you may incur costs for third-party services they integrate with (like payment processors, email services, or hosting platforms). These operational costs are separate from the boilerplate purchase and apply to any SaaS application.
How long does it take to launch with FastPocket vs Makerkit?
Both boilerplates significantly reduce development time compared to building from scratch. Depending on your customization needs, you could launch a basic SaaS product in days or weeks rather than months. The exact timeline depends on your specific requirements, team size, and development experience.
Explore More Comparisons
Browse all boilerplates and find the perfect starter kit for your SaaS project.