DaaSBoilerplate vs Gravity

When choosing between DaaSBoilerplate and Gravity, it's essential to understand the key differences that make each boilerplate unique. Both are excellent choices for building SaaS applications, but they cater to different needs and development approaches.

What is DaaSBoilerplate?

DaaSBoilerplate is a ready‑made starter kit aimed at people who want to launch a “Data as a Service” product quickly a web application where you provide data or datasets to customers, with access control, payment, and management all built in. When you get DaaSBoilerplate, you receive a production‑ready codebase built on Next.js + TypeScript, configured to run with Docker for easy deployment. It comes with built-in user authentication and multi‑tenancy (so you can support multiple accounts or organizations), an admin panel and user dashboard, payment integrations (via Stripe and Lemon Squeezy), and tools for content & marketing: blog, documentation or marketing pages, which makes it easier to launch publicly without building CMS or marketing infrastructure from scratch. On top of that, DaaSBoilerplate claims “one‑click deployment” via Docker, plus data‑upload / import functionality meaning you can upload or change dataset content and have it available quickly, which is core if you plan to provide data to customers rather than a traditional SaaS feature set.

Developed by Fraser, DaaSBoilerplate has become a popular choice among developers looking for a reliable starting point for their SaaS projects.

What is Gravity?

Gravity is a full‑stack boilerplate for JavaScript/TypeScript projects combining a Node.js backend with a React (or React Native) frontend designed to give developers a head‑start when building SaaS applications. It aims to deliver a working foundation so that you don’t need to assemble all the plumbing (auth, billing, database, UI, API) from scratch. The boilerplate includes support for multiple databases (like Postgres, MySQL, MongoDB, MariaDB and possibly others) which gives flexibility depending on your data/storage preferences. There is also a full “stack” support: server (Node.js + Express/API backend), web client (React + Tailwind or similar), and optionally native mobile clients (via React Native), which helps if you want a unified codebase for web + mobile. Beyond the core stack, Gravity claims to bundle SaaS‑ready features: authentication (email/password, magic links, social logins, 2FA, account security), subscription & billing support (with free plans, trials, seat‑based or usage billing), and a library of UI components & views (dashboard, admin tools, layout components, responsive UI, dark mode, etc.). Gravity also offers a “website/landing page template” (built with a static‑site generator + modern site tooling) useful for marketing, landing pages, pricing pages, etc. — thereby giving you both the “app core” and “public‑facing site” foundation.

Created by Kyle Gawley, Gravity offers a robust foundation for building scalable SaaS applications.

When building a SaaS application, choosing the right payment integration is crucial for monetization success. Let's compare the payment options available in DaaSBoilerplate and Gravity.

Both DaaSBoilerplate and Gravity are excellent choices for building SaaS applications. Your decision should be based on your specific requirements, budget, and technical preferences.

DaaSBoilerplate is ideal if you're looking for a more affordable option with built-in authentication.

Gravity stands out for its comprehensive feature set and is perfect for developers who need authentication.

Ultimately, both boilerplates will help you launch your SaaS product faster and more efficiently. Review the detailed comparison above, consider your project requirements, and choose the one that aligns best with your goals.