BuilderKit vs NextReady

When choosing between BuilderKit and NextReady, it's essential to understand the key differences that make each boilerplate unique. Both are excellent choices for building SaaS applications, but they cater to different needs and development approaches.

What is BuilderKit?

BuilderKit.ai is a boilerplate / starter‑kit built with Next.js + Supabase + Tailwind CSS + TypeScript, aimed at helping developers launch AI‑powered SaaS/web applications quickly. Rather than being a minimal template, BuilderKit comes pre‑wired with modules and features that cover many needs for an AI SaaS: authentication (email, Google auth, magic‑link), payments (via Stripe or LemonSqueezy), email integrations, admin dashboard, SEO‑friendly landing pages & waitlist pages, and even pre-built AI‑app demos. On top of that, BuilderKit bundles 10‑15+ ready-to-use AI tools / applications: for example chat, image generation, PDF‑chat, voice transcription, image‑enhancing / upscaling, and more, so you don’t just get a skeleton, but a suite of working AI‑powered features you can build on or customize. he code is distributed via a GitHub repo, and once set up (with environment variables, dependencies installed, etc.) you can run and deploy the app commonly on platforms like Vercel.

Developed by Vatsal Sanghvi, BuilderKit has become a popular choice among developers looking for a reliable starting point for their SaaS projects.

What is NextReady?

NextReady is a full‑stack boilerplate built on Next.js + Prisma + shadcn/ui (with TypeScript) a ready‑made starting point for web applications including SaaS, dashboards, or subscription‑based products. It aims to let developers skip routine setup work (authentication, payments, user & role management, payment/invoice flows, content/markdown support, and basic UI scaffolding) and jump straight into building the core features of their app. NextReady comes pre‑wired with magic‑link authentication, role‑based authorization, a built‑in admin panel, user and invoice management, payment integration (using payment providers like Lemon Squeezy or similar), email support, database setup with Prisma models, and basic layouts/components for landing pages, blogs or content pages with SEO‑ready structure. It also supports additional features that many modern apps benefit from markdown‑based content, waiting‑list or onboarding flows, and optional integrations (e.g. AI SDKs, payment gateways beyond simple plans) depending on your needs. Because it bundles many features: auth, payments, admin, content, UI scaffolding the boilerplate is fairly opinionated. That gives convenience and speed for typical SaaS/web apps, but can feel heavyweight or inflexible for small‑scale tools, prototypes, or very custom architectures.

Created by M Gilang Januar, NextReady offers a robust foundation for building scalable SaaS applications.

When building a SaaS application, choosing the right payment integration is crucial for monetization success. Let's compare the payment options available in BuilderKit and NextReady.

Both BuilderKit and NextReady are excellent choices for building SaaS applications. Your decision should be based on your specific requirements, budget, and technical preferences.

BuilderKit is ideal if you're looking for a more affordable option with built-in authentication.

NextReady stands out for its comprehensive feature set and is perfect for developers who need authentication.

Ultimately, both boilerplates will help you launch your SaaS product faster and more efficiently. Review the detailed comparison above, consider your project requirements, and choose the one that aligns best with your goals.