Bedrock vs NextReady

When choosing between Bedrock and NextReady, it's essential to understand the key differences that make each boilerplate unique. Both are excellent choices for building SaaS applications, but they cater to different needs and development approaches.

What is Bedrock?

Bedrock is a full‑stack boilerplate for building SaaS products, built on Next.js and GraphQL. It’s designed to take care of the usual foundational work: user authentication, subscription payments (via Stripe), team/project support (multi‑project or multi‑tenant logic, invitations & membership handling), email integration, database setup, API wiring (using e.g. Prisma + GraphQL schema), and general plumbing like linting, formatting, code generation, and CI/testing setup. Importantly, Bedrock ships “unstyled” meaning it doesn’t impose a UI or design system on you. What it gives you is the backend logic, data flow, and structural foundation; the visual layer is entirely yours (or up to whatever UI framework/components you choose). Because of its modular architecture, many of the bundled tools and integrations are optional you can drop or swap parts if they don’t fit your preferences.

Developed by Max Stoiber, Bedrock has become a popular choice among developers looking for a reliable starting point for their SaaS projects.

What is NextReady?

NextReady is a full‑stack boilerplate built on Next.js + Prisma + shadcn/ui (with TypeScript) a ready‑made starting point for web applications including SaaS, dashboards, or subscription‑based products. It aims to let developers skip routine setup work (authentication, payments, user & role management, payment/invoice flows, content/markdown support, and basic UI scaffolding) and jump straight into building the core features of their app. NextReady comes pre‑wired with magic‑link authentication, role‑based authorization, a built‑in admin panel, user and invoice management, payment integration (using payment providers like Lemon Squeezy or similar), email support, database setup with Prisma models, and basic layouts/components for landing pages, blogs or content pages with SEO‑ready structure. It also supports additional features that many modern apps benefit from markdown‑based content, waiting‑list or onboarding flows, and optional integrations (e.g. AI SDKs, payment gateways beyond simple plans) depending on your needs. Because it bundles many features: auth, payments, admin, content, UI scaffolding the boilerplate is fairly opinionated. That gives convenience and speed for typical SaaS/web apps, but can feel heavyweight or inflexible for small‑scale tools, prototypes, or very custom architectures.

Created by M Gilang Januar, NextReady offers a robust foundation for building scalable SaaS applications.

When building a SaaS application, choosing the right payment integration is crucial for monetization success. Let's compare the payment options available in Bedrock and NextReady.

Both Bedrock and NextReady are excellent choices for building SaaS applications. Your decision should be based on your specific requirements, budget, and technical preferences.

Bedrock is ideal if you're looking for a more affordable option with built-in authentication.

NextReady stands out for its comprehensive feature set and is perfect for developers who need authentication.

Ultimately, both boilerplates will help you launch your SaaS product faster and more efficiently. Review the detailed comparison above, consider your project requirements, and choose the one that aligns best with your goals.