Bedrock vs NextJet

When choosing between Bedrock and NextJet, it's essential to understand the key differences that make each boilerplate unique. Both are excellent choices for building SaaS applications, but they cater to different needs and development approaches.

What is Bedrock?

Bedrock is a full‑stack boilerplate for building SaaS products, built on Next.js and GraphQL. It’s designed to take care of the usual foundational work: user authentication, subscription payments (via Stripe), team/project support (multi‑project or multi‑tenant logic, invitations & membership handling), email integration, database setup, API wiring (using e.g. Prisma + GraphQL schema), and general plumbing like linting, formatting, code generation, and CI/testing setup. Importantly, Bedrock ships “unstyled” meaning it doesn’t impose a UI or design system on you. What it gives you is the backend logic, data flow, and structural foundation; the visual layer is entirely yours (or up to whatever UI framework/components you choose). Because of its modular architecture, many of the bundled tools and integrations are optional you can drop or swap parts if they don’t fit your preferences.

Developed by Max Stoiber, Bedrock has become a popular choice among developers looking for a reliable starting point for their SaaS projects.

What is NextJet?

NextJet is a full‑stack SaaS boilerplate built with Next.js, TypeScript and modern web‑app tooling, made to give developers a solid, production‑ready foundation when building subscription‑based or SaaS‑style applications. Out of the box it handles core infrastructure: user authentication + authorization (including OAuth and magic‑link support), payment/subscription logic via Stripe or Lemon Squeezy, and pre‑built user dashboards + admin panel. It also includes content‑management and marketing‑side features: a blog and documentation system using MDX, a customizable landing/marketing site, email templates, and onboarding flows. The project follows a modular, maintainable architecture (monorepo via Turborepo, clean folder structure, typesafety via TypeScript), which helps keep code organized, useful if you plan to grow or scale the app over time. Because much of the “plumbing” is already configured, you can skip repetitive setup and get to building your product‑specific logic faster. At the same time, using NextJet means trusting its built‑in architecture, tech stack and conventions. If your project needs a very different stack, unusual backend/data requirements or a minimal footprint, you might need to refactor or drop parts of what comes with the boilerplate.

Created by Renas Hassan, NextJet offers a robust foundation for building scalable SaaS applications.

When building a SaaS application, choosing the right payment integration is crucial for monetization success. Let's compare the payment options available in Bedrock and NextJet.

Both Bedrock and NextJet are excellent choices for building SaaS applications. Your decision should be based on your specific requirements, budget, and technical preferences.

Bedrock is ideal if you're looking for a feature-rich solution with built-in authentication.

NextJet stands out for its competitive pricing and is perfect for developers who need authentication.

Ultimately, both boilerplates will help you launch your SaaS product faster and more efficiently. Review the detailed comparison above, consider your project requirements, and choose the one that aligns best with your goals.