Bedrock vs Dome

When choosing between Bedrock and Dome, it's essential to understand the key differences that make each boilerplate unique. Both are excellent choices for building SaaS applications, but they cater to different needs and development approaches.

What is Bedrock?

Bedrock is a full‑stack boilerplate for building SaaS products, built on Next.js and GraphQL. It’s designed to take care of the usual foundational work: user authentication, subscription payments (via Stripe), team/project support (multi‑project or multi‑tenant logic, invitations & membership handling), email integration, database setup, API wiring (using e.g. Prisma + GraphQL schema), and general plumbing like linting, formatting, code generation, and CI/testing setup. Importantly, Bedrock ships “unstyled” meaning it doesn’t impose a UI or design system on you. What it gives you is the backend logic, data flow, and structural foundation; the visual layer is entirely yours (or up to whatever UI framework/components you choose). Because of its modular architecture, many of the bundled tools and integrations are optional you can drop or swap parts if they don’t fit your preferences.

Developed by Max Stoiber, Bedrock has become a popular choice among developers looking for a reliable starting point for their SaaS projects.

What is Dome?

Dome SaaS Validation Template is a full‑stack boilerplate built on Next.js + Tailwind CSS, designed to help developers launch a SaaS MVP (minimum‑viable‑product) quickly. It bundles essential infrastructure authentication (social login, magic link, NextAuth), payment integrations (via Stripe and LemonSqueezy), email support (e.g. using Mailgun), analytics, and customer‑feedback tools (like chatbot or messaging integrations) all preconfigured to spare you the boilerplate wiring. On the frontend, the template provides a ready-to-use landing page, blog, pricing and FAQ pages, standard marketing and SaaS‑site sections (hero, features, testimonials, CTA, banners, etc.), and responsive layout out of the box. That means you don’t start with an empty shell, instead you get a functioning, production‑ready codebase where much of the common SaaS plumbing (UI pages, auth, payments, database logic via Prisma, etc.) is already connected. The main advantage of using Dome’s SaaS Validation Template is speed it reduces the time to launch a SaaS or MVP drastically by handing you a full stack ready for deployment, with integrations and default pages. This lets you focus on business logic, custom features, and go‑to‑market strategy instead of building foundational infrastructure. However, adopting this template also means accepting its architecture and predefined integrations: Next.js, Tailwind CSS, Prisma, Stripe/LemonSqueezy, Mailgun, and the included feedback/analytics integrations. If your project needs a radically different stack, custom database structure, or nonstandard integrations, you may need to refactor or remove parts — which can bring overhead. Also, as with many full‑featured boilerplates, you may end up with features you don’t need (blog, blog CMS, chat support, analytics) which adds extra complexity.

Created by Thom Crowe, Dome offers a robust foundation for building scalable SaaS applications.

When building a SaaS application, choosing the right payment integration is crucial for monetization success. Let's compare the payment options available in Bedrock and Dome.

Both Bedrock and Dome are excellent choices for building SaaS applications. Your decision should be based on your specific requirements, budget, and technical preferences.

Bedrock is ideal if you're looking for a feature-rich solution with built-in authentication.

Dome stands out for its competitive pricing and is perfect for developers who need authentication.

Ultimately, both boilerplates will help you launch your SaaS product faster and more efficiently. Review the detailed comparison above, consider your project requirements, and choose the one that aligns best with your goals.