Bedrock vs Dirstarter

When choosing between Bedrock and Dirstarter, it's essential to understand the key differences that make each boilerplate unique. Both are excellent choices for building SaaS applications, but they cater to different needs and development approaches.

What is Bedrock?

Bedrock is a full‑stack boilerplate for building SaaS products, built on Next.js and GraphQL. It’s designed to take care of the usual foundational work: user authentication, subscription payments (via Stripe), team/project support (multi‑project or multi‑tenant logic, invitations & membership handling), email integration, database setup, API wiring (using e.g. Prisma + GraphQL schema), and general plumbing like linting, formatting, code generation, and CI/testing setup. Importantly, Bedrock ships “unstyled” meaning it doesn’t impose a UI or design system on you. What it gives you is the backend logic, data flow, and structural foundation; the visual layer is entirely yours (or up to whatever UI framework/components you choose). Because of its modular architecture, many of the bundled tools and integrations are optional you can drop or swap parts if they don’t fit your preferences.

Developed by Max Stoiber, Bedrock has become a popular choice among developers looking for a reliable starting point for their SaaS projects.

What is Dirstarter?

Dirstarter is a full-featured boilerplate built with Next.js (with TypeScript) designed for launching directory-style websites. It gives you a ready-made foundation: authentication and user management, admin panel, listing submission and management, payment integration via Stripe, and monetization options (premium listings, featured spots, ads, affiliate-links, etc.). Beyond that, Dirstarter includes SEO-friendly page structure, support for multiple languages (i18n), and built-in tools for content creation (including AI-powered content generation to help bootstrap listings and categories). On the technical side, Dirstarter leans on a modern, maintainable stack: Next.js, a modern ORM (e.g. Prisma), CSS via Tailwind CSS, and UI components from shadcn/ui / Radix UI which means you’ll get a responsive, customizable UI and a code structure that’s relatively straightforward to work with and extend. The value proposition of Dirstarter is that instead of spending weeks building the backbone of a directory site: user flows, payments, listings DB, admin UI, monetization logic, i18n, SEO - you get a working system out-of-the-box and can focus immediately on content, branding, and growth. For someone building a directory or listing-type website (local businesses, tools marketplace, niche listing directory, etc.), this can significantly reduce time to launch. However, adopting Dirstarter also means accepting its architecture and conventions. It’s opinionated: you're committing to the tech choices (Next.js + Prisma + Tailwind + the integrations Dirstarter bundles). If your project requires a drastically different backend setup, custom data models or unusual flows, you may spend extra effort altering or stripping parts you don’t need. Moreover, because it offers a lot of built-in features (payments, content generation, monetization, i18n, admin, etc.), you may end up with more “surface area” than needed which can complicate maintenance if you only need a simple directory.

Created by Piotr Kulpinski, Dirstarter offers a robust foundation for building scalable SaaS applications.

When building a SaaS application, choosing the right payment integration is crucial for monetization success. Let's compare the payment options available in Bedrock and Dirstarter.

Both Bedrock and Dirstarter are excellent choices for building SaaS applications. Your decision should be based on your specific requirements, budget, and technical preferences.

Bedrock is ideal if you're looking for a feature-rich solution with built-in authentication.

Dirstarter stands out for its competitive pricing and is perfect for developers who need authentication.

Ultimately, both boilerplates will help you launch your SaaS product faster and more efficiently. Review the detailed comparison above, consider your project requirements, and choose the one that aligns best with your goals.