Detailed Comparison 2025
ApparenceKit vs Rockstack
Compare ApparenceKit and Rockstack side-by-side. We've analyzed features, pricing, and capabilities to help you choose the best boilerplate for your SaaS project.
Quick Overview

ApparenceKit
ApparenceKit is a template generator for Flutter, created by a team with years of Flutter-app experience. On the surface, it’s pitched as a way to bypass many of the repetitive, boilerplate tasks that come with building a mobile (or web) app from scratch: authentication, user flows, payments/subscriptions, push notifications, onboarding, i18n (multilanguage), analytics, theming, and more. When you use ApparenceKit, you start your project by running a CLI that scaffolds a full Flutter app wired up with a backend option (you can choose between Firebase, Supabase or a custom REST API), pre-built modules for auth, subscriptions, notifications, and navigation, plus optional modules such as feedback/voting, translations, remote config, and more. This means that instead of spending weeks setting up the basics of your app (login logic, paywalls, push-notifications, internationalization, UI navigation, etc.), you get a “ready-to-go” foundation that you can build on immediately. For many simple or medium-complexity apps (MVPs, prototypes, early-stage mobile products), that can be a significant time-saver.

Rockstack
This boilerplate is a comprehensive solution for building SaaS applications, featuring three main sections essential for any app: Public Pages (like Landing, Login, Contact), Admin (/admin for Dashboard, Users, Settings), and App (/app/:tenant for tenant-specific dashboards). It leverages a next-generation Node.js and TypeScript ORM with a Repository Pattern for efficient data management. The platform supports flexible payment models through Stripe, including flat-rate, user-based, and one-time fees. Enhance performance with data caching, and customize your app's appearance using Tailwind CSS. Additionally, it offers multilingual support, built-in user management, and a reliable email service for traRockStack is a full‑stack SaaS boilerplate / kit designed to work with several modern JavaScript frameworks. Including Next.js, Remix, or SvelteKit and intended to give you a ready-to-go foundation for building subscription‑based, multi‑tenant web applications. With RockStack you get a basic SaaS “shell” that includes core needed parts: built‑in email/password authentication and user management (without requiring external auth libraries), tenant/organization support so different customers/users can live under separate “workspaces,” subscription and payment flows (flat‑rate, one‑time, per‑seat or usage-based) via Stripe, and support for roles & permissions to help manage access control. RockStack is a full‑stack SaaS boilerplate / kit designed to work with several modern JavaScript frameworks. Including Next.js, Remix, or SvelteKit and intended to give you a ready-to-go foundation for building subscription‑based, multi‑tenant web applications. With RockStack you get a basic SaaS “shell” that includes core needed parts: built‑in email/password authentication and user management (without requiring external auth libraries), tenant/organization support so different customers/users can live under separate “workspaces,” subscription and payment flows (flat‑rate, one‑time, per‑seat or usage-based) via Stripe, and support for roles & permissions to help manage access control. The kit provides a UI + layout foundation: a public “marketing / landing” section (for pages like landing page, pricing, contact, login), an admin dashboard area (for app owners), and the application dashboard area (for tenants/users) so both the public‑facing site and internal user/admin interfaces are ready.
Key Features
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | ApparenceKit$149 | Rockstack$99 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $149 | $99 |
| Developer | Apparence | Alexandro Martínez |
| Authentication | ||
| Stripe Integration | ||
| Paddle Integration | ||
| Lemon Squeezy | ||
| Dodo Payments | ||
| Polar | ||
| Creem | ||
| Admin Panel | ||
| User Dashboard | ||
| Subscriptions | ||
| Blog | ||
| SEO Optimized | ||
| Documentation | ||
| Support | ||
| Tailwind CSS | ||
| API | ||
| Two-Factor Auth | ||
| Multi-Tenancy | ||
| Teams | ||
| Shadcn UI | ||
| View Details | View Page | View Page |
ApparenceKit vs Rockstack: Detailed Analysis
When choosing between ApparenceKit and Rockstack, it's essential to understand the key differences that make each boilerplate unique. Both are excellent choices for building SaaS applications, but they cater to different needs and development approaches.
What is ApparenceKit?
ApparenceKit is a template generator for Flutter, created by a team with years of Flutter-app experience. On the surface, it’s pitched as a way to bypass many of the repetitive, boilerplate tasks that come with building a mobile (or web) app from scratch: authentication, user flows, payments/subscriptions, push notifications, onboarding, i18n (multilanguage), analytics, theming, and more. When you use ApparenceKit, you start your project by running a CLI that scaffolds a full Flutter app wired up with a backend option (you can choose between Firebase, Supabase or a custom REST API), pre-built modules for auth, subscriptions, notifications, and navigation, plus optional modules such as feedback/voting, translations, remote config, and more. This means that instead of spending weeks setting up the basics of your app (login logic, paywalls, push-notifications, internationalization, UI navigation, etc.), you get a “ready-to-go” foundation that you can build on immediately. For many simple or medium-complexity apps (MVPs, prototypes, early-stage mobile products), that can be a significant time-saver.
Developed by Apparence, ApparenceKit has become a popular choice among developers looking for a reliable starting point for their SaaS projects.
What is Rockstack?
This boilerplate is a comprehensive solution for building SaaS applications, featuring three main sections essential for any app: Public Pages (like Landing, Login, Contact), Admin (/admin for Dashboard, Users, Settings), and App (/app/:tenant for tenant-specific dashboards). It leverages a next-generation Node.js and TypeScript ORM with a Repository Pattern for efficient data management. The platform supports flexible payment models through Stripe, including flat-rate, user-based, and one-time fees. Enhance performance with data caching, and customize your app's appearance using Tailwind CSS. Additionally, it offers multilingual support, built-in user management, and a reliable email service for traRockStack is a full‑stack SaaS boilerplate / kit designed to work with several modern JavaScript frameworks. Including Next.js, Remix, or SvelteKit and intended to give you a ready-to-go foundation for building subscription‑based, multi‑tenant web applications. With RockStack you get a basic SaaS “shell” that includes core needed parts: built‑in email/password authentication and user management (without requiring external auth libraries), tenant/organization support so different customers/users can live under separate “workspaces,” subscription and payment flows (flat‑rate, one‑time, per‑seat or usage-based) via Stripe, and support for roles & permissions to help manage access control. RockStack is a full‑stack SaaS boilerplate / kit designed to work with several modern JavaScript frameworks. Including Next.js, Remix, or SvelteKit and intended to give you a ready-to-go foundation for building subscription‑based, multi‑tenant web applications. With RockStack you get a basic SaaS “shell” that includes core needed parts: built‑in email/password authentication and user management (without requiring external auth libraries), tenant/organization support so different customers/users can live under separate “workspaces,” subscription and payment flows (flat‑rate, one‑time, per‑seat or usage-based) via Stripe, and support for roles & permissions to help manage access control. The kit provides a UI + layout foundation: a public “marketing / landing” section (for pages like landing page, pricing, contact, login), an admin dashboard area (for app owners), and the application dashboard area (for tenants/users) so both the public‑facing site and internal user/admin interfaces are ready.
Created by Alexandro Martínez, Rockstack offers a robust foundation for building scalable SaaS applications.
Need to Promote Your Startup or Boilerplate?

Check out LaunchDirectories.com to get your startup or boilerplate listed in 100+ product launch directories and gain valuable backlinks from high-authority platforms. This is especially effective for new products looking to quickly build domain authority and gain backlinks.
Payment Integration: ApparenceKit vs Rockstack
When building a SaaS application, choosing the right payment integration is crucial for monetization success. Let's compare the payment options available in ApparenceKit and Rockstack.
Neither boilerplate includes pre-built payment integrations. You'll need to implement your preferred payment solution manually. Consider using Stripe, Lemon Squeezy, or Paddle for your SaaS monetization.
Key Differences Between ApparenceKit and Rockstack
💰 Pricing
ApparenceKit is priced at $149, while Rockstack costs $99. Rockstack offers better value at a lower price point, saving you 50 dollars.
⚡ Features & Capabilities
Rockstack includes authentication, while ApparenceKit does not.
Rockstack includes an admin panel for easier application management.
🎯 Best Use Cases
ApparenceKit
- • SaaS startups looking for quick deployment
- • Projects requiring custom features
- • Teams with limited budgets
Rockstack
- • SaaS applications needing rapid development
- • Projects requiring authentication
- • Teams with limited budgets
- • Multi-tenant applications
When to Choose ApparenceKit vs Rockstack
Choose ApparenceKit if:
- You want to start with ApparenceKit's specific tech stack and approach
- Your project aligns with ApparenceKit's feature set
Choose Rockstack if:
- You're looking for the most cost-effective solution
- You need built-in authentication out of the box
- You require an admin panel for managing your application
- You're building a multi-tenant SaaS application
- You prefer Rockstack's specific approach and features
- Your requirements match Rockstack's capabilities
Final Verdict: ApparenceKit vs Rockstack
Both ApparenceKit and Rockstack are excellent choices for building SaaS applications. Your decision should be based on your specific requirements, budget, and technical preferences.
ApparenceKit is ideal if you're looking for a feature-rich solution with specific capabilities.
Rockstack stands out for its competitive pricing and is perfect for developers who need authentication.
Ultimately, both boilerplates will help you launch your SaaS product faster and more efficiently. Review the detailed comparison above, consider your project requirements, and choose the one that aligns best with your goals.
Frequently Asked Questions: ApparenceKit vs Rockstack
Which is better: ApparenceKit or Rockstack?
The "better" choice depends on your specific needs. ApparenceKit excels in comprehensive features, while Rockstackstands out for value pricing. Consider your budget, required features, and development timeline when making your decision.
What's the price difference between ApparenceKit and Rockstack?
ApparenceKit costs $149 while Rockstack is priced at $99. That's a difference of $50. Both are one-time payments with no recurring fees, making them cost-effective long-term investments for your SaaS project.
Can I switch from ApparenceKit to Rockstack later?
While technically possible, switching boilerplates mid-project is challenging and time-consuming. Each boilerplate has its own architecture, dependencies, and patterns. It's best to carefully evaluate both options now and choose the one that best fits your long-term needs to avoid costly migrations later.
Do ApparenceKit and Rockstack offer similar features?
Both boilerplates offer core SaaS features, but with different implementations and additional capabilities. Check the detailed feature comparison table above to see exactly which features each boilerplate includes. Key differences include payment integrations, authentication systems, and admin panel availability.
Which boilerplate is better for beginners?
For beginners, consider factors like documentation quality, community support, and code complexity. Both ApparenceKit and Rockstack are designed to be developer-friendly, but your choice should depend on your familiarity with their respective tech stacks and the learning resources available.
Are there any hidden costs with ApparenceKit or Rockstack?
Both boilerplates are one-time purchases with no recurring licensing fees. However, you may incur costs for third-party services they integrate with (like payment processors, email services, or hosting platforms). These operational costs are separate from the boilerplate purchase and apply to any SaaS application.
How long does it take to launch with ApparenceKit vs Rockstack?
Both boilerplates significantly reduce development time compared to building from scratch. Depending on your customization needs, you could launch a basic SaaS product in days or weeks rather than months. The exact timeline depends on your specific requirements, team size, and development experience.
Explore More Comparisons
Browse all boilerplates and find the perfect starter kit for your SaaS project.