All In One Dev vs Rockstack

When choosing between All In One Dev and Rockstack, it's essential to understand the key differences that make each boilerplate unique. Both are excellent choices for building SaaS applications, but they cater to different needs and development approaches.

What is All In One Dev?

AllInOneDev aims to be a “one-codebase-for-everything” template: web, iOS and Android — unifying your frontend and backend so you don’t have to build separate projects for each platform. Under the hood it uses technologies like Next.js (for web), React Native + Expo (for mobile), along with TypeScript, a monorepo via Yarn workspaces, shared UI and logic, styling via NativeWind (tailwind-style for cross-platform) and a folder structure aimed at reuse across mobile and web. The template bundles lots of common “plumbing” out of the box: user authentication (via Firebase Auth), payment integration for both web payments (via Stripe) and in-app mobile purchases/subscriptions (via RevenueCat), analytics & user-tracking, internationalization (multi-language support), push notifications, and a set of default screens/routes (onboarding, login/register, home/dashboard, profile/settings, plus landing/pricing pages for web). In practice this means if you pick AllInOneDev you get a starting point that covers almost everything non-business-specific: cross-platform UI and styling, authentication, payments, analytics, data & backend integration, navigation, and a shared codebase to reuse across web and mobile — which can save you significant development time compared to building each platform separately. However it’s important to keep things realistic. AllInOneDev is a closed (paid) boilerplate, with a license that lets you build unlimited projects personally or with a team (but doesn’t transfer ownership of the boilerplate itself) and you must respect its license terms. By using it, you also commit to its architectural choices: monorepo structure, React-Native + Next + Expo + Firebase/RevenueCat/Stripe stack, styling via NativeWind, Redux Toolkit, etc. That’s fine if you agree with those choices — but if your project needs a drastically different architecture (something more minimal, or different backend, or different payment/infrastructure stack), adapting or decoupling from AllInOneDev might get heavy. AllInOneDev is suitable if you're starting a cross-platform app (web + mobile), want to move quickly, and don’t mind leaning on a ready-made, opinionated stack so you can focus on the actual product logic. If instead you want minimal dependencies, maximum control or want to avoid vendor lock-in (Firebase, RevenueCat, etc.), then a lighter or custom solution might be more appropriate.

Developed by Christian Esmann, All In One Dev has become a popular choice among developers looking for a reliable starting point for their SaaS projects.

What is Rockstack?

This boilerplate is a comprehensive solution for building SaaS applications, featuring three main sections essential for any app: Public Pages (like Landing, Login, Contact), Admin (/admin for Dashboard, Users, Settings), and App (/app/:tenant for tenant-specific dashboards). It leverages a next-generation Node.js and TypeScript ORM with a Repository Pattern for efficient data management. The platform supports flexible payment models through Stripe, including flat-rate, user-based, and one-time fees. Enhance performance with data caching, and customize your app's appearance using Tailwind CSS. Additionally, it offers multilingual support, built-in user management, and a reliable email service for traRockStack is a full‑stack SaaS boilerplate / kit designed to work with several modern JavaScript frameworks. Including Next.js, Remix, or SvelteKit and intended to give you a ready-to-go foundation for building subscription‑based, multi‑tenant web applications. With RockStack you get a basic SaaS “shell” that includes core needed parts: built‑in email/password authentication and user management (without requiring external auth libraries), tenant/organization support so different customers/users can live under separate “workspaces,” subscription and payment flows (flat‑rate, one‑time, per‑seat or usage-based) via Stripe, and support for roles & permissions to help manage access control. RockStack is a full‑stack SaaS boilerplate / kit designed to work with several modern JavaScript frameworks. Including Next.js, Remix, or SvelteKit and intended to give you a ready-to-go foundation for building subscription‑based, multi‑tenant web applications. With RockStack you get a basic SaaS “shell” that includes core needed parts: built‑in email/password authentication and user management (without requiring external auth libraries), tenant/organization support so different customers/users can live under separate “workspaces,” subscription and payment flows (flat‑rate, one‑time, per‑seat or usage-based) via Stripe, and support for roles & permissions to help manage access control. The kit provides a UI + layout foundation: a public “marketing / landing” section (for pages like landing page, pricing, contact, login), an admin dashboard area (for app owners), and the application dashboard area (for tenants/users) so both the public‑facing site and internal user/admin interfaces are ready.

Created by Alexandro Martínez, Rockstack offers a robust foundation for building scalable SaaS applications.

When building a SaaS application, choosing the right payment integration is crucial for monetization success. Let's compare the payment options available in All In One Dev and Rockstack.

Neither boilerplate includes pre-built payment integrations. You'll need to implement your preferred payment solution manually. Consider using Stripe, Lemon Squeezy, or Paddle for your SaaS monetization.

Both All In One Dev and Rockstack are excellent choices for building SaaS applications. Your decision should be based on your specific requirements, budget, and technical preferences.

All In One Dev is ideal if you're looking for a feature-rich solution with specific capabilities.

Rockstack stands out for its competitive pricing and is perfect for developers who need authentication.

Ultimately, both boilerplates will help you launch your SaaS product faster and more efficiently. Review the detailed comparison above, consider your project requirements, and choose the one that aligns best with your goals.