Detailed Comparison 2025

All In One Dev vs FastPocket

Compare All In One Dev and FastPocket side-by-side. We've analyzed features, pricing, and capabilities to help you choose the best boilerplate for your SaaS project.

Quick Overview

All In One Dev screenshot

All In One Dev

AllInOneDev aims to be a “one-codebase-for-everything” template: web, iOS and Android — unifying your frontend and backend so you don’t have to build separate projects for each platform. Under the hood it uses technologies like Next.js (for web), React Native + Expo (for mobile), along with TypeScript, a monorepo via Yarn workspaces, shared UI and logic, styling via NativeWind (tailwind-style for cross-platform) and a folder structure aimed at reuse across mobile and web. The template bundles lots of common “plumbing” out of the box: user authentication (via Firebase Auth), payment integration for both web payments (via Stripe) and in-app mobile purchases/subscriptions (via RevenueCat), analytics & user-tracking, internationalization (multi-language support), push notifications, and a set of default screens/routes (onboarding, login/register, home/dashboard, profile/settings, plus landing/pricing pages for web). In practice this means if you pick AllInOneDev you get a starting point that covers almost everything non-business-specific: cross-platform UI and styling, authentication, payments, analytics, data & backend integration, navigation, and a shared codebase to reuse across web and mobile — which can save you significant development time compared to building each platform separately. However it’s important to keep things realistic. AllInOneDev is a closed (paid) boilerplate, with a license that lets you build unlimited projects personally or with a team (but doesn’t transfer ownership of the boilerplate itself) and you must respect its license terms. By using it, you also commit to its architectural choices: monorepo structure, React-Native + Next + Expo + Firebase/RevenueCat/Stripe stack, styling via NativeWind, Redux Toolkit, etc. That’s fine if you agree with those choices — but if your project needs a drastically different architecture (something more minimal, or different backend, or different payment/infrastructure stack), adapting or decoupling from AllInOneDev might get heavy. AllInOneDev is suitable if you're starting a cross-platform app (web + mobile), want to move quickly, and don’t mind leaning on a ready-made, opinionated stack so you can focus on the actual product logic. If instead you want minimal dependencies, maximum control or want to avoid vendor lock-in (Firebase, RevenueCat, etc.), then a lighter or custom solution might be more appropriate.

$499
by Christian Esmann
Visit Website
Best Value
FastPocket screenshot

FastPocket

FastPocket is a boilerplate / starter‑kit for building web apps using PocketBase (as backend/database) paired with a modern frontend (Astro + React + TailwindCSS + daisyUI). It aims to give you a working foundation including authentication, payment integration, UI components, and deployment templates so you can move fast from idea to working app. FastPocket bundles support for payment processing via Stripe (one‑time and recurring payments) and ensures that your Stripe products synchronize with PocketBase which helps if you’re building a monetized web service. It also comes with a component library + theming (TailwindCSS + daisyUI) and pre-built UI components / layout structures (buttons, modals, cards, etc.), enabling rapid UI setup without designing everything from scratch. In addition, FastPocket provides documentation and deployment templates (for hosting backend and frontend), which lowers friction when going live. FastPocket fits developers or small teams who want to: start a web‑app or SaaS quickly, avoid spending time wiring auth, payments, backend, frontend, and instead focus on building the “real” product logic or features. Because it uses PocketBase, it can be a lightweight yet functional backend for small to medium‑sized apps. It also works well if you appreciate having an integrated stack (backend + payments + frontend + UI) that plays nicely together ideal for prototypes, MVPs, or first versions of a product.

$75
by Samuel Wyndham
Visit Website

Key Features

AuthenticationStripeDashboardSubscriptions

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Feature
All In One Dev$499
FastPocket$75
Price$499$75
DeveloperChristian EsmannSamuel Wyndham
Authentication
Stripe Integration
Paddle Integration
Lemon Squeezy
Dodo Payments
Polar
Creem
Admin Panel
User Dashboard
Subscriptions
Blog
SEO Optimized
Documentation
Support
Tailwind CSS
API
Two-Factor Auth
Multi-Tenancy
Teams
Shadcn UI
View DetailsView PageView Page

All In One Dev vs FastPocket: Detailed Analysis

When choosing between All In One Dev and FastPocket, it's essential to understand the key differences that make each boilerplate unique. Both are excellent choices for building SaaS applications, but they cater to different needs and development approaches.

What is All In One Dev?

AllInOneDev aims to be a “one-codebase-for-everything” template: web, iOS and Android — unifying your frontend and backend so you don’t have to build separate projects for each platform. Under the hood it uses technologies like Next.js (for web), React Native + Expo (for mobile), along with TypeScript, a monorepo via Yarn workspaces, shared UI and logic, styling via NativeWind (tailwind-style for cross-platform) and a folder structure aimed at reuse across mobile and web. The template bundles lots of common “plumbing” out of the box: user authentication (via Firebase Auth), payment integration for both web payments (via Stripe) and in-app mobile purchases/subscriptions (via RevenueCat), analytics & user-tracking, internationalization (multi-language support), push notifications, and a set of default screens/routes (onboarding, login/register, home/dashboard, profile/settings, plus landing/pricing pages for web). In practice this means if you pick AllInOneDev you get a starting point that covers almost everything non-business-specific: cross-platform UI and styling, authentication, payments, analytics, data & backend integration, navigation, and a shared codebase to reuse across web and mobile — which can save you significant development time compared to building each platform separately. However it’s important to keep things realistic. AllInOneDev is a closed (paid) boilerplate, with a license that lets you build unlimited projects personally or with a team (but doesn’t transfer ownership of the boilerplate itself) and you must respect its license terms. By using it, you also commit to its architectural choices: monorepo structure, React-Native + Next + Expo + Firebase/RevenueCat/Stripe stack, styling via NativeWind, Redux Toolkit, etc. That’s fine if you agree with those choices — but if your project needs a drastically different architecture (something more minimal, or different backend, or different payment/infrastructure stack), adapting or decoupling from AllInOneDev might get heavy. AllInOneDev is suitable if you're starting a cross-platform app (web + mobile), want to move quickly, and don’t mind leaning on a ready-made, opinionated stack so you can focus on the actual product logic. If instead you want minimal dependencies, maximum control or want to avoid vendor lock-in (Firebase, RevenueCat, etc.), then a lighter or custom solution might be more appropriate.

Developed by Christian Esmann, All In One Dev has become a popular choice among developers looking for a reliable starting point for their SaaS projects.

What is FastPocket?

FastPocket is a boilerplate / starter‑kit for building web apps using PocketBase (as backend/database) paired with a modern frontend (Astro + React + TailwindCSS + daisyUI). It aims to give you a working foundation including authentication, payment integration, UI components, and deployment templates so you can move fast from idea to working app. FastPocket bundles support for payment processing via Stripe (one‑time and recurring payments) and ensures that your Stripe products synchronize with PocketBase which helps if you’re building a monetized web service. It also comes with a component library + theming (TailwindCSS + daisyUI) and pre-built UI components / layout structures (buttons, modals, cards, etc.), enabling rapid UI setup without designing everything from scratch. In addition, FastPocket provides documentation and deployment templates (for hosting backend and frontend), which lowers friction when going live. FastPocket fits developers or small teams who want to: start a web‑app or SaaS quickly, avoid spending time wiring auth, payments, backend, frontend, and instead focus on building the “real” product logic or features. Because it uses PocketBase, it can be a lightweight yet functional backend for small to medium‑sized apps. It also works well if you appreciate having an integrated stack (backend + payments + frontend + UI) that plays nicely together ideal for prototypes, MVPs, or first versions of a product.

Created by Samuel Wyndham, FastPocket offers a robust foundation for building scalable SaaS applications.

Need to Promote Your Startup or Boilerplate?

Rainbow celebration

Check out LaunchDirectories.com to get your startup or boilerplate listed in 100+ product launch directories and gain valuable backlinks from high-authority platforms. This is especially effective for new products looking to quickly build domain authority and gain backlinks.

Payment Integration: All In One Dev vs FastPocket

When building a SaaS application, choosing the right payment integration is crucial for monetization success. Let's compare the payment options available in All In One Dev and FastPocket.

FastPocket Payment Options

FastPocket integrates with Stripe.

Key Differences Between All In One Dev and FastPocket

💰 Pricing

All In One Dev is priced at $499, while FastPocket costs $75. FastPocket offers better value at a lower price point, saving you 424 dollars.

⚡ Features & Capabilities

FastPocket includes authentication, while All In One Dev does not.

🎯 Best Use Cases

All In One Dev

  • • SaaS startups looking for quick deployment
  • • Projects requiring custom features
  • • Teams with flexible budgets

FastPocket

  • • SaaS applications needing rapid development
  • • Projects requiring authentication
  • • Teams with limited budgets

When to Choose All In One Dev vs FastPocket

Choose All In One Dev if:

  • You want to start with All In One Dev's specific tech stack and approach
  • Your project aligns with All In One Dev's feature set

Choose FastPocket if:

  • You're looking for the most cost-effective solution
  • You need built-in authentication out of the box
  • You prefer FastPocket's specific approach and features
  • Your requirements match FastPocket's capabilities

Final Verdict: All In One Dev vs FastPocket

Both All In One Dev and FastPocket are excellent choices for building SaaS applications. Your decision should be based on your specific requirements, budget, and technical preferences.

All In One Dev is ideal if you're looking for a feature-rich solution with specific capabilities.

FastPocket stands out for its competitive pricing and is perfect for developers who need authentication.

Ultimately, both boilerplates will help you launch your SaaS product faster and more efficiently. Review the detailed comparison above, consider your project requirements, and choose the one that aligns best with your goals.

Frequently Asked Questions: All In One Dev vs FastPocket

Which is better: All In One Dev or FastPocket?

The "better" choice depends on your specific needs. All In One Dev excels in comprehensive features, while FastPocketstands out for value pricing. Consider your budget, required features, and development timeline when making your decision.

What's the price difference between All In One Dev and FastPocket?

All In One Dev costs $499 while FastPocket is priced at $75. That's a difference of $424. Both are one-time payments with no recurring fees, making them cost-effective long-term investments for your SaaS project.

Can I switch from All In One Dev to FastPocket later?

While technically possible, switching boilerplates mid-project is challenging and time-consuming. Each boilerplate has its own architecture, dependencies, and patterns. It's best to carefully evaluate both options now and choose the one that best fits your long-term needs to avoid costly migrations later.

Do All In One Dev and FastPocket offer similar features?

Both boilerplates offer core SaaS features, but with different implementations and additional capabilities. Check the detailed feature comparison table above to see exactly which features each boilerplate includes. Key differences include payment integrations, authentication systems, and admin panel availability.

Which boilerplate is better for beginners?

For beginners, consider factors like documentation quality, community support, and code complexity. Both All In One Dev and FastPocket are designed to be developer-friendly, but your choice should depend on your familiarity with their respective tech stacks and the learning resources available.

Are there any hidden costs with All In One Dev or FastPocket?

Both boilerplates are one-time purchases with no recurring licensing fees. However, you may incur costs for third-party services they integrate with (like payment processors, email services, or hosting platforms). These operational costs are separate from the boilerplate purchase and apply to any SaaS application.

How long does it take to launch with All In One Dev vs FastPocket?

Both boilerplates significantly reduce development time compared to building from scratch. Depending on your customization needs, you could launch a basic SaaS product in days or weeks rather than months. The exact timeline depends on your specific requirements, team size, and development experience.

Explore More Comparisons

Browse all boilerplates and find the perfect starter kit for your SaaS project.