Detailed Comparison 2025
All In One Dev vs BuilderKit
Compare All In One Dev and BuilderKit side-by-side. We've analyzed features, pricing, and capabilities to help you choose the best boilerplate for your SaaS project.
Quick Overview

All In One Dev
AllInOneDev aims to be a “one-codebase-for-everything” template: web, iOS and Android — unifying your frontend and backend so you don’t have to build separate projects for each platform. Under the hood it uses technologies like Next.js (for web), React Native + Expo (for mobile), along with TypeScript, a monorepo via Yarn workspaces, shared UI and logic, styling via NativeWind (tailwind-style for cross-platform) and a folder structure aimed at reuse across mobile and web. The template bundles lots of common “plumbing” out of the box: user authentication (via Firebase Auth), payment integration for both web payments (via Stripe) and in-app mobile purchases/subscriptions (via RevenueCat), analytics & user-tracking, internationalization (multi-language support), push notifications, and a set of default screens/routes (onboarding, login/register, home/dashboard, profile/settings, plus landing/pricing pages for web). In practice this means if you pick AllInOneDev you get a starting point that covers almost everything non-business-specific: cross-platform UI and styling, authentication, payments, analytics, data & backend integration, navigation, and a shared codebase to reuse across web and mobile — which can save you significant development time compared to building each platform separately. However it’s important to keep things realistic. AllInOneDev is a closed (paid) boilerplate, with a license that lets you build unlimited projects personally or with a team (but doesn’t transfer ownership of the boilerplate itself) and you must respect its license terms. By using it, you also commit to its architectural choices: monorepo structure, React-Native + Next + Expo + Firebase/RevenueCat/Stripe stack, styling via NativeWind, Redux Toolkit, etc. That’s fine if you agree with those choices — but if your project needs a drastically different architecture (something more minimal, or different backend, or different payment/infrastructure stack), adapting or decoupling from AllInOneDev might get heavy. AllInOneDev is suitable if you're starting a cross-platform app (web + mobile), want to move quickly, and don’t mind leaning on a ready-made, opinionated stack so you can focus on the actual product logic. If instead you want minimal dependencies, maximum control or want to avoid vendor lock-in (Firebase, RevenueCat, etc.), then a lighter or custom solution might be more appropriate.

BuilderKit
BuilderKit.ai is a boilerplate / starter‑kit built with Next.js + Supabase + Tailwind CSS + TypeScript, aimed at helping developers launch AI‑powered SaaS/web applications quickly. Rather than being a minimal template, BuilderKit comes pre‑wired with modules and features that cover many needs for an AI SaaS: authentication (email, Google auth, magic‑link), payments (via Stripe or LemonSqueezy), email integrations, admin dashboard, SEO‑friendly landing pages & waitlist pages, and even pre-built AI‑app demos. On top of that, BuilderKit bundles 10‑15+ ready-to-use AI tools / applications: for example chat, image generation, PDF‑chat, voice transcription, image‑enhancing / upscaling, and more, so you don’t just get a skeleton, but a suite of working AI‑powered features you can build on or customize. he code is distributed via a GitHub repo, and once set up (with environment variables, dependencies installed, etc.) you can run and deploy the app commonly on platforms like Vercel.
Key Features
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | All In One Dev$499 | BuilderKit$99 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $499 | $99 |
| Developer | Christian Esmann | Vatsal Sanghvi |
| Authentication | ||
| Stripe Integration | ||
| Paddle Integration | ||
| Lemon Squeezy | ||
| Dodo Payments | ||
| Polar | ||
| Creem | ||
| Admin Panel | ||
| User Dashboard | ||
| Subscriptions | ||
| Blog | ||
| SEO Optimized | ||
| Documentation | ||
| Support | ||
| Tailwind CSS | ||
| API | ||
| Two-Factor Auth | ||
| Multi-Tenancy | ||
| Teams | ||
| Shadcn UI | ||
| View Details | View Page | View Page |
All In One Dev vs BuilderKit: Detailed Analysis
When choosing between All In One Dev and BuilderKit, it's essential to understand the key differences that make each boilerplate unique. Both are excellent choices for building SaaS applications, but they cater to different needs and development approaches.
What is All In One Dev?
AllInOneDev aims to be a “one-codebase-for-everything” template: web, iOS and Android — unifying your frontend and backend so you don’t have to build separate projects for each platform. Under the hood it uses technologies like Next.js (for web), React Native + Expo (for mobile), along with TypeScript, a monorepo via Yarn workspaces, shared UI and logic, styling via NativeWind (tailwind-style for cross-platform) and a folder structure aimed at reuse across mobile and web. The template bundles lots of common “plumbing” out of the box: user authentication (via Firebase Auth), payment integration for both web payments (via Stripe) and in-app mobile purchases/subscriptions (via RevenueCat), analytics & user-tracking, internationalization (multi-language support), push notifications, and a set of default screens/routes (onboarding, login/register, home/dashboard, profile/settings, plus landing/pricing pages for web). In practice this means if you pick AllInOneDev you get a starting point that covers almost everything non-business-specific: cross-platform UI and styling, authentication, payments, analytics, data & backend integration, navigation, and a shared codebase to reuse across web and mobile — which can save you significant development time compared to building each platform separately. However it’s important to keep things realistic. AllInOneDev is a closed (paid) boilerplate, with a license that lets you build unlimited projects personally or with a team (but doesn’t transfer ownership of the boilerplate itself) and you must respect its license terms. By using it, you also commit to its architectural choices: monorepo structure, React-Native + Next + Expo + Firebase/RevenueCat/Stripe stack, styling via NativeWind, Redux Toolkit, etc. That’s fine if you agree with those choices — but if your project needs a drastically different architecture (something more minimal, or different backend, or different payment/infrastructure stack), adapting or decoupling from AllInOneDev might get heavy. AllInOneDev is suitable if you're starting a cross-platform app (web + mobile), want to move quickly, and don’t mind leaning on a ready-made, opinionated stack so you can focus on the actual product logic. If instead you want minimal dependencies, maximum control or want to avoid vendor lock-in (Firebase, RevenueCat, etc.), then a lighter or custom solution might be more appropriate.
Developed by Christian Esmann, All In One Dev has become a popular choice among developers looking for a reliable starting point for their SaaS projects.
What is BuilderKit?
BuilderKit.ai is a boilerplate / starter‑kit built with Next.js + Supabase + Tailwind CSS + TypeScript, aimed at helping developers launch AI‑powered SaaS/web applications quickly. Rather than being a minimal template, BuilderKit comes pre‑wired with modules and features that cover many needs for an AI SaaS: authentication (email, Google auth, magic‑link), payments (via Stripe or LemonSqueezy), email integrations, admin dashboard, SEO‑friendly landing pages & waitlist pages, and even pre-built AI‑app demos. On top of that, BuilderKit bundles 10‑15+ ready-to-use AI tools / applications: for example chat, image generation, PDF‑chat, voice transcription, image‑enhancing / upscaling, and more, so you don’t just get a skeleton, but a suite of working AI‑powered features you can build on or customize. he code is distributed via a GitHub repo, and once set up (with environment variables, dependencies installed, etc.) you can run and deploy the app commonly on platforms like Vercel.
Created by Vatsal Sanghvi, BuilderKit offers a robust foundation for building scalable SaaS applications.
Need to Promote Your Startup or Boilerplate?

Check out LaunchDirectories.com to get your startup or boilerplate listed in 100+ product launch directories and gain valuable backlinks from high-authority platforms. This is especially effective for new products looking to quickly build domain authority and gain backlinks.
Payment Integration: All In One Dev vs BuilderKit
When building a SaaS application, choosing the right payment integration is crucial for monetization success. Let's compare the payment options available in All In One Dev and BuilderKit.
BuilderKit Payment Options
BuilderKit integrates with Stripe and Lemon Squeezy. With Merchant of Record support, you can focus on building your product while the payment provider handles tax compliance, invoicing, and regulatory requirements across different countries.
Key Differences Between All In One Dev and BuilderKit
💰 Pricing
All In One Dev is priced at $499, while BuilderKit costs $99. BuilderKit offers better value at a lower price point, saving you 400 dollars.
⚡ Features & Capabilities
BuilderKit includes authentication, while All In One Dev does not.
BuilderKit includes an admin panel for easier application management.
🎯 Best Use Cases
All In One Dev
- • SaaS startups looking for quick deployment
- • Projects requiring custom features
- • Teams with flexible budgets
BuilderKit
- • SaaS applications needing rapid development
- • Projects requiring authentication
- • Teams with limited budgets
When to Choose All In One Dev vs BuilderKit
Choose All In One Dev if:
- You want to start with All In One Dev's specific tech stack and approach
- Your project aligns with All In One Dev's feature set
Choose BuilderKit if:
- You're looking for the most cost-effective solution
- You need built-in authentication out of the box
- You require an admin panel for managing your application
- You prefer BuilderKit's specific approach and features
- Your requirements match BuilderKit's capabilities
Final Verdict: All In One Dev vs BuilderKit
Both All In One Dev and BuilderKit are excellent choices for building SaaS applications. Your decision should be based on your specific requirements, budget, and technical preferences.
All In One Dev is ideal if you're looking for a feature-rich solution with specific capabilities.
BuilderKit stands out for its competitive pricing and is perfect for developers who need authentication.
Ultimately, both boilerplates will help you launch your SaaS product faster and more efficiently. Review the detailed comparison above, consider your project requirements, and choose the one that aligns best with your goals.
Frequently Asked Questions: All In One Dev vs BuilderKit
Which is better: All In One Dev or BuilderKit?
The "better" choice depends on your specific needs. All In One Dev excels in comprehensive features, while BuilderKitstands out for value pricing. Consider your budget, required features, and development timeline when making your decision.
What's the price difference between All In One Dev and BuilderKit?
All In One Dev costs $499 while BuilderKit is priced at $99. That's a difference of $400. Both are one-time payments with no recurring fees, making them cost-effective long-term investments for your SaaS project.
Can I switch from All In One Dev to BuilderKit later?
While technically possible, switching boilerplates mid-project is challenging and time-consuming. Each boilerplate has its own architecture, dependencies, and patterns. It's best to carefully evaluate both options now and choose the one that best fits your long-term needs to avoid costly migrations later.
Do All In One Dev and BuilderKit offer similar features?
Both boilerplates offer core SaaS features, but with different implementations and additional capabilities. Check the detailed feature comparison table above to see exactly which features each boilerplate includes. Key differences include payment integrations, authentication systems, and admin panel availability.
Which boilerplate is better for beginners?
For beginners, consider factors like documentation quality, community support, and code complexity. Both All In One Dev and BuilderKit are designed to be developer-friendly, but your choice should depend on your familiarity with their respective tech stacks and the learning resources available.
Are there any hidden costs with All In One Dev or BuilderKit?
Both boilerplates are one-time purchases with no recurring licensing fees. However, you may incur costs for third-party services they integrate with (like payment processors, email services, or hosting platforms). These operational costs are separate from the boilerplate purchase and apply to any SaaS application.
How long does it take to launch with All In One Dev vs BuilderKit?
Both boilerplates significantly reduce development time compared to building from scratch. Depending on your customization needs, you could launch a basic SaaS product in days or weeks rather than months. The exact timeline depends on your specific requirements, team size, and development experience.
Explore More Comparisons
Browse all boilerplates and find the perfect starter kit for your SaaS project.