Detailed Comparison 2025
Achromatic vs Staater Dev
Compare Achromatic and Staater Dev side-by-side. We've analyzed features, pricing, and capabilities to help you choose the best boilerplate for your SaaS project.
Quick Overview
Achromatic
Achromatic is a Next.js 15–based SaaS starter that tries to cover most of the groundwork developers usually build themselves: authentication, organizations, role management, billing, email, and a consistent UI built on shadcn/ui and Tailwind. The appeal is that it doesn’t just drop in loose components — the pieces are wired together in a way that feels closer to a real application than a template. The onboarding flow, subscription logic, and organization system actually work out of the box, which makes it easy to jump into feature development without spending days on the usual boilerplate chores. There are a few things worth noting, though. The project is relatively new, and the ecosystem around it is still small, so you’re buying into a structure that depends heavily on the maintainer’s ongoing involvement. It’s an opinionated setup, which is great if you like the architecture as-is, but less ideal if you prefer a lighter, more minimal foundation. Achromatic positions itself as a time-saver for developers who want a polished starting point rather than assembling every piece manually, and it mostly succeeds at that. Still, it’s best suited for teams comfortable adopting someone else’s patterns and conventions anyone needing maximum flexibility might find it a bit heavier than they’d like.
Key Features
Staater Dev
staarter.dev is a full‑stack boilerplate / SaaS starter kit built on Next.js + TypeScript, designed to accelerate launching SaaS applications by giving a pre‑wired foundation rather than starting from scratch. It aims to save developers time and effort by bundling typical SaaS infrastructure authentication, billing/subscriptions, localization, UI scaffolding, and more into a ready‑to‑deploy template.
Key Features
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | Achromatic$180 | Staater Dev$399 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $180 | $399 |
| Developer | Mahmut Jomaa | Nikolai Kolodziej |
| Authentication | ||
| Stripe Integration | ||
| Paddle Integration | ||
| Lemon Squeezy | ||
| Dodo Payments | ||
| Polar | ||
| Creem | ||
| Admin Panel | ||
| User Dashboard | ||
| Subscriptions | ||
| Blog | ||
| SEO Optimized | ||
| Documentation | ||
| Support | ||
| Tailwind CSS | ||
| API | ||
| Two-Factor Auth | ||
| Multi-Tenancy | ||
| Teams | ||
| Shadcn UI | ||
| View Details | View Page | View Page |
Achromatic vs Staater Dev: Detailed Analysis
When choosing between Achromatic and Staater Dev, it's essential to understand the key differences that make each boilerplate unique. Both are excellent choices for building SaaS applications, but they cater to different needs and development approaches.
What is Achromatic?
Achromatic is a Next.js 15–based SaaS starter that tries to cover most of the groundwork developers usually build themselves: authentication, organizations, role management, billing, email, and a consistent UI built on shadcn/ui and Tailwind. The appeal is that it doesn’t just drop in loose components — the pieces are wired together in a way that feels closer to a real application than a template. The onboarding flow, subscription logic, and organization system actually work out of the box, which makes it easy to jump into feature development without spending days on the usual boilerplate chores. There are a few things worth noting, though. The project is relatively new, and the ecosystem around it is still small, so you’re buying into a structure that depends heavily on the maintainer’s ongoing involvement. It’s an opinionated setup, which is great if you like the architecture as-is, but less ideal if you prefer a lighter, more minimal foundation. Achromatic positions itself as a time-saver for developers who want a polished starting point rather than assembling every piece manually, and it mostly succeeds at that. Still, it’s best suited for teams comfortable adopting someone else’s patterns and conventions anyone needing maximum flexibility might find it a bit heavier than they’d like.
Developed by Mahmut Jomaa, Achromatic has become a popular choice among developers looking for a reliable starting point for their SaaS projects.
What is Staater Dev?
staarter.dev is a full‑stack boilerplate / SaaS starter kit built on Next.js + TypeScript, designed to accelerate launching SaaS applications by giving a pre‑wired foundation rather than starting from scratch. It aims to save developers time and effort by bundling typical SaaS infrastructure authentication, billing/subscriptions, localization, UI scaffolding, and more into a ready‑to‑deploy template.
Created by Nikolai Kolodziej, Staater Dev offers a robust foundation for building scalable SaaS applications.
Need to Promote Your Startup or Boilerplate?
Check out LaunchDirectories.com to get your startup or boilerplate listed in 100+ product launch directories and gain valuable backlinks from high-authority platforms. This is especially effective for new products looking to quickly build domain authority and gain backlinks.
Payment Integration: Achromatic vs Staater Dev
When building a SaaS application, choosing the right payment integration is crucial for monetization success. Let's compare the payment options available in Achromatic and Staater Dev.
Achromatic Payment Options
Achromatic supports Stripe.
Staater Dev Payment Options
Staater Dev integrates with Stripe and Lemon Squeezy. With Merchant of Record support, you can focus on building your product while the payment provider handles tax compliance, invoicing, and regulatory requirements across different countries.
Key Differences Between Achromatic and Staater Dev
💰 Pricing
Achromatic is priced at $180, while Staater Dev costs $399. This makes Achromatic the more budget-friendly option, potentially saving you 219 dollars.
⚡ Features & Capabilities
Both boilerplates include authentication systems, making it easy to implement user login and registration.
Payment processing is available in both options. Achromatic supports Stripe, while Staater Dev integrates with Stripe, Lemon Squeezy.
Both include admin panels for managing your application.
🎯 Best Use Cases
Achromatic
- • SaaS startups looking for quick deployment
- • Projects requiring authentication
- • Teams with limited budgets
Staater Dev
- • SaaS applications needing rapid development
- • Projects requiring authentication
- • Teams with flexible budgets
When to Choose Achromatic vs Staater Dev
Choose Achromatic if:
- You're looking for the most cost-effective solution
- You want to start with Achromatic's specific tech stack and approach
- Your project aligns with Achromatic's feature set
Choose Staater Dev if:
- You prefer Staater Dev's specific approach and features
- Your requirements match Staater Dev's capabilities
Final Verdict: Achromatic vs Staater Dev
Both Achromatic and Staater Dev are excellent choices for building SaaS applications. Your decision should be based on your specific requirements, budget, and technical preferences.
Achromatic is ideal if you're looking for a more affordable option with built-in authentication.
Staater Dev stands out for its comprehensive feature set and is perfect for developers who need authentication.
Ultimately, both boilerplates will help you launch your SaaS product faster and more efficiently. Review the detailed comparison above, consider your project requirements, and choose the one that aligns best with your goals.
Frequently Asked Questions: Achromatic vs Staater Dev
Which is better: Achromatic or Staater Dev?
The "better" choice depends on your specific needs. Achromatic excels in affordability, while Staater Devstands out for its feature set. Consider your budget, required features, and development timeline when making your decision.
What's the price difference between Achromatic and Staater Dev?
Achromatic costs $180 while Staater Dev is priced at $399. That's a difference of $219. Both are one-time payments with no recurring fees, making them cost-effective long-term investments for your SaaS project.
Can I switch from Achromatic to Staater Dev later?
While technically possible, switching boilerplates mid-project is challenging and time-consuming. Each boilerplate has its own architecture, dependencies, and patterns. It's best to carefully evaluate both options now and choose the one that best fits your long-term needs to avoid costly migrations later.
Do Achromatic and Staater Dev offer similar features?
Both boilerplates offer core SaaS features, but with different implementations and additional capabilities. Check the detailed feature comparison table above to see exactly which features each boilerplate includes. Key differences include payment integrations, authentication systems, and admin panel availability.
Which boilerplate is better for beginners?
For beginners, consider factors like documentation quality, community support, and code complexity. Both Achromatic and Staater Dev are designed to be developer-friendly, but your choice should depend on your familiarity with their respective tech stacks and the learning resources available.
Are there any hidden costs with Achromatic or Staater Dev?
Both boilerplates are one-time purchases with no recurring licensing fees. However, you may incur costs for third-party services they integrate with (like payment processors, email services, or hosting platforms). These operational costs are separate from the boilerplate purchase and apply to any SaaS application.
How long does it take to launch with Achromatic vs Staater Dev?
Both boilerplates significantly reduce development time compared to building from scratch. Depending on your customization needs, you could launch a basic SaaS product in days or weeks rather than months. The exact timeline depends on your specific requirements, team size, and development experience.
Explore More Comparisons
Browse all boilerplates and find the perfect starter kit for your SaaS project.