31SaaS vs NextJet

When choosing between 31SaaS and NextJet, it's essential to understand the key differences that make each boilerplate unique. Both are excellent choices for building SaaS applications, but they cater to different needs and development approaches.

What is 31SaaS?

31SaaS feels like a project built by someone who actually ships products, not someone assembling a checklist of features. The whole thing runs on Next.js 14, and the structure is clean in a way that makes sense the moment you open the repo — the kind of layout you’d probably set up yourself after a few iterations, just without the wasted weekend. The authentication flow, Stripe setup, and email handling are already connected and working, not half-finished stubs. The UI is put together with shadcn and Tailwind, so it looks modern without being overdesigned, and it’s easy to extend without fighting the styling choices. What stands out is that you can start building real features almost immediately. There’s a proper dashboard, a place for marketing pages, a blog engine that doesn’t feel like an afterthought, and small touches like sensible error handling and clean form patterns. It’s not trying to reinvent the wheel — it’s just a solid, well-assembled foundation that saves you from the usual setup grind. If you want a boilerplate that stays out of your way and lets you move quickly without later regretting the shortcuts, 31SaaS is one of the more thoughtfully built options out there.

Developed by Said Hasyim, 31SaaS has become a popular choice among developers looking for a reliable starting point for their SaaS projects.

What is NextJet?

NextJet is a full‑stack SaaS boilerplate built with Next.js, TypeScript and modern web‑app tooling, made to give developers a solid, production‑ready foundation when building subscription‑based or SaaS‑style applications. Out of the box it handles core infrastructure: user authentication + authorization (including OAuth and magic‑link support), payment/subscription logic via Stripe or Lemon Squeezy, and pre‑built user dashboards + admin panel. It also includes content‑management and marketing‑side features: a blog and documentation system using MDX, a customizable landing/marketing site, email templates, and onboarding flows. The project follows a modular, maintainable architecture (monorepo via Turborepo, clean folder structure, typesafety via TypeScript), which helps keep code organized, useful if you plan to grow or scale the app over time. Because much of the “plumbing” is already configured, you can skip repetitive setup and get to building your product‑specific logic faster. At the same time, using NextJet means trusting its built‑in architecture, tech stack and conventions. If your project needs a very different stack, unusual backend/data requirements or a minimal footprint, you might need to refactor or drop parts of what comes with the boilerplate.

Created by Renas Hassan, NextJet offers a robust foundation for building scalable SaaS applications.

When building a SaaS application, choosing the right payment integration is crucial for monetization success. Let's compare the payment options available in 31SaaS and NextJet.

Both 31SaaS and NextJet are excellent choices for building SaaS applications. Your decision should be based on your specific requirements, budget, and technical preferences.

31SaaS is ideal if you're looking for a feature-rich solution with built-in authentication.

NextJet stands out for its competitive pricing and is perfect for developers who need authentication.

Ultimately, both boilerplates will help you launch your SaaS product faster and more efficiently. Review the detailed comparison above, consider your project requirements, and choose the one that aligns best with your goals.