31SaaS vs Makerkit

When choosing between 31SaaS and Makerkit, it's essential to understand the key differences that make each boilerplate unique. Both are excellent choices for building SaaS applications, but they cater to different needs and development approaches.

What is 31SaaS?

31SaaS feels like a project built by someone who actually ships products, not someone assembling a checklist of features. The whole thing runs on Next.js 14, and the structure is clean in a way that makes sense the moment you open the repo — the kind of layout you’d probably set up yourself after a few iterations, just without the wasted weekend. The authentication flow, Stripe setup, and email handling are already connected and working, not half-finished stubs. The UI is put together with shadcn and Tailwind, so it looks modern without being overdesigned, and it’s easy to extend without fighting the styling choices. What stands out is that you can start building real features almost immediately. There’s a proper dashboard, a place for marketing pages, a blog engine that doesn’t feel like an afterthought, and small touches like sensible error handling and clean form patterns. It’s not trying to reinvent the wheel — it’s just a solid, well-assembled foundation that saves you from the usual setup grind. If you want a boilerplate that stays out of your way and lets you move quickly without later regretting the shortcuts, 31SaaS is one of the more thoughtfully built options out there.

Developed by Said Hasyim, 31SaaS has become a popular choice among developers looking for a reliable starting point for their SaaS projects.

What is Makerkit?

MakerKit is a SaaS‑starter boilerplate built for modern React/Next.js (also supporting Remix/Supabase or Firebase variants) that tries to give you a production‑ready foundation, rather than a barebones template. At its core MakerKit bundles authentication (email, social login, magic‑link, optional MFA), user and team/organization management (multi‑tenancy, roles, invitations), and subscription/billing support via payment providers (Stripe or Lemon Squeezy). The boilerplate comes styled by default using a modern UI stack with Tailwind CSS (and Shadcn/Radix‑based UI components), with light/dark mode and includes UI scaffolding for dashboards, admin panels, marketing pages, blog/documentation pages, and a customizable layout structure. MakerKit aims to reduce the time and effort needed to ship a SaaS: instead of wiring up auth, payments, data layer, UI and common SaaS flows from scratch, you get a working skeleton that you can extend, customize, and build on. This includes also support for serverless or traditional hosting setups, built‑in support for sending stylized transactional emails, and optional plugins/features (like documentation/blog generation, admin dashboards, analytics hooks, and more) to help bootstrap both the product and its public-facing/marketing side.

Created by Giancarlo Buomprisco, Makerkit offers a robust foundation for building scalable SaaS applications.

When building a SaaS application, choosing the right payment integration is crucial for monetization success. Let's compare the payment options available in 31SaaS and Makerkit.

Both 31SaaS and Makerkit are excellent choices for building SaaS applications. Your decision should be based on your specific requirements, budget, and technical preferences.

31SaaS is ideal if you're looking for a more affordable option with built-in authentication.

Makerkit stands out for its comprehensive feature set and is perfect for developers who need authentication.

Ultimately, both boilerplates will help you launch your SaaS product faster and more efficiently. Review the detailed comparison above, consider your project requirements, and choose the one that aligns best with your goals.