Detailed Comparison 2025

Achromatic vs FlutFast

Compare Achromatic and FlutFast side-by-side. We've analyzed features, pricing, and capabilities to help you choose the best boilerplate for your SaaS project.

Quick Overview

Achromatic screenshot

Achromatic

Achromatic is a Next.js 15–based SaaS starter that tries to cover most of the groundwork developers usually build themselves: authentication, organizations, role management, billing, email, and a consistent UI built on shadcn/ui and Tailwind. The appeal is that it doesn’t just drop in loose components — the pieces are wired together in a way that feels closer to a real application than a template. The onboarding flow, subscription logic, and organization system actually work out of the box, which makes it easy to jump into feature development without spending days on the usual boilerplate chores. There are a few things worth noting, though. The project is relatively new, and the ecosystem around it is still small, so you’re buying into a structure that depends heavily on the maintainer’s ongoing involvement. It’s an opinionated setup, which is great if you like the architecture as-is, but less ideal if you prefer a lighter, more minimal foundation. Achromatic positions itself as a time-saver for developers who want a polished starting point rather than assembling every piece manually, and it mostly succeeds at that. Still, it’s best suited for teams comfortable adopting someone else’s patterns and conventions anyone needing maximum flexibility might find it a bit heavier than they’d like.

$180
by Mahmut Jomaa
Visit Website

Key Features

AuthenticationStripeAdmin PanelDashboardSubscriptions
Best Value
FlutFast screenshot

FlutFast

FlutFast is a commercial Flutter boilerplate that provides a full foundation for mobile apps, combining frontend, backend integration, and essential SaaS-style features. It includes pre-built UI components, navigation and state management, authentication flows, database connections, push notifications, and monetization support via in-app purchases or subscriptions. The backend integrates with Firebase or a Node/TypeScript server, while the frontend follows modern Flutter architecture with responsive layouts and componentized design. FlutFast also includes hooks for AI/ML integrations and analytics, offering a structured starting point for developers building cross-platform mobile applications. The project delivers pre-configured infrastructure and architecture, including database models, routing, and payment logic, all wired together according to best practices in Flutter development.

$60
by FlutFast
Visit Website

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Feature
Achromatic$180
FlutFast$60
Price$180$60
DeveloperMahmut JomaaFlutFast
Authentication
Stripe Integration
Paddle Integration
Lemon Squeezy
Dodo Payments
Polar
Creem
Admin Panel
User Dashboard
Subscriptions
Blog
SEO Optimized
Documentation
Support
Tailwind CSS
API
Two-Factor Auth
Multi-Tenancy
Teams
Shadcn UI
View DetailsView PageView Page

Achromatic vs FlutFast: Detailed Analysis

When choosing between Achromatic and FlutFast, it's essential to understand the key differences that make each boilerplate unique. Both are excellent choices for building SaaS applications, but they cater to different needs and development approaches.

What is Achromatic?

Achromatic is a Next.js 15–based SaaS starter that tries to cover most of the groundwork developers usually build themselves: authentication, organizations, role management, billing, email, and a consistent UI built on shadcn/ui and Tailwind. The appeal is that it doesn’t just drop in loose components — the pieces are wired together in a way that feels closer to a real application than a template. The onboarding flow, subscription logic, and organization system actually work out of the box, which makes it easy to jump into feature development without spending days on the usual boilerplate chores. There are a few things worth noting, though. The project is relatively new, and the ecosystem around it is still small, so you’re buying into a structure that depends heavily on the maintainer’s ongoing involvement. It’s an opinionated setup, which is great if you like the architecture as-is, but less ideal if you prefer a lighter, more minimal foundation. Achromatic positions itself as a time-saver for developers who want a polished starting point rather than assembling every piece manually, and it mostly succeeds at that. Still, it’s best suited for teams comfortable adopting someone else’s patterns and conventions anyone needing maximum flexibility might find it a bit heavier than they’d like.

Developed by Mahmut Jomaa, Achromatic has become a popular choice among developers looking for a reliable starting point for their SaaS projects.

What is FlutFast?

FlutFast is a commercial Flutter boilerplate that provides a full foundation for mobile apps, combining frontend, backend integration, and essential SaaS-style features. It includes pre-built UI components, navigation and state management, authentication flows, database connections, push notifications, and monetization support via in-app purchases or subscriptions. The backend integrates with Firebase or a Node/TypeScript server, while the frontend follows modern Flutter architecture with responsive layouts and componentized design. FlutFast also includes hooks for AI/ML integrations and analytics, offering a structured starting point for developers building cross-platform mobile applications. The project delivers pre-configured infrastructure and architecture, including database models, routing, and payment logic, all wired together according to best practices in Flutter development.

Created by FlutFast, FlutFast offers a robust foundation for building scalable SaaS applications.

Need to Promote Your Startup or Boilerplate?

Rainbow celebration

Check out LaunchDirectories.com to get your startup or boilerplate listed in 100+ product launch directories and gain valuable backlinks from high-authority platforms. This is especially effective for new products looking to quickly build domain authority and gain backlinks.

Payment Integration: Achromatic vs FlutFast

When building a SaaS application, choosing the right payment integration is crucial for monetization success. Let's compare the payment options available in Achromatic and FlutFast.

Achromatic Payment Options

Achromatic supports Stripe.

Key Differences Between Achromatic and FlutFast

💰 Pricing

Achromatic is priced at $180, while FlutFast costs $60. FlutFast offers better value at a lower price point, saving you 120 dollars.

⚡ Features & Capabilities

Achromatic includes authentication, while FlutFast does not, which could be a deciding factor for user-focused applications.

Achromatic includes an admin panel, giving you more control out of the box.

🎯 Best Use Cases

Achromatic

  • • SaaS startups looking for quick deployment
  • • Projects requiring authentication
  • • Teams with limited budgets

FlutFast

  • • SaaS applications needing rapid development
  • • Projects requiring custom features
  • • Teams with limited budgets

When to Choose Achromatic vs FlutFast

Choose Achromatic if:

  • You need built-in authentication out of the box
  • You require an admin panel for managing your application
  • You want to start with Achromatic's specific tech stack and approach
  • Your project aligns with Achromatic's feature set

Choose FlutFast if:

  • You're looking for the most cost-effective solution
  • You prefer FlutFast's specific approach and features
  • Your requirements match FlutFast's capabilities

Final Verdict: Achromatic vs FlutFast

Both Achromatic and FlutFast are excellent choices for building SaaS applications. Your decision should be based on your specific requirements, budget, and technical preferences.

Achromatic is ideal if you're looking for a feature-rich solution with built-in authentication.

FlutFast stands out for its competitive pricing and is perfect for developers who need specific features.

Ultimately, both boilerplates will help you launch your SaaS product faster and more efficiently. Review the detailed comparison above, consider your project requirements, and choose the one that aligns best with your goals.

Frequently Asked Questions: Achromatic vs FlutFast

Which is better: Achromatic or FlutFast?

The "better" choice depends on your specific needs. Achromatic excels in comprehensive features, while FlutFaststands out for value pricing. Consider your budget, required features, and development timeline when making your decision.

What's the price difference between Achromatic and FlutFast?

Achromatic costs $180 while FlutFast is priced at $60. That's a difference of $120. Both are one-time payments with no recurring fees, making them cost-effective long-term investments for your SaaS project.

Can I switch from Achromatic to FlutFast later?

While technically possible, switching boilerplates mid-project is challenging and time-consuming. Each boilerplate has its own architecture, dependencies, and patterns. It's best to carefully evaluate both options now and choose the one that best fits your long-term needs to avoid costly migrations later.

Do Achromatic and FlutFast offer similar features?

Both boilerplates offer core SaaS features, but with different implementations and additional capabilities. Check the detailed feature comparison table above to see exactly which features each boilerplate includes. Key differences include payment integrations, authentication systems, and admin panel availability.

Which boilerplate is better for beginners?

For beginners, consider factors like documentation quality, community support, and code complexity. Both Achromatic and FlutFast are designed to be developer-friendly, but your choice should depend on your familiarity with their respective tech stacks and the learning resources available.

Are there any hidden costs with Achromatic or FlutFast?

Both boilerplates are one-time purchases with no recurring licensing fees. However, you may incur costs for third-party services they integrate with (like payment processors, email services, or hosting platforms). These operational costs are separate from the boilerplate purchase and apply to any SaaS application.

How long does it take to launch with Achromatic vs FlutFast?

Both boilerplates significantly reduce development time compared to building from scratch. Depending on your customization needs, you could launch a basic SaaS product in days or weeks rather than months. The exact timeline depends on your specific requirements, team size, and development experience.

Explore More Comparisons

Browse all boilerplates and find the perfect starter kit for your SaaS project.